PowerPoint PresentationSlide 2Slide 3Slide 4Slide 5Slide 6Slide 7Slide 8Slide 9Slide 10Slide 11Slide 12Slide 13Slide 14Slide 15Slide 16Slide 17Slide 18Slide 19Slide 20Slide 21Slide 22Slide 23Slide 24Slide 25Slide 26Slide 27Slide 28Slide 29Slide 30Slide 31Slide 32Slide 33Slide 34Slide 35Slide 36Slide 37PTYS 554Evolution of Planetary SurfacesWeathering and Fate of SedimentsWeathering and Fate of SedimentsPYTS 554 – Weathering and Fate of Sediments2Production of sediments on terrestrial planetsSource rocksPhysical and chemical weatheringProduction of clays and oxidesTransport and deposition of sedimentsLandscape evolution and sedimentary basinsSize-sorting and Desert pavementStratigraphy of sediments – ripple laminae, cross-bedding etc…Burial and metamorphism of sedimentsDiagenesisKinds of metamorphismThe following 5 lecturesPYTS 554 – Weathering and Fate of Sediments3Most sediment comes from weathering initially solid rocks Ultimately, almost all terrestrial planet sediments were volcanically producedIntrusive volcanismSurface flowsAsh flows/falls1. Rocks need to be broken up2. Sediment needs to be transported and lithified3. Buried sediment can be metamorphosedPYTS 554 – Weathering and Fate of Sediments4Tephra/pyroclastic depositsBombs/blocks > 64mmCinders/Lapilli 2-64mmAsh < 2mmEscaping volatiles drive eruptions of different strengthsMeasured by % fragments < 1mm in sizeMeasured by area covered by tephraHigh-silica magmas drive the most explosive eruptionsSchmincke 2004PYTS 554 – Weathering and Fate of Sediments5Volcanic ash can be unconsolidated or easily remobilizedPYTS 554 – Weathering and Fate of Sediments6Crust of airless bodies suffers many impactsRepeated impacts create a layer of pulverized rockOld craters get filled in by ejecta blankets of new onesRegolith grows when crater breccia lenses coalesceAssume breccia (regolith) thickness of D/4Maximum thickness of regolith is Deq/4 , but not in all locationsSmaller craters are more numerous and have interlocking breccia lenses < Deq/4Shoemaker et al., 1969Growth of RegolithPYTS 554 – Weathering and Fate of Sediments7Minimum regolith thickness:Figure out the fractional area (fc) covered by craters D→Deq where (D < Deq)Choose some Dmin where you’re sure that every point on the surface has been hit at least once Typical to pick Dmin so that f(Dmin,Deq) = 2hmin of regolith ~ Dmin/4General caseProbability that the regolith has a depth h is: P(h) = f(4h→Deq) / fminMedian regolith depth <h> when: P(<h>) = 0.5Time dependence in heq or rather Deq α time1/(b-2) hmin=heq4 b- 2( )fminpbceq+1é ë ê ù û ú - 1b- 2( ) h =heq2heqhminæ è ç ö ø ÷ b- 2+1æ è ç ç ö ø ÷ ÷ é ë ê ê ù û ú ú - 1b- 2( )PYTS 554 – Weathering and Fate of Sediments8Impact brecciaUnsorted angular fragmentsPYTS 554 – Weathering and Fate of Sediments9All rocky airless bodies covered with regolith (‘rock blanket’)Moon - Helfenstein and Shepard 1999Itokawa – Miyamoto et al. 2007Eros – NEAR spacecraft (12m across)Miyamoto et al. 2007PYTS 554 – Weathering and Fate of Sediments10Thermal weatheringRocks expand and contract with changing temperatureThermal response timeStresses increase with steeper thermal gradientsRate of change of the surface temperature is a measurable proxy for rock thermal gradient t »pkd2where k =kr cDayNightSurfacecompressionSurfacetensionROCK ROCKPYTS 554 – Weathering and Fate of Sediments11Temperature gradients of 2 K/minute…Thermal fatigue at lower rates can accumulate over timeAided by heterogeneous nature of rocksMolaro and Byrne 2012Eros, Dombard et al. 2010PYTS 554 – Weathering and Fate of Sediments12Sediments have much lower conductivity than rocksConductivity variations Material differencesInduration (compaction, cementing agents etc…)Radiative heat transfer in regolithsRadiation across pore spaces is important in very hot regolithOnly really important for MercuryRatio of radiative to solid conduction varies widely ~0.1 for densely packed grains~1.5 for fluffy surface layerConductivity from gas in pore spacesNot a factor on the Moon/asteroids etc…Can assume a conductivity of solid material and calculate pore sizePore size ~~~~ grain size, so thermal inertia can be used to estimate grain sizeOnly works because pore size ~ mean free path of atmospheric moleculesi.e. only works on MarsPYTS 554 – Weathering and Fate of Sediments13Mike Mellon, U. ColoradoComposition varies little on MarsThermal inertia variations from induration and grain-size variationsThermal inertia on MarsLow – dust coveredHigh – rocky or IcyMost Geologic materials have value of (ρ.c)0.5 = 900-1400 (factor of ~1.5)Differences in thermal inertia mostly measure differences in thermal conductivity I = kr cPYTS 554 – Weathering and Fate of Sediments14Other physical weathering mechanismsFrost weatheringNot driven by the 9% volume increaseThin films of liquid water exist below the freezing point – surface energy effectWater migrates to form ice lens(generates all sorts of periglacial activity)Thermomolecular forces can generate kilobar pressuresPressure from the surrounding rock increases which lower the melting point and stops the processCan easily propagate cracksRempel 2007Taber 1930PYTS 554 – Weathering and Fate of Sediments15Other physical weathering mechanismsSalt weatheringBrine can fill rock poresEvaporation leaves salt crystalsHydration of crystals or thermal expansion forces rock cracks openGranular disintegration of graniteRocks are a heterogeneous messHydration of some minerals more effect than othersIn Granite, biotite becomes hydrated, expands and forces other crystals apartGruss = disintegrated graniteSand-sized debris is mostly quartz with less feldsparMost continental crust on Earth is granitic so most sand on the Earth is quartzPYTS 554 – Weathering and Fate of Sediments16Pre-existing cracks control weatheringJoints – often from tectonic unloadingSpallation/exfoliationCracks parallel to the free surfaceSurface-parallel compressive forces and surface curvature•Produces near-surface normal tensionMartel 2006PYTS 554 – Weathering and Fate of Sediments17Chemical
View Full Document