Front Back
surface freedom
the ability to satisfy one's desires without interference (e.g., the ability to practice the religion of one's choice)
causal possibility
being able to happen or occur, given the particular circumstances and laws of nature.
determinism
the view that (given the antecedent conditions and laws of nature) there is only one causally possible future
ultimate responsibility
the origins of an action are "in me, not in something outside of me beyond my control.
True
Suppose that the world is deterministic. On Hobbe's account of "free," Sam waves her arm freely. T/F: According to the conditional anaylsis of "can", Sam could have not waved her arm instead.
False
Consider Tracy, who is perfectly motionless in a full body cast. T/F: According to the conditional analysis of "can," Tracy could have kicked her legs.
True
Consider Chris, who has an incredibly strong fear of snakes. Chris freely picks up a lizard next to a snake. T/F: According to the conditional analysis of "can," Chris could have picked up the snake instead.
True
T/F: One objection to the conditional analysis of "can" is that it is logically incoherent: being able to do otherwise requires an infinite series of choices.
A. Humans sometimes have free will.
Which claim must libertarians and soft determinists accept? A) humans sometimes have free will B) Incompatibilism is true C) Determinism is true
B. Incompatibilism is true
Which claim must hard incompatibilists and hard determinists both accept? A) humans sometimes have free will B) incompatibilism is true C) determinism is true
C) Determinism is true
Which claim must soft determinists and hard determinists both accept? A) humans sometimes have free will B) incompatibilism is true C) determinism is true
B) incompatibilism is true
Which claim must libertarians and hard determinists both accept? A) humans sometimes have free will. B) incompatibilism is true C) determinism is true
False
T/F: The conclusion of the consequence argument is equivalent to the claim that determinism is false.
False
T/F: According to the classical compatibilist( using the conditional analysis of "can"), if determinism is true, I cannot now change what I do right now.
True
According to the classical compatabilist (using the conditional analysis of "can"), I cannot now change the past.
True
According to Hobbes, having a power or ability right now doesn't require that one exercise it right now.
Libertarians
Who thinks incompatibilism is true? A) libertarians B) soft determinists C) both
Libertarians
Who thinks that free will requires Ultimate Responsibility? A) libertarians B) soft determinists C) both
soft determinists
Who thinks that alternate possibilities does not require open futures? A) libertarians B) soft determinists C) both
Libertarians
Who is the luck objection a problem for? A)libertarians B)soft determinists C)both
surface freedom
freedom to perform types of actions; freedom from interference in performing actions
free will
power or ability to make decisions and perform actions for which one may be held morally responsible
responsibility
that in virtue of which one is held accountable for her decision or action
Not UR
UR? movements of a puppet
Not UR
UR? remote control airplane
Not UR
UR? Hypnotized person, "brainwashed person.
UR
UR? decision and action of a person who deliberates independently of natural or social manipulation
UR
UR? decision and action that proceeds from a will, character, or motive for which the agent is ultimately responsible.
determinism
with the laws of nature and initial configuration of the universe, there is only one causally possible future
laws of nature
rules according to which natural change occurs
antecedent conditions
past states of the universe
causally possible
in these particular circumstances, it may occur
logically possible
regardless of particular circumstances, there is no contradiction in conceiving.
alternate possibilities
although i made this choice or decision, I could have done otherwise.
conflict between free will and determinism
If determinism is true, 1) there are no alternate possibilities and 2) no one has ultimate responsibility for what they decide to do
compatibilism
the view that free will and determinism don't conflict (it's possible that free will and human actions and choices are determined)
incompatibilism
the view that free will and determinism conflict. (it's not possible that humans have free will and humans actions and choices are determined)
causal regress of determinism
To get my action to be different, the cause of it (my choice) would have to be different and the cause of that would have to be different, and the cause of that would have to be different, and so on. *therefore if determinism is true, I cannot do otherwise
libertarianism
the view that 1) incompatibilism is true 2) humans sometimes have free will 3) determinism is false
hard compatibilism
1) incompatibilism is true 2)humans have no free will
hard determinist
the view that 1)incompatibilism is true 2)determinism is true 3) humans never have free will because determinism is true
soft determinist
the view that 1) compatibilism is true 2) humans sometimes have free will 3)determinism is true
indeterminism condition
the agent that is possible to act and act otherwise (chose different possible futures) given the same past circumstances and laws of nature
Luck Objection to Indeterminism
1) consider an agent who now faces a choice: tell truth or lie 2) if agency is indeterministic, then there is no causal connection between the choice and the agent who makes it (no connection to desires, motives, powers, or character. 3) Therefore the agent's choice (and the action that…
events
occur at particular times; and certain kinds of changes to the circumstances involved in an event transform it into a new event
agent
continue to exist through time
agent-causal libertarian
-free actions are agent-caused -event-caused actions are unfree
True
The example of the nervous assassin shows that although an action is undetermined, the action may still be voluntary
false
"because i wanted to get her attention" is an explanation in terms of causes of my waving at the waitress
true
according to the simple indeterminist, a free action cannot have a complete explanation of causes
true
the agent causalist and simple indeterminist agree that free action requires indeterminism
true
If there were something that prevented me from acting (being in a cast) Hobbes would say that I am not free to wave my arm
true
if there were no causal connection between the decision and the action ( that is, if the last arrow were erased and my arm still moved) Hobbes would say that the action is not free
true
if there a compulsion( compulsive hand waving) that produced the decision, Hobbes would say that the decision is not free
false
simply because every arrow depicts a deterministic causal connection , Hobbes would say that the action is not free

Access the best Study Guides, Lecture Notes and Practice Exams

Login

Join to view and access 3M+ class-specific study document.

or
We will never post anything without your permission.
Don't have an account?
Sign Up

Join to view 2 2 and access 3M+ class-specific study document.

or

By creating an account you agree to our Privacy Policy and Terms Of Use

Already a member?