DOC PREVIEW
MIT 3 052 - Investigating the Origins of Protein-Surface Adsorption

This preview shows page 1-2-19-20 out of 20 pages.

Save
View full document
View full document
Premium Document
Do you want full access? Go Premium and unlock all 20 pages.
Access to all documents
Download any document
Ad free experience
View full document
Premium Document
Do you want full access? Go Premium and unlock all 20 pages.
Access to all documents
Download any document
Ad free experience
View full document
Premium Document
Do you want full access? Go Premium and unlock all 20 pages.
Access to all documents
Download any document
Ad free experience
View full document
Premium Document
Do you want full access? Go Premium and unlock all 20 pages.
Access to all documents
Download any document
Ad free experience
Premium Document
Do you want full access? Go Premium and unlock all 20 pages.
Access to all documents
Download any document
Ad free experience

Unformatted text preview:

Investigating the Origins of Protein-Surface Adsorption:Ellipsometry: A Macroscopic Measure of Protein Surface AdhesionForce Microscopy: A Microscopic Measure of Protein AdhesionProtein vs SubstrateSAM-SAM & Protein-Protein InteractionsProtein-SAM InteractionsNot All Proteins Were Created EqualThe Importance of ConformationSlide 9Effect of s and L on Surface Interaction ForcesThe Effect of s and L on Protein Adhesion to PEOThe Effect of the Substrate on the SAM ConformationFibrinogen AdhesionTip-Surface Electrostatics: the Effect of Ions in SolutionTip-Surface Electrostatics: the Effects of Ionic Strength and Molecular WeightPolymer ArchitecturesEffect of Chain Architecture on Protein AdsorptionMeasuring Protein Adhesion with the Surface Force ApparatusCompression Leads to Protein-Surface BindingConclusionsInvestigating the Origins of Protein-Surface Adsorption:Experimental ResultsEllipsometry: A Macroscopic Measure of Protein Surface AdhesionitrRparallel / RperpendicularEi = Ellipsometery measures theRatio of the electric fields ofThe reflectid waves parallel and perpendicular to theInterface; from this you mayExtrapolate the thickness of The interfaceAlternatively: ellipsometry Measures the abruptness ofChange in refractive index From the surrounding medium (air, e.g.) to the substrate, and from this extrapolates the film thicknessForce Microscopy: A Microscopic Measure of Protein Adhesion •Protein is covalently attached to the probe tip•Adhesion is measured on various substrates/SAMs of different degrees of hydrophilicityProtein vs Substrate•Three different blood plasma proteins studied: Albumin (Alb), Immunoglobulin G (IgG), and Fibrinogen (Fib)•Four different SAMs studied; in order of increasing hydrophilicity: -CH3, -OH, -NH2, -COOH •Protein-protein, protein-SAM, and SAM-SAM interactions comparedKidoaki, S.; Matsuda, T. Langmuir 1999, 15, 7639-7646.The experiment:SAM-SAM & Protein-Protein InteractionsKidoaki, S.; Matsuda, T. Langmuir 1999, 15, 7639-7646.Protein-SAM InteractionsSchematic of protein adhesionExperimental resultsKidoaki, S.; Matsuda, T. Langmuir 1999, 15, 7639-7646.Not All Proteins Were Created Equal•In order of increasing SAM affinity for each protein:–Alb, IgG: -CH3 >> (-OH, -NH2) > -COOH–Fib:-CH3 >> -OH > -NH2 > -COOH–Fib > Alb, IgG on all surfaces except -COOHKidoaki, S.; Matsuda, T. Langmuir 1999, 15, 7639-7646.The Importance of Conformation* The extent of protein interaction depends not only on the type of SAM, but also on the SAM conformationKidoaki, S.; Nakayama, Y.; Matsuda, T. Langmuir 2001, 17, 1080-1087.Re: Methods for Counteracting Protein-Surface Interaction with Polymer Coatings•Dense polymer coatings (low )•Long polymer chains (large N)d R  NUout may be manipulated by varying N or  Uin is primarily controlled by varying Effect of  and L on Surface Interaction Forces•The polymer chains in a brush are not fully extended: •There is a point at which the polymer layer becomes incompressible: Dowhere D’ = Dexperimental andPMMA)for (0.6 1contourmequilibriuLLPMMA)MW high for (0.8 1eqLDYamaoto, Shinpei; Muhammad, Ejaz; Yoshinobu, Tsujii; Matsumoto, Mutsuo; Fukuda, Takeshi. Macromolecules 2000, 33, 