DOC PREVIEW
TAMU POLS 207 - Constitutional Amendments and the Commerce Clause
Type Lecture Note
Pages 3

This preview shows page 1 out of 3 pages.

Save
View full document
Premium Document
Do you want full access? Go Premium and unlock all 3 pages.
Access to all documents
Download any document
Ad free experience

Unformatted text preview:

Lecture 7 POLS 207 Outline of Last Lecture Alternate Reasons for the 14th Amendment Part 3 I Narrow interpretation of why we have the 14th Amendment A Way for the judiciary to deal with race ethnicity a Plessy v Ferguson b Brown v Board of Education II Broader interpretation for why we have the 14th Amendment A Rights and liberties for everyone not just minorities a Gitlow v New York b Barron v Baltimore Outline of Current Lecture Constitutional Amendments and the Commerce Clause I The Seventeenth Amendment A Undercuts Federalist argument B Introduces disconnect between state governments and the people C Article 1 8 Congress shall have the power to II The Nineteenth Amendment A Political gender gap B Diversified electorate III The Power to Regulate Commerce Commerce Clause A Great Depression New Deal B United States v Lopez Current Lecture The Seventeenth Amendment In 1913 the 17th Amendment changed US Senators from being elected by state legislatures to being elected directly by the people This obviously changed the dynamics of the relationship between Senators and the state legislatures senators don t really suck up to legislatures now and are more accountable to the people which is arguably not ideal because it weakens the checks and balances system Originally the members of the House of Representatives were intended to represent the people and Senators were to be more representative of the state legislatures Now we have both houses of Congress being directly elected by the people and therefore both accountable directly to the people So the 17th amendment of 1913 changes whom US Senators represent It undercuts 1780s Federalists argument during ratification debate over US Constitution Recall that the Federalists were in favor of ratification and the Anti Federalists either had reservations or were downright against ratification The Federalists argued that checks and balances kept the Fed from becoming too powerful so when the 17th Amendment was adopted it partially undermined their argument It introduces a possible disconnect between the interests of a state s government and its people because its representatives are now directly elected meaning that the state governments interests aren t really represented in Congress anymore Anti Federalists were very upset by Article 1 Section 8 of the Constitution Congress shall have the power to They thought the central government was a threat to state power and they were right Supporters of the Constitution minimized the significance of the 1 8 powers Basically their argument was You don t have to worry about the exercise of these powers because it s going to be state officials executing these powers in Washington Congressmen and they re going to care about your interests since they maintain close connections with their constituents The Nineteenth Amendment The 19th Amendment of 1920 gave women the right to vote See chapter 4 123 for elaboration on the 19th Amendment See also Chapter 4 130 on the resulting political gender gap In politics the gender gap refers to differences between men and women in political views party affiliations and voting choices For example women are more likely than men to identity with the Democratic Party The differing views from men s that many women embraced the political gender gap diversified the electorate once they were allowed to vote There was a centralizing effect based on party ID vote and policy issues The Power to Regulate Commerce Great Depression New Deal greatly expanded Power to regulate commerce 1930s 1990s No one really challenged what this power to regulate commerce meant In 1995 with the Lopez case we see SCOTUS trying to enforce distinction between this commerce power and police power This was the first case in sixty years where the Supreme Court recognized a limit to Congress power to regulate commerce under Article 1 Section 8 This reaffirmed the notion that the Fed has only the powers enumerated in the Constitution Side note The enduring legacy of New Deal was that it convinced many that the national government had a responsibility to maintain regulate the economy public s expectation that national government is responsible for the health of the economy and more generally our wellbeing Postscripts on centralization since the 1960s LBJ and the Great Society of the sixties Continuation of the New Deal Reaffirmation of FDR s vision


View Full Document

TAMU POLS 207 - Constitutional Amendments and the Commerce Clause

Type: Lecture Note
Pages: 3
Download Constitutional Amendments and the Commerce Clause
Our administrator received your request to download this document. We will send you the file to your email shortly.
Loading Unlocking...
Login

Join to view Constitutional Amendments and the Commerce Clause and access 3M+ class-specific study document.

or
We will never post anything without your permission.
Don't have an account?
Sign Up

Join to view Constitutional Amendments and the Commerce Clause and access 3M+ class-specific study document.

or

By creating an account you agree to our Privacy Policy and Terms Of Use

Already a member?