UT INF 385E - Metaphors in Web Design and Navigation

Unformatted text preview:

Metaphors in Web Design and NavigationMETAPHORS: THE ORDERWHAT IS METAPHOR?www.cnet.comwww.creative.gettyimages.comwww.halfbakery.comHISTORYCooper & Reimann: About Face 2.0Cooper & Reimann ContinuedCooper & Reimann continuedSlide 11Rosenfeld & Morville: IA for World Wide WebVanderwal: Metaphor of AttractionMaglio & Matlock: Metaphors we Surf the Web byNielsen: Designing Web UsabilitySlide 16BENEFITS & BEST PRACTICESDANGERS & DOWNFALLSDANGERS & DOWNFALLS continuedSlide 20BOTTOM LINEREFERENCESMetaphors in Web Design and NavigationPresented by:Jade AndersonINF385EOctober 5, 2006METAPHORS: THE ORDERWhat is Metaphor?History & ContextDiscussion by major playersBenefitsDangersBottom LineWHAT IS METAPHOR?Relates new information to the familiarTool for communicating complex ideas and bridging complex conceptsTool for generating enthusiasmwww.cnet.comwww.creative.gettyimages.comwww.halfbakery.comHISTORYLackoff & Johnson 1980s•Metaphor integral to thoughts and actions•Not just a literary device•Metaphor is ubiquitous•E.g. theories as buildings•E.g. the mind as containerCooper & Reimann: About Face 2.0Three dominant design methods for visual interface, based on:1. Understanding2. Intuiting3. LearningCooper & Reimann ContinuedUnderstanding•Implementation-Centric Model•Must learn how program works in order to be successful•By engineers for engineers•Users would rather be successful than knowledgeableCooper & Reimann continuedIntuiting•Metaphoric Model•No need to understand mechanics of system•Definition of Intuition: “knowing something without rational use of thought.”Cooper & Reimann continuedLearning•Idiomatic Model•Definition of Idiom: “expression whose meaning is not predictable from the usual meaning of its parts”•E.g. Kick the bucket, caught red handed•E.g. Drop down menu, close box, resize function•All idioms must be learned; good ones need only be learned onceRosenfeld & Morville: IA for World Wide WebOrganizational•Familiarity with physical organization leads to understanding of virtual organization scheme•E.g. Auto dealershipFunctional•Familiarity with tasks in traditional environment leads to understanding of virtual tasks•E.g. LibraryVisual•Familiarity with images, icons, and colors of traditional object leads to connection with virtual object•E.g. YellowpagesVanderwal: Metaphor of AttractionMetaphor of Attraction•1. User searches for information•2. Results attracted or repelled•3. User attracted to meta information•4. Process continues until information found or attraction lostMaglio & Matlock: Metaphors we Surf the Web bySpatial metaphor of web•People moving toward information rather than information coming to them•Relates to how we obtain info in the real world: walk towards it, reach for it, grasp it•If people naturally grasp web as physical space, tools for navigation can be improved to exploit this connectionNielsen: Designing Web UsabilityGeographic Metaphors almost always badShopping carts are interface standard•Not shopping sleds•Even standard metaphors are not without problemsBENEFITS & BEST PRACTICESCan make the site memorableRelate new information to the familiarBetter for sites not expecting repeat visitorsDANGERS & DOWNFALLSLimiting•Sacrifice later growth for a little initial quick recognition•Suck for intermediates•Tie interfaces unnecessarily to physical world•Hold back functionality with relationships to obsolete technologyDANGERS & DOWNFALLS continuedDon’t scale well•Can’t grow with processRely on associations•Cultural•Human mind is idiosyncraticDANGERS & DOWNFALLS continuedOversimplifiedTiresomeGraphic nature can slow down siteOnly a shallow representationNo Metaphors for processesBOTTOM LINEPopularity of metaphors has wanedFew work wellMake empowering, not limitingUsability testingREFERENCESCooper, A. (2003). About Face 2.0: The Essentials of User Interface Design (2nd Edition).: Wiley Publishing, Inc.Fleming, J. (1998). Web Navigation: Designing the User Experience. Sebastopol, CA: O’Reilly Associates, Inc. Kuhn, W. (1993). Metaphors Create Theories for Users. Retrieved September 30, 2006 from http://citeseer.ist.psu.edu/332805.htmlMaglio, P. P., & Matlock, T. (1998). Metaphors we surf the Web by. Paper presented at Workshop on Personalized and Social Navigation in Information Space, Stockholm, Sweden.Nielsen, J. (2000) Designing Web Usability: The Practice of Simplicity. Berkeley, CA: New Riders Publishing branch of Peachpit Press.Norvig, P. (2004) Review of Metaphors we live by George Lakoff and Mark Johnson. Retrieved September 30, 2006 from http://www.norvig.com/mwlb.htmlPowell, T. (2002). Web Design: The Complete Reference. New York: McGraw-Hill Professional.Rosenfeld, L., & Morville, P. (2002). Information Architecture for the World Wide Web (2nd Edition). Sebastopol, CA: O’Reilly Media, Inc. Vander Wal, T. (2001, March). The Model of Attraction. Retrieved September 30, 2006, from


View Full Document

UT INF 385E - Metaphors in Web Design and Navigation

Documents in this Course
Load more
Download Metaphors in Web Design and Navigation
Our administrator received your request to download this document. We will send you the file to your email shortly.
Loading Unlocking...
Login

Join to view Metaphors in Web Design and Navigation and access 3M+ class-specific study document.

or
We will never post anything without your permission.
Don't have an account?
Sign Up

Join to view Metaphors in Web Design and Navigation 2 2 and access 3M+ class-specific study document.

or

By creating an account you agree to our Privacy Policy and Terms Of Use

Already a member?