DOC PREVIEW
UCF EEL 6788 - The Familiar Stranger

This preview shows page 1-2-15-16-31-32 out of 32 pages.

Save
View full document
View full document
Premium Document
Do you want full access? Go Premium and unlock all 32 pages.
Access to all documents
Download any document
Ad free experience
View full document
Premium Document
Do you want full access? Go Premium and unlock all 32 pages.
Access to all documents
Download any document
Ad free experience
View full document
Premium Document
Do you want full access? Go Premium and unlock all 32 pages.
Access to all documents
Download any document
Ad free experience
View full document
Premium Document
Do you want full access? Go Premium and unlock all 32 pages.
Access to all documents
Download any document
Ad free experience
View full document
Premium Document
Do you want full access? Go Premium and unlock all 32 pages.
Access to all documents
Download any document
Ad free experience
View full document
Premium Document
Do you want full access? Go Premium and unlock all 32 pages.
Access to all documents
Download any document
Ad free experience
Premium Document
Do you want full access? Go Premium and unlock all 32 pages.
Access to all documents
Download any document
Ad free experience

Unformatted text preview:

Slide 1IntroductionAbout MeAbout the Authors: Eric PaulosAbout the Authors: Elizabeth GoodmanIntel Research BerkeleyFamiliar StrangersScenario 1Scenario 2HistoryOther FindingsIntel Research GoalsProcedure 1 – Milgram RevisitedResults 1Procedure 2 – Urban Walking TourProcedure 2Procedure 2 ResultsWhere does this lead?Jabberwocky ConceptDigital ScentsFamiliar StrangersTurfHW DesignInterfaceMote InterfaceCell Phone InterfaceCell Phone InterfaceCell Phone InterfaceClosing RemarksFurther ResearchMy ThoughtsSourcesT19 – THE FAMILIAR STRANGERJames DotyEEL6788University of Central Florida24 Feb 2010IntroductionDo you see the same people, day after day, but you never say hello?Have you ever concocted a story or name for someone you see regularly?What makes you comfortable in a new situation?About MeBS Computer EngineeringPurdue University, May 2006Software EngineerHarris Corporation, Palm Bay, FLMS Computer Engineering studentUniversity of Central FloridaAbout the Authors: Eric PaulosCurrently a Professor at Carnegie Mellon UniversityHuman-Computer InteractionSecondary appt. with Robotics InstituteAdjunct faculty with Entertainment Technology CenterPhD. In Electrical Engineering from UC BerkeleyDeveloped some of the first internet tele-operated robotsFormerly a Senior Research Scientist at Intel Research in Berkeley, CAAbout the Authors: Elizabeth GoodmanMost recently, a visiting researcher at Microsoft ResearchShe has written articles for magazines such as Wired, Forbes, and SalonInterests are varied and include urban green space design, personal media, health technology, and other urban technology studiesFormer Professor at UC BerkeleySchool of InformationIntel Research BerkeleyUrban Atmospheres“… the very essence of person, place, and community are being redefined by personal wireless digital tools that transcend traditional physical constraints of time and space.”Other projects include mobile environmental research, place-based personal ringtones, and quantifying your relationship with a city (among other things)Familiar StrangersPeople seen regularly in a location but never spoken toThey often shape our view of a placeThey play a key role in our day-to-day social interactionsFormal definition:Must be observed repeatedlyMust have no real interactionScenario 1“A woman who has recently graduated from college has moved to a new city and doesn’t feel at home. The display on her familiarity device reinforces her growing sense of integration within her new neighborhood, and reassures her that familiar people are nearby, even if she does not recognize their faces. When she explores unfamiliar neighborhoods in the larger city, she is occasionally surprised to discover how many people around her she has encountered before.”Scenario 2“In the midst of a frustrating day, an urban professional decides that he doesn’t want to eat lunch in his usual spot. After years at the same job, the large city seems more like a small town. He sees the same people every day in the same places. He wants to escape. As he walks quickly away from his work, he occasionally checks his familiarity device to see if there are any Familiar Strangers nearby. When he finds a street that the device tells him is completely unfamiliar, he chooses a restaurant. He feels as if he’s exploring new territory and though he is still surrounded by other people, he feels much less crowded than he did 15 minutes ago.”HistoryFirst identified by Stanley Milgram in 1972Stanley took photos of a subway platform during rush hour, then exactly one week later passed them out asking people who they recognizedMilgram identified that 89% of those surveyed recognized at least one person in the photoOther FindingsMilgram also recognized that some people are more recognizable than othersUnusual features help someone stand out – Milgram’s example was a girl wearing a short skirt regularly in winterIntel Research GoalsTo establish a baseline for the current state of our relationship with Familiar StrangersExpose changes to the Familiar Stranger relationship in the past 30 yearsAuthors theorize that people in constant contact with cell phones (and paying more attention to technology than surroundings) leads to a reduction in familiar strangersDiscover how familiarity affects perception of placeProcedure 1 – Milgram RevisitedLike Milgram’s subway photos, the authors took a photo of a public square in Berkeley, CA both at rush hour and at lunchThey were targeting commuters at the bus transfer station at rush hour and office workers eating lunch in the parkThey returned a week later and surveyed the population about who was recognizedResults 1Although they found less stranger familiarity than Milgram, they did find a strong recognition rate33/63 were recognized by at least one personMilgram IntelPercent recognizing at least one person89% 77.8%Average recognized4.0 3.1 3.9 at lunch2.3 at rush hourProcedure 2 – Urban Walking TourThey took 9 Bay Area residents on a walking tour through Berkeley’s Each tour was 45 minutes long and visited four distinct locations, with participants free to suggest other locationsConstitution Plaza – from study #1Berkeley Post OfficeCivic Center ParkA common inexpensive restaurantProcedure 2Tour guides were asked to rate their comfort from 1-5 and to rank their reasons:People around youPhysical characteristics (of location)Environmental attributes (weather, time)They were measuring four quantifiable factors:Amount – how many familiar peopleHistory – how familiar are peopleTurf – “my kind of place”Tribe – “my kind of people”People were also re-evaluated with a simulated “familiar stranger detector” deviceProcedure 2 ResultsComfort levels varied, more so for women than menParticipants were most comfortable at the Post Office, least at the park“People around me” was the most common factor, both positive and negativeInformation from the fictitious device was valuable in all cases, especially at the park and restaurantWhere does this lead?Jabberwocky – the familiar stranger deviceJabberwocky was guided by previous formal studies and anecdotal observationsIt captures and extends the essence of the Familiar Stranger relationshipJabberwocky ConceptSmall digital


View Full Document

UCF EEL 6788 - The Familiar Stranger

Documents in this Course
Load more
Download The Familiar Stranger
Our administrator received your request to download this document. We will send you the file to your email shortly.
Loading Unlocking...
Login

Join to view The Familiar Stranger and access 3M+ class-specific study document.

or
We will never post anything without your permission.
Don't have an account?
Sign Up

Join to view The Familiar Stranger 2 2 and access 3M+ class-specific study document.

or

By creating an account you agree to our Privacy Policy and Terms Of Use

Already a member?