DOC PREVIEW
Berkeley INTEGBI 200B - Quiz 1

This preview shows page 1 out of 4 pages.

Save
View full document
View full document
Premium Document
Do you want full access? Go Premium and unlock all 4 pages.
Access to all documents
Download any document
Ad free experience
Premium Document
Do you want full access? Go Premium and unlock all 4 pages.
Access to all documents
Download any document
Ad free experience

Unformatted text preview:

Page 1 Name _________________________ Integrative Biology 200B Spring 2005 "PRINCIPLES OF PHYLOGENETICS: ECOLOGY AND EVOLUTION" Quiz 1 1. (20 points -- answer only 4 of these 5 -- your choice) Briefly describe the following concepts; giving the most important and/or controversial points, and the assumptions that must be made a. the relationship between phylogenetics & conservation? b. phylogenetic constraints c. concentrated change test (Maddison's test) d. codon usage bias e. rank-free classification 2. ((20 points -- answer only 4 of these 5 -- your choice) Briefly contrast the following pairs ofPage 2 Name _________________________ terms (Use diagrams if they help): a. Parsimony vs. maximum likelihood reconstruction of ancestral states (you can just consider discrete traits in your answer) b. Linear vs. squared change parsimony c. paralogy vs orthology d. neoteny vs. progenesis e. adaptation vs. exaptation 3. Short answers (20 points): a. Assume that a trait evolves by Brownian motion on the two trees below (next page). In your own words, how would you describe the pattern of trait evolution, and how does it differ between the two trees? (A) Branch lengths proportional to time (B) All branch lengths equal (terminal taxa are extant)Page 3 Name _________________________ (B) b. A simple measure of conservatism for a binary trait is the number of reconstructed changes on a tree. How can the significance of this number be tested? What is the underlying null hypothesis? c. When using parsimony to reconstruct ancestral states of discrete characters, why does it matter how you optimize transformations on the cladogram? What can make optimization equivocal? d. Describe the components of a maximum likelihood analysis and the likelihood ratio test for comparing alternative hypotheses. 4. (15 points) What sort of comparative method or approach would you apply to the following evolutionary questions (e.g., what assumptions would you make, what kind of data would you require, how would you generate a null hypothesis, how would you judge statistical significance?): a. Are fleshy-fruited plants more likely to evolve a dioecious condition (i.e., separate sexes on different individuals)?Page 4 Name _________________________ b. Is leg length correlated with running speed in ungulates? c. Is there a trend towards increasing body size within lineages of mammals (Cope's Rule)? [Bonus: 5 points extra credit] Flowerella, a clade with 75 species, exhibits considerable interspecific diversity in flower size, and species are pollinated by one of three vectors: bees, bats and hummingbirds. Thanks to your colleagues in the herbarium, you have an excellent, fully resolved phylogeny for the group. How could you go about constructing a comparative test of the hypothesis that flower size evolves in association with shifts in pollination mode? ____________________________________________________________________________ [end


View Full Document

Berkeley INTEGBI 200B - Quiz 1

Documents in this Course
Quiz 2

Quiz 2

4 pages

Quiz 1

Quiz 1

4 pages

Quiz

Quiz

2 pages

Quiz 1

Quiz 1

4 pages

Quiz

Quiz

4 pages

Load more
Download Quiz 1
Our administrator received your request to download this document. We will send you the file to your email shortly.
Loading Unlocking...
Login

Join to view Quiz 1 and access 3M+ class-specific study document.

or
We will never post anything without your permission.
Don't have an account?
Sign Up

Join to view Quiz 1 2 2 and access 3M+ class-specific study document.

or

By creating an account you agree to our Privacy Policy and Terms Of Use

Already a member?