DOC PREVIEW
MIT 18 02 - Gradient and conservative fields

This preview shows page 1 out of 2 pages.

Save
View full document
View full document
Premium Document
Do you want full access? Go Premium and unlock all 2 pages.
Access to all documents
Download any document
Ad free experience
Premium Document
Do you want full access? Go Premium and unlock all 2 pages.
Access to all documents
Download any document
Ad free experience

Unformatted text preview:

18.02A Topic 37: Gradient and conservative fields.Author: Jeremy OrloffRead: TB: 21.2 to p.762Review: F = hM, Ni,ZCF · dr =ZCM dx + N dy.Intrinsic formula:ZCF · dr =ZCF · T ds.Gradient fields: F = ∇f = hfx, fyi.Theorem (Fundamental Theorem for gradient fields):ZCF · dr = f(x, y)|P1P0= f(x1, y1) − f(x0, y0)where P0= (x0, y0) and P1= (x1, y1) are the endpointsof the curve C. That is, for gradient fields the line integralis independent of the path taken.xyCP0= (x0, y0)P1= (x1, y1)Example 1: Let f(x, y) = xy3+ x2⇒ F = ∇f = hy3+ 2x, 3xy2iLet C be the curve shown and compute I =ZCF · dr. Do this both directly (as inthe previous topic) and using the above formula.Method 1: parametrize C: x = x, y = 2x, 0 ≤ x ≤ 1.⇒ I =ZC(y3+ 2x) dx + 3xy2dy =Z10(8x3+ 2x) dx + 12x32 dx=Z1032x3+ 2x dx = 9.Method 2:ZC∇f · dr = f (1, 2) − f (0, 0) = 9.xyC(0, 0)(1, 2)Proof of the above theoremZC∇f · dr =ZCfxdx + fydy =Zt1t0fx(x(t), y(t))dxdt+ fy(x(t), y(t))dydtdt=Zt1t0ddtf(x(t), y(t)) dt = f (x(t), y(t))|t1t0= f(P1) − f(P0)Significance: F = ∇f ⇒ZCF · dr depends only on endpoints (is path inependent).F = ∇f ⇒ICF · dr = 0 (see below for proof)We say F = ∇f is conservative.Example 1: If F is the electric field of an electric charge it is conservative.Example 2: A gravitational field of a mass is conservative.118.02A topic 37 2Differentials: Here we use differentials to rephrase what we’ve done before. Firstrecall:a) ∇f = fxi + fyj ⇒ ∇f · dr = fxdx + fydy.b)ZC∇f · dr = f (P1) − f(p0).Using differentials we have df = fxdx + fydy. (This is the same as ∇f · dr.) Wesay M dx + N dy is an exact differential if M dx + N dy = df for some function f.As in (b) above we haveZCM dx + N dy =ZCdf = f(P1) − f(P0).Path independence: The line integralRCF · dr is called path independent if forany two points P and Q the integral yields the same value for every path between Pand Q.We show thatZCF · dr is path independent for any curve C is equivalent toICF · dr = 0 for any closed path.We have to show:i) Path independence ⇒ the line integral around any closed path is 0.ii) The line integral around all closed paths is 0 ⇒ path independence.i) Assume path independence and consider the closed path C shown in figure (i) below.Since the starting point P0is the same as the endpoint P1we getICF · dr = f(P1) − f(P0) = 0(this proves (i)).ii) AssumeICF · dr = 0 for any closed curve. ThenIC1−C2F · dr = 0 ⇒ZC1F · dr =ZC2F · dr⇒ path independence.xyCP0= P1Figure (i)xyC2C1P0P1Figure (ii)End of topic 37


View Full Document

MIT 18 02 - Gradient and conservative fields

Documents in this Course
Vectors

Vectors

1 pages

Exam 1

Exam 1

2 pages

Load more
Download Gradient and conservative fields
Our administrator received your request to download this document. We will send you the file to your email shortly.
Loading Unlocking...
Login

Join to view Gradient and conservative fields and access 3M+ class-specific study document.

or
We will never post anything without your permission.
Don't have an account?
Sign Up

Join to view Gradient and conservative fields 2 2 and access 3M+ class-specific study document.

or

By creating an account you agree to our Privacy Policy and Terms Of Use

Already a member?