DOC PREVIEW
UF STA 6166 - Potato Cooking Quality Data

This preview shows page 1 out of 2 pages.

Save
View full document
View full document
Premium Document
Do you want full access? Go Premium and unlock all 2 pages.
Access to all documents
Download any document
Ad free experience
Premium Document
Do you want full access? Go Premium and unlock all 2 pages.
Access to all documents
Download any document
Ad free experience

Unformatted text preview:

Part 1: Summarizing DataPart 2: ProbabilitySTA 6166 – Fall 2008Project 1 Potato Cooking Quality DataPart 1: Summarizing DataThe dataset potato.dat has quality assessment scores for 160 combinations of 5 factors. Assessments are made on 3 aspects: Texture, Flavor, and Moistness. This project involves fully describing these variables via numericsummaries and graphics. Note that each observation is actually the mean of 20 scores (5 judges x 4 replications), but that should not affect your analysis.The data are arranged as given in the following table:Variable Cols LevelsGrowing Area 8 1=Southern OR, 2=Central ORHolding Temperature 16 1=75F, 2=40FSize of Potato 24 1=Large, 2=MediumStorage Period 32 1=0months, 2=2m, 3=4m, 4=6mCooking Method 40 1=Boil,2=Steam,3=Mash,4=Bake@350F,5=Bake@450Texture Score 46-48Flavor Score 54-56Moistness Score 62-64Complete the parts listed below for the portion of the project.- Obtain a numeric summary for each aspect: texture, flavor, and moistness(mean, standard deviation).- Obtain the mean and standard deviation for flavor score, separately by:- Growing Area- Holding Temperature- Storage Period- Cooking Method- Construct a histogram of Texture scores - Obtain mean and standard deviations for flavor scores for all combinations of size of potato and storage period. Plot the mean scores by storage period, separately by size of potato. (See figure 2.2, p.31 as a prototype).- Construct a scatterplot of flavor (vertical) versus texture (horizontal)- Type up a brief, but thorough description of your findingsPart 2: ProbabilityObtain the following probabilities for this portion of the project:- Probability a texture score is greater than or equal to 3.0- Probability a moistness score is greater than the flavor score- Probability a moistness score is greater than 3.0 given Southern OR- Probability a moistness score is greater than 3.0 given Central OR- Probability a moistness score below 2.5- Probability a potato was baked, given moistness score below 2.5- Probability a potato was not baked, given moistness score below 2.5Source: Mackey, A. and J. Stockman (1958). “Cooking Quality of Oregon-Grown Russet Potatoes,” American Potato Journal, Vol.35,


View Full Document

UF STA 6166 - Potato Cooking Quality Data

Documents in this Course
Exam 1

Exam 1

4 pages

Exam 1

Exam 1

4 pages

Exam 1

Exam 1

4 pages

VARIABLES

VARIABLES

23 pages

Exam #2

Exam #2

4 pages

Exam2

Exam2

6 pages

Sampling

Sampling

21 pages

Exam 1

Exam 1

4 pages

Exam 1

Exam 1

5 pages

Load more
Download Potato Cooking Quality Data
Our administrator received your request to download this document. We will send you the file to your email shortly.
Loading Unlocking...
Login

Join to view Potato Cooking Quality Data and access 3M+ class-specific study document.

or
We will never post anything without your permission.
Don't have an account?
Sign Up

Join to view Potato Cooking Quality Data 2 2 and access 3M+ class-specific study document.

or

By creating an account you agree to our Privacy Policy and Terms Of Use

Already a member?