TAMU CSCE 689 - libermanMattingly1985motorTheoryRevisitedSLIDES

Unformatted text preview:

The Motor Theory of Speech Perception RevisedAlvin M. Liberman and Ignatius G. MattinglyPresented ByNeal AudenaertAgenda Introductions Two Objections Experimental Evidence Some Issues DiscussionAgenda Introductions Two Objections Experimental Evidence Some Issues DiscussionIntendedGesturesThe Theory Objects of speech perception are intended phonetic gestures represented as invariant motor commandsAcousticSignalGestureRecognitionModuleCognitive ProcessesIntendedGesturesThe Theory Motor commands call for movements of the articulators  linguistically significant configurations Innately specifiedAcousticSignalGestureRecognitionModuleCognitive ProcessesAgenda Introductions Two Objections Meaningless Ludicrous Experimental Evidence Some Issues DiscussionMeaningless How does a “black box” help How to map from acoustics to gestures one-to-one many-to-oneCoarticulation Signal influenced by many gestures Influence is systematic Specific to language Isolated sounds are unintelligible Motor theory Speech perception differs from sound perception motor event vs. surface acoustic signalLudicrous Biological explanation Little green man hypothesis Not biologically unique Directionality of sound Visual depth perceptionProximal vs. Distal Perception Proximal Signal Directionality: time disparity Vision: binocular disparity Speech: acoustic signal Distal Perception Directionality: direction Vision: distance of object Speech: intended gestureSpeech is Different Different classes and domains Local of distal event Out there Conceptual (upstream neural command) Competition between modes  Auditory SpeechAgenda Introductions Two Objections Experimental Evidence Some Issues DiscussionExperimental Evidence Articulation: multiplicity, variety, equivilanceof cues Coarticulation Sound and percept Different sounds & contexts, same percept Same sound, different context, different perceptExperimental Evidence Distinct phonetic and auditory modes Convergent visual and auditory modes Characteristics required for perception Responses to cuesAgenda Introductions Two Objections Experimental Evidence Some Issues DiscussionSome Issues Aspects of the Theory Invariant gestures Perception-production link How direct is perception Motor theory and modularity One module or twoAgenda Introductions Two Objections Experimental Evidence Some Issues


View Full Document

TAMU CSCE 689 - libermanMattingly1985motorTheoryRevisitedSLIDES

Documents in this Course
slides

slides

10 pages

riccardo2

riccardo2

33 pages

ffd

ffd

33 pages

intro

intro

23 pages

slides

slides

19 pages

p888-ju

p888-ju

8 pages

w1

w1

23 pages

vfsd

vfsd

8 pages

subspace

subspace

48 pages

chapter2

chapter2

20 pages

MC

MC

41 pages

w3

w3

8 pages

Tandem

Tandem

11 pages

meanvalue

meanvalue

46 pages

w2

w2

10 pages

CS689-MD

CS689-MD

17 pages

VGL

VGL

8 pages

ssq

ssq

10 pages

Load more
Download libermanMattingly1985motorTheoryRevisitedSLIDES
Our administrator received your request to download this document. We will send you the file to your email shortly.
Loading Unlocking...
Login

Join to view libermanMattingly1985motorTheoryRevisitedSLIDES and access 3M+ class-specific study document.

or
We will never post anything without your permission.
Don't have an account?
Sign Up

Join to view libermanMattingly1985motorTheoryRevisitedSLIDES 2 2 and access 3M+ class-specific study document.

or

By creating an account you agree to our Privacy Policy and Terms Of Use

Already a member?