DOC PREVIEW
PSU IE 553 - Cycling Work

This preview shows page 1-2-3-4-5-6 out of 19 pages.

Save
View full document
View full document
Premium Document
Do you want full access? Go Premium and unlock all 19 pages.
Access to all documents
Download any document
Ad free experience
View full document
Premium Document
Do you want full access? Go Premium and unlock all 19 pages.
Access to all documents
Download any document
Ad free experience
View full document
Premium Document
Do you want full access? Go Premium and unlock all 19 pages.
Access to all documents
Download any document
Ad free experience
View full document
Premium Document
Do you want full access? Go Premium and unlock all 19 pages.
Access to all documents
Download any document
Ad free experience
View full document
Premium Document
Do you want full access? Go Premium and unlock all 19 pages.
Access to all documents
Download any document
Ad free experience
View full document
Premium Document
Do you want full access? Go Premium and unlock all 19 pages.
Access to all documents
Download any document
Ad free experience
Premium Document
Do you want full access? Go Premium and unlock all 19 pages.
Access to all documents
Download any document
Ad free experience

Unformatted text preview:

Slide 1Slide 2Cycling WorkMetabolic Energy Prediction/ModelingGarg ModelTasks - 1Tasks - 2Tasks - 3Major Variables/ModifiersComments - 1Comments - 2Ex. #1: Box LiftingGarg’s ModelSlide 14Ex. #1: Box Lifting – con’tEx. #1: Box Lifting – Total ĖValidationSlide 18Slide 19IE 5531IE 553 Engineering of Human WorkDr. Andris FreivaldsClass #28IE 5532IE 553 Engineering of Human WorkDr. Andris FreivaldsClass #28IE 5533Cycling Work•Lifting 8.25 lbs, 20 in., 6/min•Eave = 1.5 kcal/min, Er = 1.3 kcal/min•Ew = [Eave(Tw+Tr) - Er×Tr]/TwIE 5534Metabolic Energy Prediction/Modeling•Need: actual measurements on job:–Difficult, interferes with task–Costly, can’t measure new task•Basis:–Table values (Passmore & Durnin, 1955):•Crude, inaccurate•Many new jobs not found–Predictive models: Ǻberg (1968), Garg (1978)IE 5535Garg Model •Main assumptions (similar to MTM)–Ėjob = function of physical characteristics of job–Job broken down into simpler tasks– Ėjob = ∑ Ėtasks•Two components:1) Maintenance of body posture = sitting (Eq. 6.1), standing (Eq. 6.2), standing bent (Eq. 6.3) 2) Net increase due to tasksĖjob = [ ∑Ėposture × time + ∑ΔEtasks] / timeIE 5536Tasks - 11) Vertical lift:•Stoop lift (V<32", Eq. 6.4)•Squat lift (V<32", Eq. 6.5)•Arm lift (V>32", Eq. 6.7)2) Vertical lower:•Stoop lower (V<32", Eq. 6.8)•Squat lower (V<32", Eq. 6.9)•Arm lower (V>32", Eq. 6.10)IE 5537Tasks - 23) Walk/carry/hold:•Walk (Eq. 6.11)•Carry arms length (Eq. 6.12)•Carry at waist (Eq. 6.13)•Hold arms length (Eq. 6.14)•Hold at waist (Eq. 6.15)•Hold out in one hand (Eq. 6.16)4) Push/pull:•32" bench height (Eq. 6.17)•60" height (Eq. 6.18)IE 5538Tasks - 35) Lateral arm work:•Both hands 180° (Eq. 6.19)•One hand 180° (Eq. 6.20)•Stand 90° (Eq. 6.21)•Sit both hands 90° (Eq. 6.22)•Sit one hand 90° (Eq. 6.23)6) Horizontal arm work:•Stand (Eq. 6.24)•Sit (Eq. 6.25)IE 5539Major Variables/Modifiers•Individual characteristics:–Gender–Weight –Working style: posture, speed•Task characteristics:–Frequency–Load–Vertical range–Grade of surface–Horizontal distance movedIE 55310Comments - 1•Two regions for lift/lower: 1) 0-32“ (lift body weight)2) >32“ (lift arms only)•Freestyle lift = average stoop & squat lifts•Lift and lowers could have horizontal component (in addition to vertical)IE 55311Comments - 2•Estimate speed: –2 mph = 88 steps/min–3 mph = 108 steps/min•Climbing stairs: –ΔE(per step) = 0.1 + 0.0014 (BW+L) •ACU: lbs, in, mph, %IE 55312Ex. #1: Box Lifting •160 lb male, lifting 20 lb boxes, 10/min, from 30" bench to 40" conveyor•Required tasks?IE 55313Garg’s ModelIE 55314Ex. #1: Box Lifting 160 lb male, lifting 20 lb boxes, 10/min, from 30" bench to 40" conveyor1) Stoop lift 30"→ 32" ΔE = 10-4[0.375BW(32-h1) + (1.63L + 0.875 S×L)(h2-h1)]ΔE = 10-4[0.375(160)(32-30) + (1.63(20) + 0.875(20))(32-30)] = 0.0235 kcal/lift2) Arm lift 32"→ 40" ΔE = 10-4[0.06BW(h2-32) + (3.22L - 0.53 S×L)(h2-h1)]ΔE = 10-4[0.06(160)(40-32) + (3.22(20) - 0.53 (20))(40-32)] = 0.0507 kcal/liftIE 55315Ex. #1: Box Lifting – con’t3) Arm lower 40"→ 32" (no load)ΔE = 10-4[0.09BW(h2-32) + (1.03L + 0.37 S×L)(h2-h1)]ΔE = 10-4[0.09(160)(40-32)] = 0.0115 kcal/lower4) Stoop lower 32" → 30" (no load)ΔE = 10-4[0.31BW(32-h1) + 0.78L(h2-h1) + 13.25 S(32-h1)]ΔE = 10-4[0.31(160)(32-30) + 13.25(2)] = 0.0125 kcal/lowerStanding posture Ė = 0.0109BW = 0.0109(160) = 1.744 kcal/minIE 55316Ex. #1: Box Lifting – Total Ė Ėjob = [ ∑Ėposture × time + ∑ΔEtasks] / time∑ΔEtasks = 10×[0.0235 + 0.0507 + 0.0115 + 0.0125] = 0.982 kcalĖjob = 1.744(1) + 0.982 = 2.73 kcal/minIE 55317Validation •Stepwise multiple regression, with 3 males and 3 females, r2 = 0.98•Literature: 20 tasks, difference of 2.9 to 38%, average = 13.8%•Field work: 16 tasks, average difference = 5.6%•Garg found overprediction•Beginners typically underpredict•Best feature = relative comparison for redesign (careful with absolute values)IE 55318Garg’s ModelIE


View Full Document

PSU IE 553 - Cycling Work

Download Cycling Work
Our administrator received your request to download this document. We will send you the file to your email shortly.
Loading Unlocking...
Login

Join to view Cycling Work and access 3M+ class-specific study document.

or
We will never post anything without your permission.
Don't have an account?
Sign Up

Join to view Cycling Work 2 2 and access 3M+ class-specific study document.

or

By creating an account you agree to our Privacy Policy and Terms Of Use

Already a member?