DOC PREVIEW
UF STA 6166 - Bimodal Non-symmetric Distributions to Compare Mean and Median

This preview shows page 1-2-3 out of 10 pages.

Save
View full document
View full document
Premium Document
Do you want full access? Go Premium and unlock all 10 pages.
Access to all documents
Download any document
Ad free experience
View full document
Premium Document
Do you want full access? Go Premium and unlock all 10 pages.
Access to all documents
Download any document
Ad free experience
View full document
Premium Document
Do you want full access? Go Premium and unlock all 10 pages.
Access to all documents
Download any document
Ad free experience
Premium Document
Do you want full access? Go Premium and unlock all 10 pages.
Access to all documents
Download any document
Ad free experience

Unformatted text preview:

I randomly generated 10 datasets (samples, labeled X1 to X10) from the same population distribution of X, a random variable that is bimodal and non-symmetric. The distribution is similar to the one I showed at the end of class on August 30th. The question was whether the mean would be smaller, equal to, or larger than the median. I thought probably smaller but wasn’t completely sure. A student after class gave a good argument for why the median would be larger. So that you can see that the mean is smaller than the median for this kind of frequency distribution, I attach the results of the ten randomly generated datasets. This is not a rigorous proof but is an empirical demonstration of the event. Enjoy. X1 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 Quantiles 100.0% maximum 13.23799.5% 13.23397.5% 11.93290.0% 11.04775.0% quartile 10.44950.0% median 9.53525.0% quartile 6.85910.0% 4.8262.5% 3.5240.5% 2.8410.0% minimum 2.839Moments Mean 8.713912Std Dev 2.3863579Std Err Mean 0.168741upper 95% Mean 9.0466619lower 95% Mean 8.3811621N 200X2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 Quantiles 100.0% maximum 12.54599.5% 12.54497.5% 12.03290.0% 11.17575.0% quartile 10.33650.0% median 9.47025.0% quartile 7.22510.0% 5.0142.5% 4.0120.5% 3.5940.0% minimum 3.593Moments Mean 8.7874722Std Dev 2.2784653Std Err Mean 0.1611118upper 95% Mean 9.1051777lower 95% Mean 8.4697667N 200X3 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 Quantiles 100.0% maximum 12.11099.5% 12.11097.5% 11.89390.0% 11.07975.0% quartile 10.41550.0% median 9.49125.0% quartile 7.57510.0% 4.2232.5% 3.2730.5% 1.6010.0% minimum 1.601Moments Mean 8.6131393Std Dev 2.5671079Std Err Mean 0.1815219upper 95% Mean 8.9710927lower 95% Mean 8.2551859N 200X4 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 Quantiles 100.0% maximum 12.52299.5% 12.52297.5% 12.02790.0% 11.21375.0% quartile 10.28950.0% median 9.37725.0% quartile 7.20810.0% 4.5102.5% 3.8350.5% 2.9750.0% minimum 2.975Moments Mean 8.6864321Std Dev 2.3780018Std Err Mean 0.1681501upper 95% Mean 9.0180168lower 95% Mean 8.3548473N 200X5 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 Quantiles 100.0% maximum 12.73599.5% 12.73497.5% 12.14890.0% 11.01975.0% quartile 10.48350.0% median 9.64525.0% quartile 7.26110.0% 4.8942.5% 3.4220.5% 2.7930.0% minimum 2.792Moments Mean 8.7905661Std Dev 2.3719027Std Err Mean 0.1677188upper 95% Mean 9.1213004lower 95% Mean 8.4598318N 200X6 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 Quantiles 100.0% maximum 12.25699.5% 12.25697.5% 11.92390.0% 11.06875.0% quartile 10.44550.0% median 9.54225.0% quartile 7.49410.0% 4.9042.5% 3.7800.5% 2.7820.0% minimum 2.781Moments Mean 8.812851Std Dev 2.3112338Std Err Mean 0.1634289upper 95% Mean 9.1351257lower 95% Mean 8.4905763N 200X7 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 Quantiles 100.0% maximum 12.66799.5% 12.66797.5% 12.04490.0% 11.35675.0% quartile 10.64250.0% median 9.44625.0% quartile 7.42510.0% 4.7112.5% 3.8510.5% 2.8740.0% minimum 2.874Moments Mean 8.829134Std Dev 2.4210206Std Err Mean 0.171192upper 95% Mean 9.1667172lower 95% Mean 8.4915508N 200X8 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 Quantiles 100.0% maximum 12.16199.5% 12.16197.5% 11.90190.0% 11.12475.0% quartile 10.63250.0% median 9.67625.0% quartile 7.29610.0% 4.9782.5% 3.8790.5% 3.2270.0% minimum 3.226Moments Mean 8.864749Std Dev 2.3302453Std Err Mean 0.1647732upper 95% Mean 9.1896746lower 95% Mean 8.5398233N 200X9 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 Quantiles 100.0% maximum 12.77299.5% 12.76997.5% 12.00390.0% 11.38575.0% quartile 10.49350.0% median 9.52525.0% quartile 7.22510.0% 4.6582.5% 2.8260.5% 2.0250.0% minimum 2.023Moments Mean 8.7636786Std Dev 2.4962669Std Err Mean 0.1765127upper 95% Mean 9.111754lower 95% Mean 8.4156032N 200X10 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 Quantiles 100.0% maximum 13.30299.5% 13.29897.5% 12.40490.0% 11.29475.0% quartile 10.40150.0% median 9.50725.0% quartile 7.12310.0% 4.9162.5% 3.8580.5% 3.2580.0% minimum 3.258Moments Mean 8.8010752Std Dev 2.3764157Std Err Mean 0.168038upper 95% Mean 9.1324387lower 95% Mean 8.4697116N


View Full Document

UF STA 6166 - Bimodal Non-symmetric Distributions to Compare Mean and Median

Documents in this Course
Exam 1

Exam 1

4 pages

Exam 1

Exam 1

4 pages

Exam 1

Exam 1

4 pages

VARIABLES

VARIABLES

23 pages

Exam #2

Exam #2

4 pages

Exam2

Exam2

6 pages

Sampling

Sampling

21 pages

Exam 1

Exam 1

4 pages

Exam 1

Exam 1

5 pages

Load more
Download Bimodal Non-symmetric Distributions to Compare Mean and Median
Our administrator received your request to download this document. We will send you the file to your email shortly.
Loading Unlocking...
Login

Join to view Bimodal Non-symmetric Distributions to Compare Mean and Median and access 3M+ class-specific study document.

or
We will never post anything without your permission.
Don't have an account?
Sign Up

Join to view Bimodal Non-symmetric Distributions to Compare Mean and Median 2 2 and access 3M+ class-specific study document.

or

By creating an account you agree to our Privacy Policy and Terms Of Use

Already a member?