5602-5607.Yamaoto, Shinpei; Muhammad, Ejaz; Yoshinobu, Tsujii; Fukuda, Takeshi. Macromolecules 2000, 33, 5608-5612. oD D'D0.5)-0.3(n nThe Effect of  and L on Protein Adhesion to PEO•At very high surface densities , SAMs will resist adsorption of all types of proteins, with universal resistance achieved at lower  for higher molecular weight (larger L) SAMs•L is not as influential as  •The highest L at optimum  is most effective at protein resistance•Adhesion is temperature-dependentJeon, S. I.; Lee, J. H.; Andrade, J. D.; De Gennes, P. G. J. Colloid and Interface Sci., 142 (1), 149-158 (March1, 1991).Jeon, S. I.; Andrade, J. D. J. Colloid and Interface Sci., 142 (1), 159-166 (March 1, 1991).Prime, K. L.; Whitesides, G. M. J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1993, 115 10714-10721.The Effect of the Substrate on the SAM Conformation•PEO on gold in aqueous solution is predominantly in a helical conformation stabilized by H-bonding•On silver, however, the binding sites are so close that the helix is sterically hinderedFeldman, K.; Haehner, G.; Spencer, N. D.; Grunze, M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1999, 121, 10134-10141.Fibrinogen AdhesionMicaC16H33-AuEG3-AuEG3-AgFeldman, K.; Haehner, G.; Spencer, N. D.; Grunze, M. J. A. Chem. Soc. 1999, 121, 10134-10141.Feldman, K.; Haehner, G.; Spencer, N. D.; Grunze, M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1999, 121, 10134-10141.Tip-Surface Electrostatics: the Effect of Ions in SolutionSi3N4 tip + EG3C16 tip + EG3DI H2OPBSAuAgFeldman, K.; Haehner, G.; Spencer, N. D.; Grunze, M. J. A. Chem. Soc. 1999, 121, 10134-10141.Feldman, K.; Haehner, G.; Spencer, N. D.; Grunze, M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1999, 121, 10134-10141.Tip-Surface Electrostatics: the Effects of Ionic Strength and Molecular WeightFeldman, K.; Haehner, G.; Spencer, N. D.; Grunze, M. J. A. Chem. Soc. 1999, 121, 10134-10141.Feldman, K.; Haehner, G.; Spencer, N. D.; Grunze, M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1999, 121, 10134-10141.Polymer ArchitecturesLinear CombStarEffect of Chain Architecture on Protein AdsorptionMayes, A. M.; Irvine, D. J.; Griffith, L. G. Mat. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc. 1998, 530, 73-84.In contrast to linear polymers, the center mass for star polymers lies at some distance away from the surface.This results in a much more energetically favored state for protein adhesion at the surface, once diffusion through the polymer layer is achievedMeasuring Protein Adhesion with the Surface Force ApparatusSheth, S. R.; Leckband, D. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 94, 8399-8404 (August 1997).Compression Leads to Protein-Surface Binding•A: Protein resistance still observed at low compressive loads ( <4kT )•B: Under sufficient compressive loads ( >4kT ) attractive interactions dominateNote: Derjaguin approximation: kTRF22per chainSheth, S. R.; Leckband, D. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 94, 8399-8404 (August 1997).Conclusions•Design of biomaterials is challenged by the complicated, interrelated factors involved in of achieving biocompatibility: i.e. protein resistance vs cell specificity•Because they are easily tailored to meet specific chemical needs, polymers are often used as coatings on compliance-matched devices•Optimization of polymer coatings is a delicate balance among a) size, architecture,


View Full Document

MIT 3 052 - Investigating the Origins of Protein-Surface Adsorption

Documents in this Course
SURFACES

SURFACES

30 pages

Load more
Download Investigating the Origins of Protein-Surface Adsorption
Our administrator received your request to download this document. We will send you the file to your email shortly.
Loading Unlocking...
Login

Join to view Investigating the Origins of Protein-Surface Adsorption and access 3M+ class-specific study document.

or
We will never post anything without your permission.
Don't have an account?
Sign Up

Join to view Investigating the Origins of Protein-Surface Adsorption 2 2 and access 3M+ class-specific study document.

or

By creating an account you agree to our Privacy Policy and Terms Of Use

Already a member?