DOC PREVIEW
Berkeley ETHSTD 196 - Air Pollutants and Bay Area School Children

This preview shows page 1-2-3-4-5 out of 15 pages.

Save
View full document
Premium Document
Do you want full access? Go Premium and unlock all 15 pages.
Access to all documents
Download any document
Ad free experience

Unformatted text preview:

Air Pollutants and Bay Area School Children Exposure and Risks Serena Chang Environmental Sciences University of California at Berkeley Abstract Due to their unique vulnerabilities children are at greater health risk from environmental exposures to pollutants than any other segment of the population Characteristics such as physical stature and behavior increase their chances of exposure For young children generally the school and home microenvironments contribute most to their exposure to environmental pollutants Thus it is important to be aware of the health risks that children potentially face as a result of their exposures at school The goal of this project was to perform crude risk assessments for Bay Area school children based on their exposure to air pollutants Air quality monitoring data from the California Air Resources Board CARB and the Bay Area Air Quality Management District BAAQMD were applied to schools located within three miles of each monitor These concentrations were compared with both cancer and noncancer benchmarks for various compounds derived from EPA reference values The results show that all the students in the study are potentially at health risk due to their exposures to air toxics while at school The probability of developing cancer from exposure to metals was low less than three per one million The highest total risk from exposure to volatile organic compounds was approximately 400 per million Because the study only focused on a select group of pollutants the actual risks faced by these children are likely to be higher In the future a more extensive monitoring network with a wider range of pollutants measured would greatly improve the accuracy and usefulness of this type of risk assessment Introduction The history of the Clean Air Act indicates that Congress made the protection of public health the sole determinant of acceptable air pollution levels Committee 1996 The Act mandates that national ambient air quality standards be set low enough to protect the health of all sensitive groups with the exception of those requiring life support systems A sensitive group is defined as one that exhibits a response to a pollutant at a lower level or to a greater degree than the average response of the general population Committee 1996 Sensitivity varies among different ethnic groups genetic backgrounds as well as age and childhood experience and development Age related differences have a significant effect on metabolism physiology developmental stage behavior and diet Goldman 1995 Title III Section 112 of the 1990 Clean Air Act Amendments CAAA defined a list of 189 hazardous air pollutants HAPs also called air toxics Kelly et al 1994 Caldwell et al 1998 They were designated as HAPs because they were known or suspected of causing cancer or other adverse human health effects or damage to ecosystems Kyle et al 1999 HAPs include certain volatile organic chemicals pesticides herbicides and radionuclides and have been associated with effects impacting the neurological reproductive and developmental systems Woodruff et al 1998 They were listed by the EPA to identify source categories for which technology based toxic air emission reduction standards would be considered US EPA 2000 elect comm Title III required regulation of routine and accidental emissions of each HAP from large industrial sources and from small commercial sources Kelly et al 1994 The greatest contributor to air pollution in the majority of the United States is the motor vehicle Compounds such as benzene an air toxic are present in gasoline and are emitted to the air when gasoline evaporates or passes through the engine as unburned fuel US EPA 2000 elect comm In addition to being emitted in unburned fuel a significant amount of automotive benzene is also released from the incomplete combustion of other compounds in gasoline such as toluene and xylene Formaldehyde acetaldehyde and 1 3 butadiene are not present in fuel but are by products of incomplete combustion Stationary point sources of air pollution include power production plants utilizing coal combustion oil refineries and industrial engineering facilities Mott et al 1997 Small businesses such as dry cleaners auto body shops and metal recycling plants also emit pollutants into the atmosphere As a group children may be even more vulnerable than adults to deleterious health effects due to their unique exposures and susceptibilities Goldman 1998 Their behavior patterns may put them in a position to receive greater exposures Compared to adults children are generally more active with higher ventilation rates Even at rest due to their rapid growth they have a higher resting metabolic rate and rate of oxygen consumption per unit body weight International Programme 1986 Thus even if concentrations of respiratory toxins in ambient air are low the large quantity of air inhaled by a child may expose the child to large doses of the toxins Gilliland et al 1999 In addition due to their physical stature and typical daily activity young children generally spend more time close to the ground Thus they experience higher exposures to pollutants emitted near ground level such as car exhaust and pollutants with high densities Mott et al 1997 The potential impacts of such exposure are exacerbated because growing lungs may be more vulnerable to permanent adverse effects Gilliland et al 1999 Children may also have decreased detoxification capacity for many chemicals because of metabolic enzyme differences present during development Weaver et al 1998 Furthermore they often do not recognize the significance of respiratory symptoms and will not limit outdoor physical activity during periods of high ambient pollution Mott et al 1997 Thus they are less likely to report exposure related symptoms Gilliland et al 1999 The physical locations of exposure should also be considered With school age children who often spend a significant amount of time at school the school s environment has a direct impact on their exposures Due to economic reasons schools are often built on relatively undesirable land where children may receive greater exposures to pollutants Bearer 1995 The time of exposure may also be a factor for example children may receive a greater exposure to ozone due to the fact that they leave school in the afternoon at a time when ozone levels may be at their highest Bates 1995 The occurrence of asthma is of particular importance when children are concerned Between 1980


View Full Document

Berkeley ETHSTD 196 - Air Pollutants and Bay Area School Children

Documents in this Course
Load more
Download Air Pollutants and Bay Area School Children
Our administrator received your request to download this document. We will send you the file to your email shortly.
Loading Unlocking...
Login

Join to view Air Pollutants and Bay Area School Children and access 3M+ class-specific study document.

or
We will never post anything without your permission.
Don't have an account?
Sign Up

Join to view Air Pollutants and Bay Area School Children and access 3M+ class-specific study document.

or

By creating an account you agree to our Privacy Policy and Terms Of Use

Already a member?