DOC PREVIEW
UT Arlington MANA 5312 - conflict stylesThomasGreenFall

This preview shows page 1-2-3 out of 9 pages.

Save
View full document
View full document
Premium Document
Do you want full access? Go Premium and unlock all 9 pages.
Access to all documents
Download any document
Ad free experience
View full document
Premium Document
Do you want full access? Go Premium and unlock all 9 pages.
Access to all documents
Download any document
Ad free experience
View full document
Premium Document
Do you want full access? Go Premium and unlock all 9 pages.
Access to all documents
Download any document
Ad free experience
Premium Document
Do you want full access? Go Premium and unlock all 9 pages.
Access to all documents
Download any document
Ad free experience

Unformatted text preview:

Importance of Conflict Management SkillsSlide 2Slide 3Slide 4StylesSlide 6Slide 7Slide 8Slide 9Importance of Conflict Management SkillsManagers spend about 21% of their time dealing with conflict.•Conflict management skills predict managerial successThomas Green Case DiscussionHis individual background and the businessHow would you describe the personalities and work styles of Green and Davis?What do you think of his performance in the first 5 months?Sources, causes, & types of conflictAgenda’s of Davis and McDonald?What should Green do now, at the end of the case?Conflict handling styles/approachesConcern for other’s outcomes Concern for own outcomesCompromisingConflict Handling & Negotiation StylesCollaborationCompetitionAccommodationAvoidanceLowLowHighHighStylesCompetition Win – lose / assertive & uncooperativeWhen might this be appropriate?Emergency situationsOne time interaction / No future interactions expectedDon’t value the relationship with other partyHowever, need to consider reputationStylesAvoidance (unassertive, withdrawal)Suppress conflict by avoiding it or the other partyWhen to use?Use when the matter is trivialWhen you need time to cool down or the other party needs to cool downThen….. approach the situation when “ready”Step 1 of a 2 step approachStylesAccommodating (Unassertive & cooperative)Put the needs/outcome of the other party above your ownWhen to use?When the issue/outcome is more important to others When you need to preserve the relationshipLose on the outcome to gain on the relationshipCautions:You may eventually “blow-up” Others may view you as a pushoverStylesCompromising Split itEach party intends to or is asked to “give-up” something: Middle ground results in incomplete satisfaction of both parties concernsWhen to use?Time pressureAfter struggling for awhile, use it as a gesture to preserve the relationshipStylesCollaborating (assertive & cooperative)“Win-win” strategyEach party seeks to fully satisfy their concerns and the concerns of the other partyMindset Searching for a mutually beneficial outcomeWhen to use?Long-term relationshipsBuild a positive reputationAlmost any


View Full Document

UT Arlington MANA 5312 - conflict stylesThomasGreenFall

Download conflict stylesThomasGreenFall
Our administrator received your request to download this document. We will send you the file to your email shortly.
Loading Unlocking...
Login

Join to view conflict stylesThomasGreenFall and access 3M+ class-specific study document.

or
We will never post anything without your permission.
Don't have an account?
Sign Up

Join to view conflict stylesThomasGreenFall 2 2 and access 3M+ class-specific study document.

or

By creating an account you agree to our Privacy Policy and Terms Of Use

Already a member?