Pitt EOH 2504 - The Relationship between Environmental Monitoring

Unformatted text preview:

TheRelationshipbetweenEnvironmentalMonitoringandBiologicalMarkersinExposureAssessmentS.M.Rappaport,'E.Symanski,1J.W.Yager,23andL.L.Kupper''SchoolofPublicHealth,UniversityofNorthCarolina,ChapelHill,NorthCarolina;2SchoolofPublicHealth,UniversityofCalifornia,Berkeley,CaliforniaThepoorqualityoftraditionalassessmentsofexposurehasencouragedepidemiologiststoexplorebiologicalmonitoringinstudiesofchronicdis-eases.Yet,despitetheoreticaladvantages,biomarkershavenotbeenwidelyusedinsuchapplications.Thisarticlecomparesthegeneralutilityofabiomarkerwiththatofthemeasurementofexposureperse.Pointsareillustratedwithalongitudinalstudyofboatworkersinwhichlevelsofstyreneinthebreathingzoneandinexhaledairwerecomparedtosisterchromatidexchanges(SCEs)inperipherallymphocytes.First,thelinearrelationshipisexploredbetweenpersonalexposureandthelevelsofabiomarkerinthecohort.Agoodfittothestraight-linerelationshipreflectedbyacorrelationcoefficientwhichiscloseto1,suchasobservedwithstyreneinexhaledair(r2=0.83),suggestslinearkinetics,thattheappropriaterouteofexposurewasmeasuredbypersonalmonitoring,smallinterindividualdifferences,adequatesamplesizes,andaspecificbiomarker.2However,asmallcorrelationcoefficient,asobservedbetweenSCEsandstyreneexposure(r=0.1),indicatesthateitherkineticswerenonlinearorthatmorecomplexissueswereinvolvedwithoneormoreofthesefactors.Second,environmentalandbiologicmeasurementsarecomparedforuseasindependentvariablesinestablishingastraight-linerelationshipbetweenexposureandthehealtheffect.Iftheratioofthewithin-persontothebetween-personcomponentsofvarianceoftheindependentvariableislarge,thensignificantattenuationresultswhenestimatingtheslopeoftheline.Sincesuchattenuationcanbereducedbymakingrepeatedmeasurementsoneachpersoninthecohort,thesamplesizesrequiredtoreducethebiasto afixedlevelcanbeusedtocomparethevariousmeasuresofexposure.Usingdatafromthestyrene-exposedworkers,itisshownthattheslopebeingestimatedwouldbewithin10%ofthecorrectslopeparameterwith3personalmeasurementsofexposurecomparedto4samplesofexhaledair(12measurements)and20assaysofSCEs.Thus,inthiscase,themeasurementofairborneexposurewouldbemoreefficientthanthatofeitherexhaledairorSCEsforepidemiologicpurposes.-EnvironHealthPerspect103(Suppl3):49-54(1995)Keywords:biomarkers,exposureassessment,styrene,exhaledair,SCEs,measurementerror,dose-responserelationship,epidemiology,variancecomponentsIntroductionAmajorgoalofoccupationalandenviron-mentalepidemiologyhasbeentoevaluatetherelationshipsbetweenexposurestohaz-ardoussubstancesandtherisksofdisease.Unfortunately,fewexposure-responserela-tionshipshavebeenelucidatedbecauseoftheappallinglackofhistoricexposuredata.Thispaucityofinformationaboutexpo-surehasfosteredapplicationsofindirectmethodstodefinepastexposures(1)andThispaperwaspresentedattheConferenceonHumanTissueMonitoringandSpecimenBanking:OpportunitiesforExposureAssessment,RiskAssessment,andEpidemiologicResearchheld30March-1April1993inResearchTrianglePark,NorthCarolina.ThisworkwassupportedbygrantR010H02221fromtheNationalInstituteforOccupationalSafetyandHealthoftheCentersforDiseaseControlandPreventionandbygrantP42ES04705oftheNationalInstituteofEnvironmentalHealthSciences.TheauthorsappreciatetheassistanceofL.DionnefororganizingthefieldsurveysandofR.C.Yu,whomodeledtheexposure-doserelationships.AddresscorrespondencetoProfessorS.M.Rappaport,CB#7400,UniversityofNorthCarolina,ChapelHill,NorthCarolina27599-7400.Telephone(919)966-5017.Fax(919)966-4711.hasencouragedthenotionthatbiomarkersshouldbeusedprospectivelytodefineexposuresratherthanlevelsofcontami-nantsinair,water,orfood(2).Inthiscon-text,theterm"biomarker"referstoameasureofexposureintheformof"...anexogenoussubstanceoritsmetaboliteortheproductofaninteractionbetweenthexenobioticagentandsometargetmoleculeorcellthatismeasuredinacompartmentwithinanorganism"(3),andnottomea-suresofeffectorofsusceptibility,whichhavedistinctdefinitions(3).Inweighingtheadvantagesanddisad-vantagesofbiologicandenvironmentalmonitoringtodefineexposure,itisclearthatbiomarkersenjoyatleastthreetheo-reticaladvantagesandonemajordisadvan-tageovermedia-specificmeasurements.Ontheplusside,somebiomarkerscansub-stantiallysmooththeextremevariabilityinexposuretypicalofenvironmentaltoxicantsandtherebyreducethemonitoringeffort(4-6).ThisisillustratedinFigure1,whichshowstheexposuresofsixworkerstoinorganiclead(FigureIA)andtheasso-ciatedlevelsofbloodleadamongthesameindividuals(Figure1B)[datatakenfromCopeetal.(7)].Itisalsotruethatbiologi-calmonitoringaccountsforallroutes,i.e.,inhalation,ingestion,anddermalabsorp-tion,andtherebyprovidesameasureofthetotalexposurereceivedbytheindividual(3,8,9).Finally,variousbiomarkersaccountfordifferencesintheuptake,elim-ination,metabolism,andrepairoftoxicsubstancesamongexposedpersons(3,8,9).However,ontheminusside,thesamplingandanalyticdemandsofbiomarkersaregenerallygreaterthanthoseassociatedwithenvironmentalmeasurementsandcanleadtoreductionsinsamplesizesatagivencost.Thus,itremainstobeseenwhetherbiolog-icalmonitoringwillsupplantenvironmen-talmonitoringinfutureinvestigations.Sincefewstudieshavebeenpublishedwhichcomparelevelsofbiomarkerswithexposuresinthesamepopulation,it


View Full Document

Pitt EOH 2504 - The Relationship between Environmental Monitoring

Download The Relationship between Environmental Monitoring
Our administrator received your request to download this document. We will send you the file to your email shortly.
Loading Unlocking...
Login

Join to view The Relationship between Environmental Monitoring and access 3M+ class-specific study document.

or
We will never post anything without your permission.
Don't have an account?
Sign Up

Join to view The Relationship between Environmental Monitoring 2 2 and access 3M+ class-specific study document.

or

By creating an account you agree to our Privacy Policy and Terms Of Use

Already a member?