DOC PREVIEW
UGA POLS 1101 - checks and balances

This preview shows page 1 out of 2 pages.

Save
View full document
Premium Document
Do you want full access? Go Premium and unlock all 2 pages.
Access to all documents
Download any document
Ad free experience

Unformatted text preview:

Ambition must be made to counter ambition Watergate a third rate break in or a Constitutional Crisis Nov 12th and Nov 14th Until the 1920s congress was the dominant branch Congress helped FDR out in a crisis also like ww2 very powerful president as a result Expansion power If party is internally divided then the president will have more power Until 1968 the government was always united because of the ballot all in the same Now it has generally been divided government If they are many moderates then there is common ground easier to negotiate Few moderates little compromise gridlock Why is it different polarization very conservative or liberal like this since the civil war Professionals been in politics for a while settle for part of the deal give up certain things in order to win then we get what we want Amateurs new and idealist same old stuff radical change going to the root concerned about the idealist purity tea party getting things done right Vietnam war a presidential action lasted a decade 1973 Congress passed the war powers act or resolution the president does have the authority but must get congress within 60 days or bring the troops back President said its not constitutional Impounding funds budget and impound control act in 1974 The legislative veto informal term simple majority of congress can veto Myes vs chataviolates separate powers so unconstitutional the laws passed were no laws 1980 s regean presidency iran gave the money to free the people in nirguaga violated the war needs to be impeached president did not know the laws were broken not personally involved Impeachment ultimate check on any branches result in removal from office constitution said judges serve on good behavior 11 and 7 of them were convicted For treason aid to enemies bribery or other high crimes or misdemeanors misbeavioring Lincoln chose a southern democrat to unite the nation andrew Johnson the vice president cant fire any cabinets the house didn t impeached him by one vote very weakened president Cheats on his income taxes personal lies under oath in a trial orders witnesses to be paid up knows that his aids and assistants are breaking law constitutional How involved was him how strong is the evidence in the constitution Bill Clinton lied to the American people is not illegal he lied under oath in a trial purgery not relevant to the trial obstruction of justice Also destroyed evidence House controlled by republicians impeached on 2 charges senate controlled by the republicans voted on the 2 atricles of impeachment need 2 3 looks like partnership Watergate Federalist 52 campaign politics and the modern presidency congress and Supreme Court Im a member congress house of rep formal charges if yes then senate guilty Thoughts of impeachment is now common Back then impeachment was unthinkable focus on checks and balances Nixon was very capable administrator thus important strong dealings with congress focusing one scandal and the extent of his involvement Nixon elected 1968 during the Vietnam war won in small margin tries to stop the war His information with his administration was leaked to the public So a group was formed to stop the leaks the plumbers not illegal Top assistant made the plumbers to break in someone to stop the info from going to the press that s illegal not without warrant Also Nixon reelection campaign wanted to win do what is necessary that is not ordering a crime Some people in the committee found a plan Georgia govern very liberal So they wanted to run against him to win Solution Damage the leading democrats hired someone Now govern is leading nomination The re election campaign kept going Someone ordered the plumbers to break in the National democratic convention in the Watergate headquarters Put in listening devices and photograph documents This was news The white house said there was no involvement in the case actually that was a cover up That is not illegal They destroyed all evidence related to the case that is huge problem destroying evidence is a crime Members of the whitehouse have lied to the press The fbi also investigated in the crime but focused on the money People had hunred dollar bills in their pockets Nixon refer himself as the president he talks about the nation Pentagon paper involved in the Vietnam war


View Full Document
Loading Unlocking...
Login

Join to view checks and balances and access 3M+ class-specific study document.

or
We will never post anything without your permission.
Don't have an account?
Sign Up

Join to view checks and balances and access 3M+ class-specific study document.

or

By creating an account you agree to our Privacy Policy and Terms Of Use

Already a member?