PowerPoint PresentationSlide 2Slide 3Slide 4Slide 5Slide 6Slide 7Slide 8Slide 9Slide 10Slide 11Slide 12Slide 13Slide 14Slide 15Slide 16Slide 17Slide 18Slide 19Slide 20Slide 21Slide 22Slide 23Slide 24Slide 25Slide 26Slide 27Slide 28Slide 29Slide 30Slide 31Slide 32Slide 33Slide 34Slide 35Slide 36PTYS 554Evolution of Planetary SurfacesImpact Cratering IImpact Cratering IPYTS 554 – Impact Cratering I2Impact Cratering ISize-morphology progressionPropagation of shocksHugoniotEjecta blankets - Maxwell Z-modelFloor rebound, wall collapseImpact Cratering IIThe population of impacting bodiesRescaling the lunar cratering rateCrater age datingSurface saturationEquilibrium crater populationsImpact Cratering IIIStrength vs. gravity regimeScaling of impactsEffects of material strengthImpact experiments in the labHow hydrocodes workPYTS 554 – Impact Cratering I3Where do we find craters? – Everywhere!Cratering is the one geologic process that every solid solar system body experiences…MercuryVenusMoonEarth Mars AsteroidsPYTS 554 – Impact Cratering I4Jupiter continues to perturb asteroidsMutual velocities remain highCollisions cause fragmentation not agglomerationFragments stray into Kirkwood gaps This material ends up in the inner solar systemPYTS 554 – Impact Cratering I5How much energy does an impact deliver?Projectile energy is all kinetic = ½mv2 ~ 2 ρ r3 v2Most sensitive to size of objectSize-frequency distribution is a power lawSlope close to -2Expected from fragmentation mechanicsMinimum impacting velocity is the escape velocityOrbital velocity of the impacting body itselfLowest impact velocity ~ escape velocity (~11 km s-1 for Earth)Highest velocity from a head-on collision with a body falling from infinityLong-period comet~78 km s-1 for the Earth~50 times the energy of the minimum velocity case1kg of TNT = 4.7 MJ – equivalent to 1kg of rock traveling at ~3 kms-1A 1km rocky body at 12 kms-1 would have an energy of ~ 1020J~20,000 Mega-Tons of TNTLargest bomb ever detonated ~50 Mega-Tons (USSR, 1961)2007 earthquake in Peru (7.9 on Richter scale) released ~10 Mega-Tons of TNT equivalentHarris et al. Vesc=GMpRp V = GM*2r-1aæ è ç ö ø ÷PYTS 554 – Impact Cratering I6Lunar craters – volcanoes or impacts?This argument was settled in favor of impacts largely by comparison to weapons testsMany geologists once believed that the lunar craters were extinct volcanoesPYTS 554 – Impact Cratering I7Overturned flap at edgeGives the crater a raised rimReverses stratigraphyEject blanketContinuous for ~1 RcBrecciaPulverized rock on crater floorShock metamorphosed mineralsStishoviteCoesiteTektitesSmall glassy blobs, widely distributedMelosh, 1989Meteor Crater – 1.2 kmPYTS 554 – Impact Cratering I8Craters are point-source explosionsWas fully realized in 1940s and 1950s test explosionsThree main implications:Crater depends on the impactor’s kinetic energy – NOT JUST SIZEImpactor is much smaller than the crater it producesMeteor crater impactor was ~50m in sizeOblique impacts still make circular cratersUnless they hit the surface at an extremely grazing angle (<5°)Meteor Crater – 1200mSedan Crater – 300mPYTS 554 – Impact Cratering I9Morphology changes as craters get biggerPit → Bowl Shape→ Central Peak → Central Peak Ring → Multi-ring BasinMoltke – 1km10 micronsEuler – 28kmSchrödinger – 320kmOrientale – 970kmPYTS 554 – Impact Cratering I10Simple vs. complexCharacteristics of cratersCharacteristics of cratersMoltke – 1kmEuler – 28kmMelosh, 1989PYTS 554 – Impact Cratering I11H =0.2DhR=0.2H =0.04DInterior bowl: parabolicRim+Ejecta falls off as distance cubedBreccia lens thickness ~0.5HShape is size independent e.g. H/DMelosh, 1989Complex craterPYTS 554 – Impact Cratering I12Central peaks of complex craters have upturned stratigraphyUpheaval dome, UtahUnnamed crater,Marshuplift=0.086D1.03Grieve and Pilkington (1996)PYTS 554 – Impact Cratering I13Simple to complex transition varies from planet to planet and material to materialMoltke – 1kmEuler – 28kmPYTS 554 – Impact Cratering I14Simple to complex transitionAll these craters start as a transient quasi-hemispheric cavitySimple cratersIn the strength regimeMost material pushed downwardsSize of crater limited by strength of rockEnergy ~ Complex cratersIn the gravity regimeSize of crater limited by gravityEnergy ~ At the transition diameter you can use either methodi.e. Energy ~ ~So: The transition diameter is higher whenThe material strength is higherThe density is lowerThe gravity is lowerY ~ 100 MPa and ρ ~ 3x103 kg m-3 for rocky planetsDT is ~3km for the Earth and ~18km for the MoonCompares well to observations 23p r3( )Y 23p r3( )r gD 23p rT3( )Y 23p rT3( )r g DT Y » r g DTor DT»Yr gPYTS 554 – Impact Cratering I15Shockwaves in solidsOnly Longitudinal waves important in crater formation~7 km s-1 in crustal rocksWhere K is the bulk modulus, μ is the shear modulusOnly one pulse, compression in one direction affects the othersCreates shear stress τ, pressure PSo:CL=K +43m( )r ¶2uL¶t2=CL2¶2uL¶x2sL=rouLCLsT=n1- næèçöø÷sLt =12sL- sT( )=121- 2n( )1- n( )sLP =13sL+sT+sT( )=131+n( )1- n( )sLt =321- 2n( )1+n( )P » 0.6PShockwaves in SolidsPYTS 554 – Impact Cratering I16Ductile failure wheni.e.Point of failure is the Hugoniot Elastic limitPermanent deformationAfter failing, the rock looses shear strengthShear Modulus declinesLongitudinal waves slow downInitial elastic wave now splits into an elastic and slower plastic wavesL- sT( )=Y sL>1- n( )1- 2n( )YPYTS 554 – Impact Cratering I17K is a function of pressureHigher pressure means higher K and faster wavesHigh enough stresses means wave speed can be even faster than the elastic caseWhen the longitudinal stress is very largeTypical impacts have 100s GPa peak pressuresWave speed exceeds elastic case and becomes a shock frontShocks are pretty narrow~mm in pure metals~10s m in rocks under impactsPYTS 554 – Impact Cratering I18Shocked minerals producedShock metamorphosed minerals produced from quartz-rich (SiO2) target
View Full Document