Three PresentersTwo PresentersSeabirds and Marine Mammals Final Presentation GuideIn this course, each of you will be working together in groups of two or three, researching a particular seabird or marine mammal and then presenting your information to the class in a 15-minute oral presentation. This presentation will be worth 100 points. I have listed below what I expect from the presentations and how I will grade them.Suggested format for groups presentations.Time Three Presenters Two Presenters(minutes) Topic Presenter Topic Presenter1 Introduction(2min)Anyone(2min)Introduction(2min)Anyone(2min)23Body(12min)Presenter 1(4min)Body(12min)Presenter 1(6min)4567 Presenter 2(4min)89 Presenter 2(6min)1011 Presenter 3(4min)12131415 Conclusion(1min)Anyone(1min)Conclusion(1min)Anyone(1min)NOTE: IF YOU GO OVER YOUR ALLOTTED TIME, YOU WILL DEPRIVE YOUR PARTNER OF HIS/HER TIME.THEREFORE, PRACTICE! MAKE SURE YOUR PART OF THE PRESENTATION ISNOT TOO LONG, OR TOO SHORT.Your grade will have both a Group and an Individual component, which will be graded as follows:Group Grade: 25pts25pts of your grade are dependent upon the group's presentation, in particular how well the group was able to organize to make a good presentation. This is a function of time and energy spent working togetheron the presentation.24- 25: Well coordinated, well organized, enjoyable, all parts fit in the allotted time, shows effort above and beyond the average. It is obvious that everyone in the group worked and practiced together to make a smooth, fun presentation for the rest of the class. 22-23: Coordinated, organized, all parts fit in the allotted time. Students worked together on the presentation, but not very much or not very well. No one went over on his/her allotted time, but the parts don't flow that well.19-21: Not well coordinated, or organized, presenters exceed their allotted time. Information is presented and something can be learned, but it is obvious that the group did not work together. Consequently, the presentation was not enjoyable for the audience.<19: Major lack of organization, presenters exceed their allotted time such that it is impossible to follow the information. Students obviously did not work together on the presentation and it lacks continuityIndividual Grade: 75pts75 pts will depend upon your individual performance in those few (4 or 6) minutes that you have in front of the audienceThose 75 pts are broken down as follows.Organization: 25 pts The organization or you part of the presentation depends upon how much time you spent organizing it and how well and how often you practiced it.24- 25: Well organized, enjoyable, shows effort above and beyond the average, fits in the allotted time. It is obvious you spent a lot of time organizing and practiced often to make a smooth, fun presentation, that fitsin well with the other parts.22-23: Organized, fits in the allotted time. You made of plan of what you wanted to present and you obviously practiced your part, but not very much or not very well. Your part may be accurate, but does not fit in well with the other parts.19-21: Not well organized, you exceed the allotted time. Information is presented and something can be learned, but it is obvious you did not organize your part or practice it. Consequently, the presentation was not enjoyable for the audience.<19: Major lack of organization, you exceed the allotted time such that it hinders your partner. Students obviously did not organize or practice the presentation and it lacks continuityContent: 25 pts The content of your presentation depends upon how thoroughly you researched your topic, the number of sources you were able to find and how thoroughly you read each source.24- 25: Lots of interesting, accurate information that all fits well together to create a solid package that is enjoyable for the audience to watch. Your part fits well with the other parts and it makes logical connections with what has been or will be presented by your partner(s). Shows effort above and beyond the average. It is obvious you spent a lot of time researching.22-23: Adequate amount of information, though it may not be very interesting. The information is related to the rest of the presentation, but nological connections are made. It is obvious you researched the topic, but not very extensively.19-21: Could use more information. The information is not well related to the rest of the presentation. It is clear that you researched the topic, but probably only looked at one or two sources.Delivery: 25 ptsThe delivery of your presentation is a function of your visual aids and howwell you use them, how well you project your voice and whether you makeeye contact with the audience.24- 25: Well made visual aids that are very interesting and easy to read from the audience. You speak comfortably and clearly so that everyone in the room can hear you. You make lots of eye contact with the audience anddon't stare at your notes the entire time.22- 23: Visual aids that can be read from the audience. Your speech is adequate, but you may be somewhat nervous or fluctuate the volume of your speech. You make some eye contact with the audience.19-21: Visual aids need work and are hard to read. Your speech may be too nervous or you speak too quietly. You make some eye contact with theaudience, but not enough.<19: Visual aids are poor or lacking. Your speech makes it very hard for the audience to understand you. You do not make eye contact with the