PowerPoint PresentationSlide 2Slide 3Slide 4Slide 5Slide 6Slide 7Slide 8Slide 9Slide 10Late Southern Fall (Ls = 86˚, 2 PM)Slide 12Slide 13Slide 14Slide 15Slide 16Slide 17Slide 18Slide 19Slide 20Slide 21Slide 22Slide 23Slide 24Slide 25Slide 26Slide 27Slide 28Slide 29PTYS 554Evolution of Planetary SurfacesAeolian Processes IIAeolian Processes IIPYTS 554 – Aeolian Processes II2Aeolian Processes IEntrainment of particles – settling timescalesThreshold friction speedsSuspension vs. saltation vs. reptation vs. creepDependences on gravity, densities of particle/airAeolian Processes IIMigration ratesDune typesDunefield pattern formationRipples vs. dunesVentifact, yardang erosionDust-devils and wind streaksPYTS 554 – Aeolian Processes II3Reminders from last lecture…Surface shear stress from the wind is often expressed as a shear velocity:Law of the wall predicts logarithmic wind velocity (u) changes with height (z):Where z0 is a surface roughness length scaleBalancing particle weight and wind shear stress we can calculate (with an empirical constant, A) the threshold shear stress or velocity:A2 more commonly called θ in fluvial studiesA also a function of fluid:particle density ratio ‘A’ is a function of Reynolds number so that very small particles (hiding in the laminar sub-layer) are harder to mobilize than larger particles.A preferred particle size exists that is sand-sized u*=tra uu*=1klnzzoæ è ç ö ø ÷ tT=A2rs- ra( )gdéëùû u*T=Ars- raraæ è ç ö ø ÷ gdPYTS 554 – Aeolian Processes II4One core expression for mass flux (q)There are many variations fit to empirical dataGreeley, 1985q»ragu*3PYTS 554 – Aeolian Processes II5Sand tends to stick in sandy areas and bounce quickly across rocky surfacesLow hills of sand feel asymmetric shear stressTurbulent shear stress at many wavelengths combined linearlyJackson and Hunt 1975Doesn’t work so well when slopes > 10-15°Shear stress drops to zero when slopes exceed ~ 25° (back-pressure effects)Pelletier 2009PYTS 554 – Aeolian Processes II6Formation of a dune…Asymmetric shear stress causes lee-slope of all low hills to steepen Lee slopes steepen past 25°Air flow separates from lee-slope surfaceSand falls onto the upper lee-slope and is not removed causing steepeningLee slope approaches angle of reposeSlope controlled by gain avalanchesDune advancesStossSlopeNegative mass balanceLeeSlopePositive mass balanceFlatNeutral mass balance qµ u*3µ t32PYTS 554 – Aeolian Processes II7Dune velocityMass sand flux: qSome fraction (f) of this comes from the dune itselfDune Velocity:Bigger dunes move slower for a given sand fluxDunefields with similar sized dunes are stableDune height is self-limiting due to streamline compressionhDxDt=2 f qrduneæèçöø÷h- 1PYTS 554 – Aeolian Processes II8Upwind: Stoss sideDownwind: Lee sideHighest point: crestSlipface start: BrinkDunesStossLeeHornHornPYTS 554 – Aeolian Processes II9Unidirectional windsDune shape depends on sand supplyBarchan Barchanoid ridges TransverseIncreasing sand supplyPYTS 554 – Aeolian Processes II10Barchan dunes provide valuable wind direction measurementsPYTS 554 – Aeolian Processes II11Late Southern Fall (Ls = 86˚, 2 PM)Late Southern spring (Ls = 286˚, 4 PM)Surface geology can be tied to atmospheric modelingIndicates the dunes formed under current wind directionsLate Southern spring (Ls = 286˚, 4 PM)Fenton et al.PYTS 554 – Aeolian Processes II12When wind directions varyLinear dunes – a little variationStar dunes – a lot of variationStar Linear/LongitudinalPYTS 554 – Aeolian Processes II13Longitudinal dunes on TitanLorenz et al., 2006PYTS 554 – Aeolian Processes II14Titan’s dunes cover a significant portion of the bodyWinds blow from west to east… opposite to what models predictRadibaugh & LorenzPYTS 554 – Aeolian Processes II15For fast dune (large disparity in dune size) collisions…A perturbation to a dune size leads to runaway growthDune interactions and dunefieldsPYTS 554 – Aeolian Processes II16CollisionsDunes have a separation bubble(zone of zero shear stress)Allows upwind dune to take sand from the downwind duneDune-size ratio close to 1Interaction is slowUpwind dune steals sand until size ratio is reversedDownwind dune is now faster and escapesDune-size ratio far from 1Interaction is fastDunes mergeDiniega et al. 2010PYTS 554 – Aeolian Processes II17Dune field pattern formationA stable dune field has dunes all roughly the same sizeConsider Incoming size ratio vs. Outgoing size ratio in collisionsOutgoing size ratio > IncomingDunes are closer to equal sizedNext collision will make the size ratios even closer to oneEquilibrium reached when all the dunes are the same size (also means no more collisions)Outgoing size ratio < IncomingDunes are more different in size after a collisionIf size ratio is too small then collisions get too fast and mergers start happeningOutgoing size ratio = IncomingSoliton-like behavior (misleading analogy) where dunes appear to pass through each otherDuran et al. 2005Herrmann et al. 2005PYTS 554 – Aeolian Processes II18Form perpendicular to wind directionMuch more dynamic than dunesAsymmetric, 8-10 vs 20-30 degree slopesSeparation bubbles, but not slip facesWavelengths 0.5cm to 25m (mega-ripples)Typical wavelengths 7-14cm, heights 0.5-1cmRipple index: L / Height, typically ~18Wavelength related to grain-size(but also wind speed…)RipplescmDL75.08.63Pelletier 2009PYTS 554 – Aeolian Processes II19Bagnold again…Saltation path length ~ wavelengthHigh angle impacts erode material from Stoss sideLow angle impacts deposit material in shadow zoneCoarse-grained material tends to get concentrated on the crestsPYTS 554 – Aeolian Processes II20YardangsWind blown particles abrades surfaceErosion leaves elongated mounds as remnantsRequires strong, virtually unidirectional, wind.Eroded material must be consolidatedVentifactsElongated erosional marks on rocksUsually works on originally circular vesiclesUsed as paleo-wind direction indicators e.g. pathfinder landing siteAeolian ErosionOlder wind actionRecentwind actionPYTS 554 – Aeolian Processes
View Full Document