DOC PREVIEW
UT Dallas CS 6360 - Elmasri_6e_Ch16

This preview shows page 1-2-3-20-21-22-41-42-43 out of 43 pages.

Save
View full document
Premium Document
Do you want full access? Go Premium and unlock all 43 pages.
Access to all documents
Download any document
Ad free experience

Unformatted text preview:

Chapter 16 Relational Database Design Algorithms and Further Dependencies Copyright 2011 Pearson Education Inc Publishing as Pearson Addison Wesley DESIGNING A SET OF RELATIONS 1 The Approach of Relational Synthesis Bottom up Design Assumes that all possible functional dependencies are known First constructs a minimal set of FDs Then applies algorithms that construct a target set of 3NF or BCNF relations Additional criteria may be needed to ensure the the set of relations in a relational database are satisfactory Copyright 2011 Ramez Elmasri and Shamkant Navathe DESIGNING A SET OF RELATIONS 2 Goals Lossless join property a must Dependency preservation property Algorithm 16 3 tests for general losslessness Algorithm 16 5 decomposes a relation into BCNF components by sacrificing the dependency preservation Additional normal forms 4NF based on multi valued dependencies 5NF based on join dependencies Copyright 2011 Ramez Elmasri and Shamkant Navathe 1 Properties of Relational Decompositions 1 Relation Decomposition and Insufficiency of Normal Forms Universal Relation Schema A relation schema R A1 A2 An that includes all the attributes of the database Universal relation assumption Every attribute name is unique Copyright 2011 Ramez Elmasri and Shamkant Navathe Properties of Relational Decompositions 2 Relation Decomposition and Insufficiency of Normal Forms cont Decomposition The process of decomposing the universal relation schema R into a set of relation schemas D R1 R2 Rm that will become the relational database schema by using the functional dependencies Attribute preservation condition Each attribute in R will appear in at least one relation schema Ri in the decomposition so that no attributes are lost Copyright 2011 Ramez Elmasri and Shamkant Navathe Properties of Relational Decompositions 2 Another goal of decomposition is to have each individual relation Ri in the decomposition D be in BCNF or 3NF Additional properties of decomposition are needed to prevent from generating spurious tuples Copyright 2011 Ramez Elmasri and Shamkant Navathe Properties of Relational Decompositions 3 Dependency Preservation Property of a Decomposition Definition Given a set of dependencies F on R the projection of F on Ri denoted by pRi F where Ri is a subset of R is the set of dependencies X Y in F such that the attributes in X Y are all contained in Ri Hence the projection of F on each relation schema Ri in the decomposition D is the set of functional dependencies in F the closure of F such that all their left and right hand side attributes are in Ri Copyright 2011 Ramez Elmasri and Shamkant Navathe Properties of Relational Decompositions 4 Dependency Preservation Property of a Decomposition cont Dependency Preservation Property A decomposition D R1 R2 Rm of R is dependency preserving with respect to F if the union of the projections of F on each Ri in D is equivalent to F that is R1 F Rm F F See examples in Fig 15 13a and Fig 15 12 Claim 1 It is always possible to find a dependencypreserving decomposition D with respect to F such that each relation Ri in D is in 3nf Copyright 2011 Ramez Elmasri and Shamkant Navathe Properties of Relational Decompositions 5 Lossless Non additive Join Property of a Decomposition Definition Lossless join property a decomposition D R1 R2 Rm of R has the lossless nonadditive join property with respect to the set of dependencies F on R if for every relation state r of R that satisfies F the following holds where is the natural join of all the relations in D R1 r Rm r r Note The word loss in lossless refers to loss of information not to loss of tuples In fact for loss of information a better term is addition of spurious information Copyright 2011 Ramez Elmasri and Shamkant Navathe Properties of Relational Decompositions 6 Lossless Non additive Join Property of a Decomposition cont Algorithm 16 3 Testing for Lossless Join Property Input A universal relation R a decomposition D R1 R2 Rm of R and a set F of functional dependencies 1 Create an initial matrix S with one row i for each relation Ri in D and one column j for each attribute Aj in R 2 Set S i j bij for all matrix entries each bij is a distinct symbol associated with indices i j 3 For each row i representing relation schema Ri for each column j representing attribute Aj if relation Ri includes attribute Aj then set S i j aj each aj is a distinct symbol associated with index j CONTINUED on NEXT SLIDE Copyright 2011 Ramez Elmasri and Shamkant Navathe Properties of Relational Decompositions 7 Lossless Non additive Join Property of a Decomposition cont Algorithm 16 3 Testing for Lossless Join Property 4 Repeat the following loop until a complete loop execution results in no changes to S for each functional dependency X Y in F for all rows in S which have the same symbols in the columns corresponding to attributes in X make the symbols in each column that correspond to an attribute in Y be the same in all these rows as follows If any of the rows has an a symbol for the column set the other rows to that same a symbol in the column If no a symbol exists for the attribute in any of the rows choose one of the b symbols that appear in one of the rows for the attribute and set the other rows to that same b symbol in the column 5 If a row is made up entirely of a symbols then the decomposition has the lossless join property otherwise it does not Copyright 2011 Ramez Elmasri and Shamkant Navathe Properties of Relational Decompositions 8 Lossless nonadditive join test for n ary decompositions a Case 1 Decomposition of EMP PROJ into EMP PROJ1 and EMP LOCS fails test b A decomposition of EMP PROJ that has the lossless join property Copyright 2011 Ramez Elmasri and Shamkant Navathe Properties of Relational Decompositions 8 Lossless nonadditive join test for n ary decompositions c Case 2 Decomposition of EMP PROJ into EMP PROJECT and WORKS ON satisfies test Copyright 2011 Ramez Elmasri and Shamkant Navathe Properties of Relational Decompositions 9 Testing Binary Decompositions for Lossless Join Property Binary Decomposition Decomposition of a relation R into two relations PROPERTY LJ1 lossless join test for binary decompositions A decomposition D R1 R2 of R has the lossless join property with respect to a set of functional dependencies F on R if and only if either The f d R1 R2 R1 R2 is in F or The f d R1 R2 R2 R1 is in F Copyright 2011 Ramez Elmasri and Shamkant Navathe Properties of Relational Decompositions 10 Successive


