DOC PREVIEW
DREXEL PHIL 105 - Drexel 105, Week 5, Class 1

This preview shows page 1-2-19-20 out of 20 pages.

Save
View full document
View full document
Premium Document
Do you want full access? Go Premium and unlock all 20 pages.
Access to all documents
Download any document
Ad free experience
View full document
Premium Document
Do you want full access? Go Premium and unlock all 20 pages.
Access to all documents
Download any document
Ad free experience
View full document
Premium Document
Do you want full access? Go Premium and unlock all 20 pages.
Access to all documents
Download any document
Ad free experience
View full document
Premium Document
Do you want full access? Go Premium and unlock all 20 pages.
Access to all documents
Download any document
Ad free experience
Premium Document
Do you want full access? Go Premium and unlock all 20 pages.
Access to all documents
Download any document
Ad free experience

Unformatted text preview:

Slide 1Midterm in One Week!Chapter 1: Introduction to Critical ThinkingChapter 2: Recognizing ArgumentsChapter 3: Basic Logical ConceptsChapter 3 continued. . .Chapter 3 continued…Chapter 4: LanguageSlide 9Chapter 4: LanguageWord Choice Matters!On Paper WritingImprecise Language: VaguenessImprecise Language: OvergeneralityImprecise Language: AmbiguitySlide 16One more…Ambiguities, continued…Ambiguities, continued…For Next Time…Critical ReasoningWeek 5: Class 1Midterm in One Week!The Midterm is due by 5pm Monday. I’ll post the answers to Quiz 2 as soon as everyone’s completed it!I’ll have more information on the Midterm on Wednesday! For now, here’s a quick review of what we’ve covered so farChapter 1: Introduction to Critical ThinkingCritical Thinking StandardsBarriers to Critical ThinkingCharacteristics of Critical ThinkersChapter 2: Recognizing ArgumentsArgument: A claim (conclusion) defended with reasons (premises). Identifying Premises and ConclusionWhat is Not an ArgumentChapter 3: Basic Logical Concepts “In evaluating any argument, one should always ask two key questions: (1) Are the premises true? and (2) Do the premises provide good reasons to accept the conclusion?” (Bassham 53)DeductionInductionChapter 3 continued. . .How to Tell whether an Argument is Deductive or InductiveDeductive arguments try to prove that their conclusions are true given the premises. Inductive arguments try to show that their conclusions are likely given the premises.Chapter 3 continued…Common Patterns of Deductive Reasoning. Common Patterns of Inductive ReasoningChapter 4: LanguageMany philosophers mark language as what sets us apart from the animals.“If a lion could speak, we could not understand him.”(Ludwig Wittgenstein, Philosophical Investigations, p.223)Chapter 4: Language“In this chapter we focus on the skills of choosing the right word, defining words, and identifying the emotive and slanted messages some words carry” (Bassham 86)Word Choice Matters!Where is this from?On Paper WritingBassham is pretty harsh on students! He asks, whose fault is it that your professor didn’t “get” your paper? His answer: yours!It is not up to your professor (or boss, or client, etc.) to “get” you. It is very important to be as clear as possible! Practice this in your HW for this week—DON’T LEAVE IT TO ME TO GUESS WHETHER YOU UNDERSTAND THE TEXT!Imprecise Language: Vagueness“A word (or group of words) is vague when its meaning is fuzzy and inexact.”Again, words are vague if they have fuzzy or inexact boundaries and hence give rise to unclear borderline cases. The mother of the young mountain climber wants him to give it up.Give what up? Mountain climbing? Heroin? Who is “him”?American Dad is inappropriate.What does “inappropriate” signify?Imprecise Language: OvergeneralityWords are overgeneral if the information they provide is too broad and unspecific in a given context.When are you going to study for the midterm? –Later. When’s later? –after the party…This is overgeneral because it is actually an answer, just not at all meaningful or helpful!Imprecise Language: AmbiguityAmbiguity refers to a doubtful sense of a word or phrase. Many words have more than one meaning.A word or expression is ambiguous if it has two or more distinct meanings and the context does not make clear which meaning is intended. Ambiguity is what makes puns and many jokes funny, but used unintentionally it can destroy the effectiveness of an argument.An ambiguous word is imprecise because it is unclear which of two or more distinct meanings (each of which may be quite precise) is the one intended by the author.One more…Ambiguities, continued…Ambiguities that result from uncertainty about the meaning of an individual word or phrase are called semantic ambiguities.Ambiguities that result from faulty grammar or word order are called syntactical ambiguities.Ambiguities, continued…What is a verbal dispute?A dispute that occurs when people appear to disagree on an issue but in actuality have simply not resolved the ambiguity of a key term. What is a factual dispute?A dispute that occurs when opponents disagree not over the meanings of words but over the relevant facts.For Next Time…HW 4 due Wednesday. Don’t forget that you are supposed to take 2 different examples from 2 different kinds of media and analyze the arguments that are given using what we’ve learned in class!!!Read Bassham 93-117BONUS: Email Patricia 3 examples each of a vague, overgeneral, and ambiguous statement or argument by 8:00am Wednesday


View Full Document

DREXEL PHIL 105 - Drexel 105, Week 5, Class 1

Download Drexel 105, Week 5, Class 1
Our administrator received your request to download this document. We will send you the file to your email shortly.
Loading Unlocking...
Login

Join to view Drexel 105, Week 5, Class 1 and access 3M+ class-specific study document.

or
We will never post anything without your permission.
Don't have an account?
Sign Up

Join to view Drexel 105, Week 5, Class 1 2 2 and access 3M+ class-specific study document.

or

By creating an account you agree to our Privacy Policy and Terms Of Use

Already a member?