TAMU POLS 206 - Elections / Realignments
Type Lecture Note
Pages 3

Unformatted text preview:

Elections / RealignmentsI. Turnout ProblemII. Critical Realigning ElectionsIII. The Divided SystemIV. Interest GroupsV. Why do groups Organizea. Theory of Collective Action-In the U.S. on a good day we get about 50 % vote turn out-If you compare the U.S to other established democracy -We don’t compare-Presidential elections are higher and midterm elections are lower-Very low for the Texas Primary-In the U.S. we do not go to the polls -Explanations for why people don’t vote:First rational choice explanationCost benefit analysis It is a hassle and costly to vote And then the benefit, how do you feel afterwards-Not did you just show up at the poll but did you show up ahead of time to register 30 days ahead of time-The costs can be high of registering and then voting so the idea is that we are asking too much -So we put our elections on a Tuesday, Asking people to vote before, after, and during work andasking people again to do a little extra work-Depending on state you live in, some polls close as different times-In other countries you don’t have to register and sometimes they will make Election Day a holiday so it isn’t too much of a hassle or to put Election Day on the weekend-Seen some in other countries-Trying to make it easier on as many people as possible-When Russia had first democratic elections, they put elections on a Monday and they made it aholiday; unintended holiday. Everyone turned it into a three day weekend and didn’t come back to vote-The deal is trying to make it where the cost of voting is low-We did try to make registration easier-In the 90s we post the motor voter act. With the motor voter act you can register to vote when you renew your driver’s license. There was a lot of enthusiasm of this. Problem is that with motor voter act, more people register to vote. The problem is that this did not affect turn out-A lot of people registered but more people didn’t turn out-Second explanation is the with drawl argument -Political scientist have researched who is not voting what groups. People of low income and low education are less likely to turn out. So they dig deeper and ask further question. People who are low income and low education are political ethicacy. Political ethicacy is the idea that you can affect the political process-That you are part of the political process-People tend to think they are not part of the political process and that they can’t affect it-Groups tend to be low in political ethicacy tend not to vote-Unemployed are very unlikely to vote-When you ask further questions to figure out what is it about being unemployed -It is thought that the unemployed do not have the link to the community, when you go to work you talk about not politics but other things as well and you feel connected and a part of the community. Not having a job takes that away from you. The unemployed takes that away from you-Gap in turnout rates between high and low education voters-In the us high in education voters are much more likely to vote-Third explanation-Comparativist explanation /Institutional explanation. What might be part of the problem for us isour electoral system, our institution. We know from previous lectures that all things combined lead us to two major parties. All the third fourth are forgotten. It is possible that our system leaving us with the two big parties and losing all the rest. Then some of us think that we don’t have a party that suits us, or that represents us. And so we might as well not even vote becauseyour vote will not make a difference for the third party. We don’t vote because we don’t like our options-Proportional representation systems-The research shows that PR systems tend to have higher turnouts from 10 to 15% -It’s possible our system is turning us off of voting-The cost is too high to go vote for somebody that is not going to win-Maybe if the third party had a better chance of winning more people would vote-All of these explanations when pulled together seem to give a better explanation of why we don’t


View Full Document

TAMU POLS 206 - Elections / Realignments

Type: Lecture Note
Pages: 3
Documents in this Course
Lecture 1

Lecture 1

30 pages

Lecture 2

Lecture 2

23 pages

Lecture 2

Lecture 2

23 pages

Exam 2

Exam 2

26 pages

TEST 2

TEST 2

15 pages

Exam 4

Exam 4

9 pages

Test 1

Test 1

6 pages

Test 3

Test 3

5 pages

Exam I

Exam I

19 pages

Exam IV

Exam IV

9 pages

Test 4

Test 4

8 pages

Test 2

Test 2

6 pages

Load more
Download Elections / Realignments
Our administrator received your request to download this document. We will send you the file to your email shortly.
Loading Unlocking...
Login

Join to view Elections / Realignments and access 3M+ class-specific study document.

or
We will never post anything without your permission.
Don't have an account?
Sign Up

Join to view Elections / Realignments 2 2 and access 3M+ class-specific study document.

or

By creating an account you agree to our Privacy Policy and Terms Of Use

Already a member?