View Full Document

UT Dallas CS 6360 - Elmasri_6e_Ch16

Documents in this Course
Ch22(1)

Ch22(1)

44 pages

Ch21

Ch21

38 pages

Ch19

Ch19

46 pages

Ch18

Ch18

25 pages

Ch17

Ch17

21 pages

Ch15

Ch15

42 pages

Ch09

Ch09

42 pages

Ch05

Ch05

34 pages

Ch22

Ch22

45 pages

Ch21

Ch21

38 pages

Ch19

Ch19

48 pages

Ch18

Ch18

24 pages

Ch17

Ch17

22 pages

Ch16

Ch16

17 pages

Ch15

Ch15

42 pages

Ch09

Ch09

42 pages

Ch08

Ch08

39 pages

Ch07

Ch07

34 pages

Ch06

Ch06

43 pages

Ch05

Ch05

34 pages

Ch04

Ch04

39 pages

Ch03(2)

Ch03(2)

36 pages

Ch02

Ch02

33 pages

Ch08

Ch08

28 pages

Ch07

Ch07

31 pages

Ch06

Ch06

43 pages

Ch05

Ch05

39 pages

Ch04(1)

Ch04(1)

39 pages

Ch03(1)

Ch03(1)

38 pages

Ch02

Ch02

38 pages

Ch01

Ch01

36 pages

Ch24

Ch24

36 pages

Ch21

Ch21

54 pages

Ch19

Ch19

48 pages

Ch18

Ch18

24 pages

Ch17

Ch17

22 pages

Ch03(1)

Ch03(1)

38 pages

Ch02

Ch02

38 pages

Ch01

Ch01

36 pages

Ch24

Ch24

36 pages

Ch21

Ch21

54 pages

Ch19

Ch19

48 pages

Ch18

Ch18

24 pages

Ch17

Ch17

22 pages

Ch08

Ch08

28 pages

Ch07

Ch07

31 pages

Ch06

Ch06

43 pages

Ch05

Ch05

39 pages

Ch04(1)

Ch04(1)

39 pages

Ch08

Ch08

39 pages

Ch07

Ch07

40 pages

Ch06

Ch06

47 pages

Ch05

Ch05

41 pages

Ch04

Ch04

43 pages

Ch03

Ch03

41 pages

Ch02

Ch02

38 pages

Ch01

Ch01

36 pages

Ch21

Ch21

54 pages

Ch19

Ch19

51 pages

Ch18

Ch18

24 pages

Ch08

Ch08

39 pages

Ch07

Ch07

40 pages

Ch06

Ch06

47 pages

Ch05

Ch05

41 pages

Ch04

Ch04

43 pages

Ch03

Ch03

41 pages

Ch02

Ch02

38 pages

Ch01

Ch01

36 pages

Ch21

Ch21

54 pages

Ch19

Ch19

51 pages

Ch18

Ch18

24 pages

Ch17

Ch17

25 pages

lab-manual

lab-manual

215 pages

Ch08

Ch08

39 pages

Ch07

Ch07

40 pages

Ch06

Ch06

47 pages

Ch05

Ch05

41 pages

Ch04

Ch04

43 pages

Ch03

Ch03

41 pages

Ch02

Ch02

38 pages

Ch01

Ch01

36 pages

Ch21

Ch21

54 pages

Ch19

Ch19

51 pages

Ch17

Ch17

25 pages

Ch21

Ch21

54 pages

Ch19

Ch19

51 pages

Ch18

Ch18

24 pages

Ch17

Ch17

25 pages

Ch08

Ch08

39 pages

Ch07

Ch07

40 pages

Ch06

Ch06

47 pages

Ch05

Ch05

41 pages

Ch04

Ch04

43 pages

Ch03

Ch03

41 pages

Ch02

Ch02

38 pages

Ch01

Ch01

36 pages

Ch04(1)

Ch04(1)

43 pages

Ch07

Ch07

40 pages

Ch03

Ch03

42 pages

Ch01

Ch01

36 pages

Ch02

Ch02

38 pages

Ch05

Ch05

41 pages

Ch06

Ch06

47 pages

Ch08

Ch08

39 pages

Ch17

Ch17

25 pages

Ch18

Ch18

24 pages

Ch09

Ch09

42 pages

Ch21

Ch21

54 pages

Ch19

Ch19

51 pages

Ch21

Ch21

54 pages

Ch19

Ch19

51 pages

Ch18

Ch18

24 pages

Ch17

Ch17

25 pages

Ch09

Ch09

42 pages

Ch08

Ch08

39 pages

Ch07

Ch07

40 pages

Ch06

Ch06

47 pages

Ch05

Ch05

41 pages

Ch04(1)

Ch04(1)

43 pages

Ch03

Ch03

42 pages

Ch02

Ch02

38 pages

Ch01

Ch01

36 pages

Load more
Download Elmasri_6e_Ch16
Our administrator received your request to download this document. We will send you the file to your email shortly.
Loading Unlocking...
Login

Join to view Elmasri_6e_Ch16 and access 3M+ class-specific study document.

or
We will never post anything without your permission.
Don't have an account?
Sign Up

Join to view Elmasri_6e_Ch16 and access 3M+ class-specific study document.

or

By creating an account you agree to our Privacy Policy and Terms Of Use

Already a member?