Unformatted text preview:

1 Galileo s Defense May 10 1633 When asked if I had signified to the Reverend Father the Master of the Holy Palace the injunction privately laid upon me about sixteen years ago by the order of the Holy Office not to hold defend or in any way teach the doctrine of the motion of the Earth and the stability of the Sun I answered that I had not done so And not being questioned as to the reason why I had not intimated it I had no opportunity to add anything further It now appears to me necessary to state the reason in order to demonstrate the purity of my intention ever foreign to the practice of simulation or deceit in any operation I engage in I say then that as at that time reports were spread abroad by evil disposed persons to the effect that I had been summoned by the Lord Cardinal Bellarmine to abjure certain of my opinions and teachings and also to submit to penitence for them I was thus constrained to apply to his Eminence and to solicit him to furnish me with an attestation explaining the cause for which I had been summoned before him which attestation I obtained in his own handwriting and it is the same that I now produce with the present document From this it clearly appears that it was merely announced to me that the doctrine attributed to Copernicus of the motion of the Earth and the stability of the Sun must not be held or defended but that beyond this general announcement affecting everyone there should have been ordered anything to me in particular no trace thereof appears in it Having then as a reminder this authentic attestation in the handwriting of the very person who informed me of the command I made no further application of thought or memory with regard to the words employed in orally announcing to me the said order not to hold or defend the doctrine in question so that the two articles of the order in addition to the injunction not to hold or defend it to wit the words not to teach it and in any way whatsoever which I hear are contained in the order enjoined on me and registered struck me as quite novel and as if I had not heard them before and I do not think I ought to be disbelieved when I urge that in the course of fourteen or sixteen years I had lost all recollection of them especially as I had no need to give any particular thought to them having in my possession so authentic a reminder in writing Now if the said two articles accompanying attestation there is no doubt that the injunction contained in the latter is the same command as that contained in the decree of the Holy Congregation of the Index Hence it appears to me that I have a reasonable excuse for not having notified to the Master of the Holy Palace about the command privately imposed upon me it being the same as that of the Congregation of the Index Now if so be my book was not subject to a stricter censorship than that made binding by the decree of the Index it will it appears to me be sufficiently plain that I adopted the surest and most becoming method of having it guaranteed and purged of all shadow of taint inasmuch as I handed it to the Supreme Inquisitor at the very time when many books dealing with the same matters were being prohibited solely by virtue of the said decree After what I have now stated I 2 would confidently hope that the idea of my having knowingly and deliberately violated the command imposed upon me will henceforth be entirely banished from the minds of my most eminent and wise judges hence those faults which are seen scattered throughout my book have not been artfully introduced with any concealed or other than sincere intention but have only inadvertently fallen from my pen owing to a vainglorious ambition and complacency in desiring to appear more subtle than the generality of popular writers as indeed in another deposition I have confessed which fault I shall be ready to correct with all possible industry whenever I may be commanded or permitted by Their Most Eminent Lordships Lastly it remains for me to beg you to take into consideration my pitiable state of bodily indisposition to which at the age of seventy years I have been reduced by ten months of constant mental anxiety and the fatigue of a long and toilsome journey at the most inclement season together with the loss of a greater part of the years to which from my previous condition of health I had the prospect I am persuaded and encouraged to do so by the faith I have in the clemency and goodness of the most Eminent Lords my judges with the hope that they may be pleased in answer to my prayer to remit what may appear in their entire justice the rightful addition that is still lacking to such sufferings to make up an adequate punishment for my crimes out of consideration for my declining age which too humbly commends itself to them And I would equally commend to their consideration my honor and reputation against the calumnies of ill wishers whose persistence in detracting from my good name may be inferred from the necessity which constrained me to procure from the Lord Cardinal Bellarmine the attestation which accompanies this Source Giorgio de Santillana The Crime of Galileo Affair Chicago University of Chicago Press 1955 258 60


View Full Document

SC HIST 101 - Galileo's defense 1633

Documents in this Course
History

History

4 pages

Salic law

Salic law

20 pages

Notker

Notker

2 pages

Jocelyn

Jocelyn

12 pages

Alexiad

Alexiad

8 pages

c7

c7

2 pages

Load more
Loading Unlocking...
Login

Join to view Galileo's defense 1633 and access 3M+ class-specific study document.

or
We will never post anything without your permission.
Don't have an account?
Sign Up

Join to view Galileo's defense 1633 and access 3M+ class-specific study document.

or

By creating an account you agree to our Privacy Policy and Terms Of Use

Already a member?