DOC PREVIEW
CU-Boulder JOUR 2403 - TV and AD Media Evolution and the 2000-2008 Revolution

This preview shows page 1 out of 4 pages.

Save
View full document
View full document
Premium Document
Do you want full access? Go Premium and unlock all 4 pages.
Access to all documents
Download any document
Ad free experience
Premium Document
Do you want full access? Go Premium and unlock all 4 pages.
Access to all documents
Download any document
Ad free experience

Unformatted text preview:

I. Terms: Holding companies, Regional agencies, Visual language, Post-modernism, Visual style, Oddvertising concept (time frame, examples, leader, end of Adoption curve), TV Industrial complex II. Agencies, People and work: Chiat/day, TBWA, Charles and Maurice Saatchi, Martin Sorrell, Wieden-Kennedy, Goodby, Silverstein and partners, Cliff Freeman, BMW filmsI. Terms/Concepts: Visual style (concept, time frame, examples),Oddvertising (concept, time, frame, examples, leader end of changes in media in 2000), Adoption curve (how is it changing), How communication is changing, What/how is digital changing, TV industrial complex, Fragmentation, Viral marketing, Media neutral ideas.II. Agencies, people and work: Goodby, berlin nd silverstein/cliff freeman, Crispin porter + Bogusky, RGA, Coke/Mentos CGC, Dove AD, BMW Films, Web 2.0, Consumer generated content, Nike+What happened at the turn of the century?Return to more classic approachesRe-birth of brandingInternet used as an advertising toolThen the ad world changed … againIn 2000 when these experiments of videotaping within homes for fun – to watch people’s lives2000-2008 MEDIA REVOLUTIONEmergence of new media vehiclesChange in consumer cultureChange in media structure within the ad industry  around 2000-2001 decided to pull all of their media departments out of the usual media structurewhere to put the ads? How to get to the people?How American media used to work:Consumer interested in content and advertisingLimited choices and no way to get rid of commercialsAwareness  built brandsAll products were launched to the majority:Geoff Moore  curveInnovators (2.5%)  early adopters (updated with new technology all the time) 13.5%  early and late majority (me) 35%  laggards (don’t have cell phones) 16%TV Industrial Complex: all American brands were organized in this order; how all the big branding companies and ad agencies saw the world and everythingCreate a product  buy TV ads  get more distribution  sell more products make more profitThis all changed in 2001The digital age was in its “infant stages”  internet explorer; everything else was slow and clunky with no internet at homeBMW FILMS  (2001-2002) (8 minute long videos) took all of their advertising dollars and instead of putting it into media, they hired the world’s best directors and created the idea of “the driver” and a series of films and stories highlighting this idea of driving BMWs (different types; highlight their car)This was so important because: this was the first time everyone figured out a branding moment on the internet  “wow you really can do some interesting things”; people started having internet access and you can have access to it at work too.It showed that you could spread info without traditional methods; and you didn’t need TV you can do your own methods of advertisingWe still loved TVThe average American spend more than 9 hours each day using mediaThe world changed again in 2004Web 2.0  it allowed everyday people (like us) to interact and create things on the web; you didn’t have to understand code to be able to createE.g. Facebook; blogging platformsThis shifted everything againIn 2004  Crispin Porter Bogusky stated “the future of advertising is…there isn’t any”One of the things that happened: YoutubePeople started creating their own content; had a public source for their creativityE.g. diet coke and mentos experimentsE.g. middle finger ads for Burger King2006 Dove soap decided to create a beauty campaign  VIRAL EXPANDSThese changes brought about the question: are BIG ads dead?Crispin Porter + Bogusky:Innovators of media neutral ideasPushed traditional clients to adopt untraditional waysOpened the doors to them making creative innovative thingsMedia Neutral ideas: e.g. mini cooper; Molson; Tobacco against smoking (8 second horn ad)all the fun things go on top of the carcreated tv ads  but they didn’t have much moneythey got the weekly world newsChickens and the king (asking the chicken whatever you can it to doFun traditional media ads  The Burger King mascot guyFacebook ad  choose 10 friends to delete and get a whopperBest buy (online twitter based hotline)2000-2010 Ad Age agency of the Decade:Bogusky then decided that he didn’t want to be in advertising anymore and left Crispin  to work on climate reality; put money in several agencies (promote and build American brands)R/GA  big agencyThey were named the digital agency of the decadeFacilitated a lot of the things that the agency was trying to createE.g. did the whole platform that linked NIKE to itunes and ipad  music running (Nike +)You could create some functionality and get that online and get online experiences and move back and forth from the twoIssues facing the industry in mid-2000’s to 2010Technology ruling the advertising businessConsume control of content and relationships  we are able to customize everything that we do with mediaAgencies struggle to keep up under increasing financial and business pressures  clients are demanding more and more work, and don’t necessarily have the money to pay for itFragmentationIt’s about quality not about volumeChart curve  the innovators (can expand message)It’s fragmented, but that might work towards our advantageIn the future media will be like sex  only losers will pay for themMedia  there is a future with itAdvertising  trying to understand with thatThe revolution will not be televised is will be streamedStreaming increasingly importantNetflix (house of cards; orange is the new black); project free tvMore competitive:The fight is over exclusiveEngagement:With all of these media and everything; how can you get people to pay attention to youThe conversation has shiftedOne way conversationBrand  emedia  consumerSpider web of conversation:Brand  ALL MESSAGES  consumer1980’s Michael Jackson ThrillerIt was the thing to have  took 12 months to happenWho Shot J.R. ErwingJOUR 2403 Lecture 5 Outline of Last Lecture I. Terms: Holding companies, Regional agencies, Visual language, Post-modernism, Visual style, Oddvertising concept (time frame, examples, leader, end of Adoption curve), TV Industrial complexII. Agencies, People and work: Chiat/day, TBWA, Charles and Maurice Saatchi, Martin Sorrell, Wieden-Kennedy, Goodby, Silverstein and partners, Cliff Freeman, BMW filmsOutline of Current Lecture I. Terms/Concepts: Visual


View Full Document

CU-Boulder JOUR 2403 - TV and AD Media Evolution and the 2000-2008 Revolution

Download TV and AD Media Evolution and the 2000-2008 Revolution
Our administrator received your request to download this document. We will send you the file to your email shortly.
Loading Unlocking...
Login

Join to view TV and AD Media Evolution and the 2000-2008 Revolution and access 3M+ class-specific study document.

or
We will never post anything without your permission.
Don't have an account?
Sign Up

Join to view TV and AD Media Evolution and the 2000-2008 Revolution 2 2 and access 3M+ class-specific study document.

or

By creating an account you agree to our Privacy Policy and Terms Of Use

Already a member?