DOC PREVIEW
UF STA 6166 - Exam 3 – Spring 2016

This preview shows page 1 out of 4 pages.

Save
View full document
View full document
Premium Document
Do you want full access? Go Premium and unlock all 4 pages.
Access to all documents
Download any document
Ad free experience
Premium Document
Do you want full access? Go Premium and unlock all 4 pages.
Access to all documents
Download any document
Ad free experience

Unformatted text preview:

STA 6166 – Exam 3 – Spring 2016 PRINT Name _________________________Conduct all Tests at  = 0.05 significance level.Q.1. A researcher is interested in determining whether people’s attitudes toward a political candidate is effected byexposure to an advertisement for the candidate. Subjects were asked if they had a positive attitude toward the candidateprior to seeing the video (Yes or No). The subjects then watched an hour-long television show, with advertisement beingplayed during the TV show. Afterwards, the subjects were again asked whether they had a positive attitude toward thecandidate (Yes or No). Which method of analysis would be appropriate? Pearson’s Chi-Square Test Fisher’s Exact Test McNemar’s Test Test for Ordinal AssociationQ.2. A study was conducted with large samples of British, Belgian, and Norwegian food consumers being classified intoone of 5 classifications (naïve, sensible, skeptical, denying, or other). If we wished to test whether there was anassociation between classification and nationality, we would reject the null hypothesis of no association, if the test statisticfalls in the range: > 3.841 > 5.991 > 7.815 > 9.488 > 11.070 > 15.507 Need to know sample sizesQ.3. A Randomized Block Design (when it is feasible to be conducted) is generally preferred to a CompletelyRandomized Design because it typically increases the experimental error variance for a given sample size. TRUE / FALSEQ.4. If in a sample of individuals, classified on 2 ordinal scales, 75% of all combined Concordant and Discordant pairs areconcordant, then the estimate of Gamma will be: 0.75 -0.75 0.50 -0.50 0.25 -0.25 0 None of the aboveQ.5. A study was conducted, with samples of 2 brands of cars, and whether or not the car could reach a given speed in agiven amount of time (Pass or Fail). The researchers sampled 10 cars from each brand, and found that 3 of Brand A didpass the test, and 1 from Brand B did. Fill in the contingency table for this outcome, and the table for the more extremeoutcome in favor of Brand A, given the marginal totals.Q.6. In a test of the endowment effect, the following experiment was conducted with data given below.- 3 Gift Conditions (Explanatory Variable): Subject given a mug (1), given candy bar (2), given nothing (3)- 2 Possible Outcomes: Preference between Mug (1) or Candy (2)We wish to test H0: No association between Gift Condition and Product preference p.6.a. Complete the table of Expected Counts under the null hypothesis.p.6.b. Give the rejection region for the chi-square test: Reject H0 if the test statistic _______________________p.6.c. Compute the contribution to the chi-square statistic for the upper left cell of the table (Given Mug / Prefer Mug)p.6.d. Based on p.6.b. and p.6.c., the P-value for the fully computed chi-square statistic is > 0.05 or < 0.05p.6.e. Let NM be the population proportion who had been given nothing who prefer the mug to the candy bar. Compute a95% Confidence Interval for NM Note: Use only information from observed values of Condition 3Q.7. An ergonomic study was conducted to compare comfort ratings among 3 chair models (treatments). The studyinvolved 12 subjects (blocks) who each rated each chair (in random order) in a Randomized Block Design (RBD).p.7.a. Complete the Analysis of Variance table.p.7.b. Compute the Relative Efficiency of the RBD versus a Completely Randomized Design (CRD). How many subjectsper treatment would be needed to have equivalent standard errors of chair type means?Relative Efficiency ___________________________ # of Subjects per treatment in CRD __________________p.7.c. Compute Tukey’s Honest Significant difference (W) for comparing treatment means.Wij = ______________________________Q.8. A study considered the effect of juvenile criminal offenders being tried as adults. A sample of 2097 youths tried asadults were matched pairwise with 2097 youths tried as juveniles, with matching based on prior criminal behavior. Theresponse was whether or not the youth was re-arrested during a subsequent follow-up period. The data are given belowwhere the counts are the number of the 2097 pairs that fall in that cell of the table. Let J be the true probability of a youthtried as a Juvenile to be re-arrested, and A be similarly defined for a youth tried as an Adult. Use McNemar’s test to test:0: :J A A J AH Hp p p p= �p.8.a. Compute the test statistic and rejection region for this test.Test Statistic: ___________________________ Rejection Region: ___________________________p.8.b. Which statement best describes the conclusion? Tried as Adult has higher probability Tried as Juvenile has higher Probability No DifferenceQ.9. A study was conducted to compare adverse events between two dose levels of Escitalopram (10 mg, and 20 mg). Among n10 = 535 subjects receiving the 10 mg dose, y10 = 105 reported symptoms of nausea. Among n20 = 542 subjects receiving the 20 mg dose, y20 = 125 reported symptoms of nausea. These are independent samples.p.9.a. Complete the following contingency table:p.11.b. Compute the following quantities:^ ^10 20__________________________ ____________________ ___________________p p p= = =p.9.c. Given the following quantities ( )10 201 11 .0250n np p� �- + =� �� �p.9.c.i) Test H0: versus HA:≠ Test Statistic: ______________________ Rejection Region _________________ P-value < .05 or >


View Full Document

UF STA 6166 - Exam 3 – Spring 2016

Documents in this Course
Exam 1

Exam 1

4 pages

Exam 1

Exam 1

4 pages

Exam 1

Exam 1

4 pages

VARIABLES

VARIABLES

23 pages

Exam #2

Exam #2

4 pages

Exam2

Exam2

6 pages

Sampling

Sampling

21 pages

Exam 1

Exam 1

4 pages

Exam 1

Exam 1

5 pages

Load more
Download Exam 3 – Spring 2016
Our administrator received your request to download this document. We will send you the file to your email shortly.
Loading Unlocking...
Login

Join to view Exam 3 – Spring 2016 and access 3M+ class-specific study document.

or
We will never post anything without your permission.
Don't have an account?
Sign Up

Join to view Exam 3 – Spring 2016 2 2 and access 3M+ class-specific study document.

or

By creating an account you agree to our Privacy Policy and Terms Of Use

Already a member?