Page 1 of 5http://spider.apa.org/ftdocs/abn/1999/november/abn1084555.html 9/15/2000Psychosocial Factors in the Course and Treatment of Bipolar Disorder Introduction to the Special Section David J. MiklowitzDepartment of Psychology University of Colorado at Boulder Lauren B. AlloyDepartment of Psychology Temple University ABSTRACTBipolar disorder is associated with high rates of relapse and high social and economic costs, even when patients are maintained on proper pharmacotherapy. The background and rationale are offered here for a series of articles that address the role of psychosocial agents in the course of bipolar disorder and psychosocial treatments as adjuncts to pharmacotherapy in the disorder's outpatient maintenance. It is argued that stressful life events and disturbances in social-familial support systems affect the cycling of the disorder against the backdrop of genetic, biological and cognitive vulnerabilities. Current models of psychosocial treatment focus on modifying the effects of social or familial risk factors as an avenue for improving the course of the disorder. Correspondence may be addressed to David J. Miklowitz, Department of Psychology, University of Colorado, Muenzinger Building, Boulder, Colorado, 80309-0345. Electronic mail may be sent to [email protected] Received: March 17, 1999 Revised: April 8, 1999 Accepted: April 8, 1999 Bipolar disorder has generally been understood as a biologically based disorder, the treatment of which is limited to pharmacotherapy. The data suggesting that bipolar disorder runs in families (for a review, see Nurnberger & Gershon, 1992 ) and that drug therapy is effective in controlling the cycling of the disorder (e.g., Keck & McElroy, 1996 ) are quite convincing. Arguably, the pharmacological treatment guidelines for bipolar disorder ( American Psychiatric Association, 1994 )–which usually involve lithium, anticonvulsants, and adjunctive agents–are better articulated than for any other psychiatric disorder. Nonetheless, bipolar disorder is by nature a recurrent illness. Longitudinal studies have suggested that even when patients are protected by state-of-the-art pharmacotherapy, about 40% relapse in 1 year, 60% in 2 years, and 73% over 5 years (e.g., Gitlin, Swendsen, Heller, & Hammen, 1995 ). Among patients who do not relapse, at least half suffer from significant residual symptoms of mood disorder ( Gitlin et al., 1995 ; Harrow, Goldberg, Grossman, & Meltzer, 1990 ). The suicide rate among bipolar patients is about 30 times greater than that of the normal population (e.g., Guze & Robins,1970 ). The disorder also has high economic and social costs. Wyatt and Henter (1995) found that the costs Journal of Abnormal Psychology © 1999 by the American Psychological Association November 1999 Vol. 108, No. 4, 555-557 For personal use only--not for distribution.Page 2 of 5http://spider.apa.org/ftdocs/abn/1999/november/abn1084555.html 9/15/2000of bipolar disorder totaled $45 billion in the United States in 1991, well after the mood-stabilizing agents became available. Occupational functioning frequently declines: About one in every three patients cannot work in the 6 months after a manic episode, and only about 20% work at their expected level ( Dion, Tohen, Anthony, & Waternaux, 1988 ). Bipolar disorder is also associated with high rates of separation and divorce and problems in the adjustment of patients' offspring (e.g., Coryell et al., 1993 ; Hammen, Burge, Burney, & Adrian, 1990 ). Because of these unfortunate realities, it is incumbent on psychopathology researchers to identify the risk and protective factors in the course of bipolar disorder. The premise of this special section is that whereas genetic and biological vulnerabilities are undeniably salient in the etiology of bipolar disorder, they cannot fully account for individual differences in the expression of the disorder or in the timing, frequency, severity, or polarity of mood disorder symptoms. As is often argued for schizophrenia, social and environmental factors may evoke or protect against biological, genetic, or cognitive vulnerabilities to bipolar disorder. In parallel, psychosocial treatments, particularly those that reduce the risks associated with individual or contextual risk factors, can be powerful adjuncts to pharmacotherapy in the long-term maintenance of bipolar patients in the community. Psychosocial Approaches to Bipolar Disorder Suggestions that stressful life events and disturbed family or marital relationships are triggers for episodes of bipolar disorder can be traced to the clinical observations of Kraepelin (1921) and of the ego analysts (e.g., Cohen, Baker, Cohen, Fromm-Reichmann, & Weigert, 1954 ). Until recently, few studies had systematically evaluated these observations within longitudinal—prospective designs. Miklowitz, Goldstein, Nuechterlein, Snyder, and Mintz (1988) found that bipolar patients who returned following a hospitalization to families who were high in expressed emotion showed negative parent-to-patient verbal behavior during family interactions, or both were highly likely to suffer a relapse during a 9-month community follow-up. Ellicott, Hammen, Gitlin, Brown and Jamison(1990) , in a 2-year follow-up of bipolar outpatients, found that patients with high levels of life stress were 4.5 times more likely to have a mood disorder relapse than patients with low levels of life stress. Malkoff-Schwartz et al. (1998) found that bipolar patients with manic episodes were more likely than those with depressive episodes to have experienced, during the 8-week interval before their episode, events that could cause disruptions in daily routines or sleep—wake cycles (social rhythms). Examples of these events included transmeridian air travel and changes in work schedules. The literature on psychosocial interventions as adjuncts to pharmacotherapy for bipolar disorder has developed in concert with this basic risk research, but few results have been published (for a review, see Craighead, Miklowitz, Vajk, & Frank, 1998 ). Most of the existing models of psychosocial treatment are family focused and psychoeducational (e.g., Clarkin, Carpenter, Hull, Wilner, & Glick,1998 ; Miklowitz & Goldstein, 1997 ) or attempt to engender, on an individual basis, strategies for minimizing the impact of social-rhythm—disrupting life events ( Frank et al., 1994 ). Overview of the Special Section Our intent in this special section is to
View Full Document
Unlocking...