DOC PREVIEW
MIT 3 052 - Assignment 4

This preview shows page 1 out of 2 pages.

Save
View full document
View full document
Premium Document
Do you want full access? Go Premium and unlock all 2 pages.
Access to all documents
Download any document
Ad free experience
Premium Document
Do you want full access? Go Premium and unlock all 2 pages.
Access to all documents
Download any document
Ad free experience

Unformatted text preview:

3.052 Nanomechanics of Materials and Biomaterials Assignment #4 Due : 04.24.07 1 3.052 Nanomechanics of Materials and Biomaterials : Spring 2007 Assignment #4 Due Date : Thursday 04.24.07 midnight on Stellar Course WebPage You are encouraged to use additional resources (e.g. journal papers, internet, etc.) but please cite them (points will be deducted for not doing so). You will need to research additional sources to answer some questions. Everything must be answered in your own words; also, do not copy phrases or sentences from the paper or podcast. + 5 extra credit for posting a message on one of the podcast message boards. 1. van der Waals Forces at Work : Gecko Feet Adhesion. Tian, et al. PNAS 2006 99: 12252-12256. a. Equation [16] gives an alternative geometry for calculating the van der Waals adhesion force. Define the assumed geometry and all constants according to the schematic in Figure 1i, and then use equation [16] to recreate the plot shown in Figure 4. b. How do Figures 5 and 6 explain the roll-in, roll-out mechanism for gecko walking? c. From the Discovery Channel movie on Professor Autumn Kellar (posted on stellar) : i. Explain what was meant by "the gecko hairs become one with the wall." ii. Explain what was meant by "the gecko is the Bermuda triangle of biology." iii. Name a number of potential applications for the fundamentals behind gecko feet adhesion. iv. What is the "Mecko Gecko"? v. Name 3 other types of biological adhesion mechanisms and the animals that use them. 2. Boundary Lubrication Podcast, Hydration Forces: Briscoe, et al., “Boundary Lubrication Under Water,” Nature 444, 9 November 2006, 191-194. a. Research 3 different definitions of "boundary lubrication" and 3 different technological applications where boundary lubrication is relevant (cite all sources). Professor Klein proposes that ions can behave as "molecular ball bearings" in boundary lubrication. Explain this analogy. b. Professor Klein mentioned that "one can not take pictures with the SFA" (like the AFM can). In a few sentences, explain why not. c. Professor Klein states that "experiments are meaningless without controls" and refers us to Figure 1 which is a control experiment. Explain in <0.5 pages how these data verify the accuracy of their experimental setup. d. The bare mica data from Figure 1 has been digitized and is posted on Stellar in an Excel file. Given the theoretical parameters provided in the Figure caption, estimate a quantitative value of the Hamaker constant in units of zJ using two separate DLVO theoretical predictions (using a linearized Poisson-Boltzmann Formulation); 1) constant surface charge and 2) constant surface potential. Include in your solutions a single plot showing the two theoretical fits compared to the experimental dataset in units of Force (mN/m) versus Distance (nm). Make sure to work out all units correctly (points will be deducted for not doing so). e. The boundary lubrication mechanism presented in the current paper differs slightly from that proposed in Klein's previous paper on fluidity of bound hydrated ionic layers (Raviv, et al. 1540 297 2002 Science). Explain how. 3. The Electrostatic Double Layer : Cartilage Podcast: Dean, et al. J. Biomech. 2006 39,14 2555.3.052 Nanomechanics of Materials and Biomaterials Assignment #4 Due : 04.24.07 2a. For Figure 6a and b, why isn't the constant compliance regime set to D=0? Explain how this nonzero distance of the constant compliance regime is determined experimentally in <0.5 pages. b. For Figures 6a and b calculate the distance at which repulsion due to conformational entropy begins for each salt concentration and summarize these values in a table. Compare the values obtained in the table for Figures 6a and 6b and explain any differences. c. Given the chemical structure and dimensions of aggrecan and GAG and the aggrecan molecular surface packing density reported in the paper, estimate the areal surface charge per unit area (C/m2) due to the GAGs at pH 5.6 (the pH at which the nanomechanical experiments were carried out). d. Given the known amino acid sequence of the protein core backbone (posted on stellar) and the aggrecan molecular surface packing density reported in the paper, estimate the areal surface charge per unit area (C/m2) due to the core protein at pH 5.6 (the pH at which the nanomechanical experiments were carried out). You may want to prepare a Matlab script to assist in the calculation. What is the percentage contribution to the total areal areal surface charge per unit area. e. Based on your answers to parts c. and d., can the linearized Poisson-Boltzmann Debye-Huckel formulation be employed to predict the EDL force? Why or why


View Full Document

MIT 3 052 - Assignment 4

Documents in this Course
SURFACES

SURFACES

30 pages

Load more
Download Assignment 4
Our administrator received your request to download this document. We will send you the file to your email shortly.
Loading Unlocking...
Login

Join to view Assignment 4 and access 3M+ class-specific study document.

or
We will never post anything without your permission.
Don't have an account?
Sign Up

Join to view Assignment 4 2 2 and access 3M+ class-specific study document.

or

By creating an account you agree to our Privacy Policy and Terms Of Use

Already a member?