DOC PREVIEW
Purdue ENGR 13100 - HW03_MEADraft1_18

This preview shows page 1 out of 2 pages.

Save
View full document
View full document
Premium Document
Do you want full access? Go Premium and unlock all 2 pages.
Access to all documents
Download any document
Ad free experience
Premium Document
Do you want full access? Go Premium and unlock all 2 pages.
Access to all documents
Download any document
Ad free experience

Unformatted text preview:

To: Devin Dalton, CEOFrom: Engineering Team 18RE: Shipping IssuesDate: August 30, 2013The direct user, the Logistics Manager, needs a clear and effective way to rank the available shipping companies. This ranking will put one company above the rest, one that will be the most reliable and best overall choice for his company, D. Dalton Technologies, to use when shipping their products from Ceramica to Bowman in keeping with their just-in-time strategy. Along with a procedure the Logistics Manager needs an example of the procedure carried out on sample data and reasoning for each step in the procedure.Our procedure is designed to first eliminate the companies that are the most consistently late, and then rank the remaining companies based off of how late they are when they are late.It is appropriate to use our procedure when there is a sufficient amount of data to accurately represent each company (for example, 100 shipping times). We are assuming the data given for each shipping company is representative of their normal delivery delays.The procedure is as follows:1. Calculate the total number times that each of the shipping companies delivered their package late by taking the number of data points that are greater than 0 in a program that can analyze data such as Excel.2. Eliminate the bottom half of the shipping company options rounding down (in the sample data, the bottom two). These, in order of ascending number of times late, will be given the bottom rankings: No. 3 and 4 in the sample data. If there are only two shipping companies to decide between, the procedure is complete here.3. Using only the data for when the shipment actually arrived late (non-zero data points), calculate the median for the remaining companies by putting the data points in numerical order and finding the middle point (average the two middle points if you have an even number of data points).4. In order of ascending median time late, assign each of the remaining companies the ranking 1, 2, 3… etc with the number 1 company being the optimal choice.Here is a sample procedure carried out:1. Upon calculations in Excel, we find that IHE delivered 155 late packages, DS 219 late packages, SC 176 late packages, and UE 241 late packages.2. We eliminate DS and UE for having the most late packages, giving UE a ranking of 4th and DS a ranking of 3rd.3. We sort IHE and SC in order of descending hours late, and remove all 0’s. Then we find the median, or middle point of each. This is 1.57 hours for IHE and 1.29 hours late for SC.4. SC has the lowest median hours late, so they are ranked 1st. Next is IHE who is given the rank of 2nd.5. Our complete rankings are: 1st SC, 2nd IHE, 3rd DS, and 4th UE.Our reasoning for steps 1 and 2 is that the most important factor is being on time, as hours or even minutes can make the difference. Therefore, we eliminate the half of the companies that are most consistently late. Our reasoning for steps 3 and 4 is that we know the shipping companies will be late sometimes, so we should choose the company that tends to be the least late when it does happen.To: Devin Dalton, CEOFrom: Engineering Team 18RE: Shipping Issues Date: August 30, 2013The direct user, the Logistics Manager, needs a clear and effective way to rank the available shipping companies. This ranking will put one company above the rest, one that will be the most reliable and best overall choice for his company, D. Dalton Technologies, to use when shipping their products from Ceramica to Bowman in keeping with their just-in-time strategy. Along with a procedure the Logistics Manager needs an example of the procedure carried out on sample data and reasoning for each step in the procedure. Our procedure is designed to first eliminate the companies that are the most consistently late, and then rank the remaining companies based off of how late they are when they are late.It is appropriate to use our procedure when there is a sufficient amount of data to accurately represent each company (for example, 100 shipping times). We are assuming the data given for each shipping company is representative of their normal delivery delays. The procedure is as follows:1. Calculate the total number times that each of the shipping companies delivered their package late by taking the number of data points that are greater than 0 in aprogram that can analyze data such as Excel.2. Eliminate the bottom half of the shipping company options rounding down (in the sample data, the bottom two). These, in order of ascending number of times late,will be given the bottom rankings: No. 3 and 4 in the sample data. If there are only two shipping companies to decide between, the procedure is complete here.3. Using only the data for when the shipment actually arrived late (non-zero data points), calculate the median for the remaining companies by putting the data points in numerical order and finding the middle point (average the two middle points if you have an even number of data points).Page 1 of 24. In order of ascending median time late, assign each of the remaining companies the ranking 1, 2, 3… etc with the number 1 company being the optimal choice.Here is a sample procedure carried out:1. Upon calculations in Excel, we find that IHE delivered 155 late packages, DS 219late packages, SC 176 late packages, and UE 241 late packages.2. We eliminate DS and UE for having the most late packages, giving UE a ranking of 4th and DS a ranking of 3rd.3. We sort IHE and SC in order of descending hours late, and remove all 0’s. Then we find the median, or middle point of each. This is 1.57 hours for IHE and 1.29 hours late for SC. 4. SC has the lowest median hours late, so they are ranked 1st. Next is IHE who is given the rank of 2nd.5. Our complete rankings are: 1st SC, 2nd IHE, 3rd DS, and 4th UE.Our reasoning for steps 1 and 2 is that the most important factor is being on time, as hours or even minutes can make the difference. Therefore, we eliminate the half of the companies that are most consistently late. Our reasoning for steps 3 and 4 is that we know the shipping companies will be late sometimes, so we should choose the company that tends to be the least late when it does happen.Page 2 of


View Full Document

Purdue ENGR 13100 - HW03_MEADraft1_18

Download HW03_MEADraft1_18
Our administrator received your request to download this document. We will send you the file to your email shortly.
Loading Unlocking...
Login

Join to view HW03_MEADraft1_18 and access 3M+ class-specific study document.

or
We will never post anything without your permission.
Don't have an account?
Sign Up

Join to view HW03_MEADraft1_18 2 2 and access 3M+ class-specific study document.

or

By creating an account you agree to our Privacy Policy and Terms Of Use

Already a member?