DOC PREVIEW
Mizzou HSP_MGMT 1133 - Intentional Torts Continued
Type Lecture Note
Pages 2

This preview shows page 1 out of 2 pages.

Save
View full document
View full document
Premium Document
Do you want full access? Go Premium and unlock all 2 pages.
Access to all documents
Download any document
Ad free experience
Premium Document
Do you want full access? Go Premium and unlock all 2 pages.
Access to all documents
Download any document
Ad free experience

Unformatted text preview:

HSP MGMT 1133 1st Edition Lecture 23 Outline of Last Lecture I. Intentional Tortsa. Vicarious liabilityb. Respondeat superiorc. Assault and batteryd. Intentional infliction of emotional distresse. DefamationII. Privacy/Concept Lawsa. Invasion of privacy torti. Erin Andrews CaseOutline of Current Lecture III. Employee Privacya. Phone calls at workb. Email/computer usec. Computer used. Social networkinge. Appearance codesIV. False Imprisonmenta. Wrongful confinement of someone without justificationThese notes represent a detailed interpretation of the professor’s lecture. GradeBuddy is best used as a supplement to your own notes, not as a substitute.i. Shopkeeper’s privilege b. Strip search prank calls caseCurrent LecturePrivacy in the Hotel Guest register-new Supreme Court caseEmployee privacy - Phone calls at work- does the employer have the right to listen to your phone calls at work? They have the right to listen for a minute to see if it is personal or company related. If you’re on a company phone call then your employer has the right to listen to that; if it is a personal phone call then no; employer can prohibit personal calls at work; also have the right to record the calls- Email- same as telephone- Computer use- if you’re using their computer then they have a right to track it; if you’re on your personal social networking pages too much then they can prohibit it or take action against it- Social networking- if you’re in a state that doesn’t prohibit it, a business can ask you for your Facebook password and you have to give it to them; - Appearance codes/Personal conduct codes- can a business have a dress code or say your hair has to be a certain way/no tattoos/no piercings/etc? They do have a right to set a dress and appearance code if they want to False imprisonment- Wrongful confinement of someone without justification- usually happens when a business thinks someone has stolen from them so they stop them when they’re leaving and ask questions- Shopkeepers privilege- business owner can stop and detain people who are suspected oftheft and question them for a brief period of timeStrip search prank calls-Louise Ogborn incident- Ogborn vs Mcdonalds- Creepy man calls McDonalds and convinces the manager that heis a police officer investigating a theft and an employee in their store is stealing or has drugs on them and gets the manager to take off all the employees clothes in a back roomo Louise sued McDonalds for this incident for false imprisonment o She won the case for $6


View Full Document

Mizzou HSP_MGMT 1133 - Intentional Torts Continued

Type: Lecture Note
Pages: 2
Documents in this Course
Load more
Download Intentional Torts Continued
Our administrator received your request to download this document. We will send you the file to your email shortly.
Loading Unlocking...
Login

Join to view Intentional Torts Continued and access 3M+ class-specific study document.

or
We will never post anything without your permission.
Don't have an account?
Sign Up

Join to view Intentional Torts Continued 2 2 and access 3M+ class-specific study document.

or

By creating an account you agree to our Privacy Policy and Terms Of Use

Already a member?