Berkeley INTEGBI 200B - The Tempo of Macroevolution: Patterns of Diversification and Extinction

Unformatted text preview:

Spring, 2011 Phylogenetics 200B The Tempo of Macroevolution: Patterns of Diversification and Extinction During the semester we have been consider various aspects parameters associated with biodiversity. Current usage stems from 1980's (first appears in Biosis in 1988 with 4 references). (1) Number of species present (2) Genetic diversity & ecological diversity (3) Three levels - genetic (within species), species (number), ecological (community) diversity. (4) What is this for lineage-based biology? Ultimately, we are concerned with the origination and extinction of past and present lineages. The fractural nature of these lineages has been discussed before – base pairs, genes, chromosomes, cells and ultra-structure, tissues and organs, organisms, populations, species, etc. However, studies of biodiversity are typically co-opted by ecologists or turned into conservation directed research. The debate as to how to best understand biodiversity often divides into 3 camps. Systematists typically argue for the primacy of phylogenetic rankings, while ecologists argue for protection at the level of populations or ecosystems, and evolutionary biologists urging more attention for the factors that enhance adaptation and biodiversity. Tempo and Mode in Evolutionary Thought Darwin’s embrace of Lyellian uniformitarianism meant that small-scale, observable change in modern populations was responsible for all evolutionary changes in the history of life. As Gould pointed out, this limited paleontology to documenting the history of life without providing any novel evolutionary theory. G. G. Simpson countered this view of paleontology in his classic work, Tempo and Mode in Evolution published in 1944. Simpson pointed out that both tempo (pattern) and mode (processes and causes) were unique to the discipline of paleontology and that modes could be recognized by studying the tempo of evolution. However, in the end he regarded tempo and modes as components of microevolution as he was undulySpring, 2011 Phylogenetics 200B influenced by the New Synthesis. However, patterns of diversification were again brought into prominence with the advent of cladistics. From: www.talkorigins.org/faqs/macroevolution.htmlSpring, 2011 Phylogenetics 200B From Baker et al. (2005) Reconstructing the tempo and mode of evolution in an extinct clade of birds with ancient DNA: The giant moas of New Zealand. PNASSpring, 2011 Phylogenetics 200B Salemi & Vandamme (2000) Tempo and Mode of Human and Simian T-Lymphotropic Virus (HTLV/STLV) Evolution Revealed by Analyses of Full-Genome Sequences Other Diversification patterns: From: Krug et al. (2009) – Earth’s 1st order biodiversity pattern.Spring, 2011 Phylogenetics 200B Latitudinal diversity gradients (LDG) – Krug et al (2009) that LDG dates from Paleozoic and is characterized by a decrease in richness of species and higher taxa from the equator to the poles. Furthermore, LDGs are produced by geographic trends in origination, extinction, and dispersal over evolutionary timescales. Extinction rates are lower in polar latitudes than in temperate zones and thus cannot create the observed gradient alone. They may, however, help to explain why origination and immigration are evidently damped in higher latitudes. Authors suggest that species require more resources in higher latitudes, for the seasonality of primary productivity increases by more than an order of magnitude from equatorial to polar regions. Higher-latitude species are generalists that, unlike potential immigrants, are adapted to garner the large share of resources required for incumbency in those regions. When resources are opened up by extinctions, lineages spread chiefly poleward and chiefly through diversification. Ecological limits (Rabosky 2009) – Species richness varies dramatically among groups of organisms, yet the causes of this variation remain poorly understood. Variation in species-level diversification rates may partially explain differential species richness among clades, but older clades should also be more diverse, because they will have had more time to accumulate species. Table 1: Data sets considered in this study Lineage Clades p P Data source Angiosperm clades 48 -.12 .46 Magallon & Sanderson 2001 Insect orders 25 .54 <.01 McPeek and Brown 2007 Avian tribes 86 -.19 .08 Ricklefs 2006 Mammalian orders 18 . .04 .87 McPeek and Brown 2007 Teleost fish orders 29 -.07 .70 McPeek and Brown 2007 Note: Data sets include the number of clades included in the analysis, the Spearman correlation coefficient r between (log) species richness and clade age, and data source (raw data are given in table A1 in the online edition of the American Naturalist). Two-tailed P values.Spring, 2011 Phylogenetics 200B From (Rabosky 2009) However, studies that have investigated this question have reached dramatically different conclusions: no such age-diversity relationship, whereas a recent and more inclusive study reported that clade age and not diversification rate explains the variation in species richness among animal taxa. Using a model-based approach that controls for variation in diversification rates among clades. Rabosky finds that species richness is effectively independent of clade age in four of five data sets. Even extreme among-clade variation in diversification rates cannot account for the absence of a positive age-diversity relationship in angiosperms, birds, and teleost fishes. Alternative Rabosky proposes that ecological limits on clade growth, such as geographic area, appear to mediate temporal declines in diversification within higher taxa. How does this square with the observation that biodiversity is not evenly distributed. Extremely high biological diversity tends to be clumped in areas with historically high rates of geological change. Examples include, tropical South America, Indo-Malaysian region, Rift Lakes of Africa, etc. Recent glaciations in the northern hemisphere have also produced recent changes in communities. Extinction (Purvis 2008) – Species extinction is both a key process throughout the history of life and a pressing concern regarding present-day biodiversity. These twoSpring, 2011 Phylogenetics 200B applications are typically studied by separate communities using different approaches.


View Full Document

Berkeley INTEGBI 200B - The Tempo of Macroevolution: Patterns of Diversification and Extinction

Documents in this Course
Quiz 2

Quiz 2

4 pages

Quiz 1

Quiz 1

4 pages

Quiz 1

Quiz 1

4 pages

Quiz

Quiz

2 pages

Quiz 1

Quiz 1

4 pages

Quiz

Quiz

4 pages

Load more
Download The Tempo of Macroevolution: Patterns of Diversification and Extinction
Our administrator received your request to download this document. We will send you the file to your email shortly.
Loading Unlocking...
Login

Join to view The Tempo of Macroevolution: Patterns of Diversification and Extinction and access 3M+ class-specific study document.

or
We will never post anything without your permission.
Don't have an account?
Sign Up

Join to view The Tempo of Macroevolution: Patterns of Diversification and Extinction 2 2 and access 3M+ class-specific study document.

or

By creating an account you agree to our Privacy Policy and Terms Of Use

Already a member?