This preview shows page 1 out of 2 pages.

Save
View full document
View full document
Premium Document
Do you want full access? Go Premium and unlock all 2 pages.
Access to all documents
Download any document
Ad free experience
Premium Document
Do you want full access? Go Premium and unlock all 2 pages.
Access to all documents
Download any document
Ad free experience

Unformatted text preview:

Models vs. Data Why do we compare the model to data? Introduction to Chi-Squared Analysis Bayesian View Conditional Probability10.34, Numerical Methods Applied to Chemical Engineering Professor William H. Green Lecture #22: Introduction: Models vs. Data. Models vs. Data Engineers think of practical problems and efficient solutions from the top-down. Scientists use a micro-view and can neglect the big picture in the bottom-up analysis. Models are always wrong. But experiments also never match. p(k)diffusion limit more important Ymodel(x(±δx), θ±δθ) “knobs” all other we generally parameters parameters know bounds in model we can that affect on θ physically adjust results prior information (cannot control) about θ Figure 1. Normal distribution. Ydata(1)(x) Ydata seldom have sampling capable of making Ydata(2)(x) true distribution curve P Average Value Figure 2. Example of sampling.<Ydata>Nexpts P P(<Y>Nexpts) <Y>Nexpts(<Ydata>,σdata)≈ σexp.data|Nexpts ()tsdatameanmeantrueNYYexp222exp21σσσπσ≈⎥⎥⎦⎤⎢⎢⎣⎡><−><− Why do we compare the model to data? • Is The Model Consistent With The Data? |<Ydata> - Ymodel |>> σmean means Inconsistent (akin to confidence interval: meantCIσνα⋅≅,) (Ydata(x))Figure 3. Normal distribution curve showing 1 standard deviation.Cite as: William Green, Jr., course materials for 10.34 Numerical Methods Applied to Chemical Engineering, Fall 2006. MIT OpenCourseWare (http://ocw.mit.edu), Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Downloaded on [DD Month YYYY].• Model Discrimination Often more than 1 model: If they are consistent, would like to be able to pick one closer to the data or say that either model works fine. • Parameter Refinement How narrow can you make the range on θ? • Experimental Design Identify which {θi} are not determined by data. A few θi often control the fit. Some θi cannot be determined well by experiment (poorly conditioned matrices). Introduction to Chi-Squared Analysis Assume all error is Gaussian. dataNinnelnnNxYxYaction~),()(22mod2∑−><≡σθχ for the “true” model 10.34, Numerical Methods Applied to Chemical Engineering Lecture 22 Prof. William Green Page 2 of 2 Cite as: William Green, Jr., course materials for 10.34 Numerical Methods Applied to Chemical Engineering, Fall 2006. MIT OpenCourseWare (http://ocw.mit.edu), Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Downloaded on [DD Month YYYY]. tsmeanNDSexpexp..~σ parameter refinement: χ2(θ) Å minimize χ2 by changing θexperimental design: derivatives of χ2 with respect to θ. Bayesian View Prior knowledge p(θ, σ) Æ posterior p(θ, σ; Ydata) More knowledge after experiment. Use to narrow error bars. Conditional Probability )|()()(12121EEPEPEEP =∩: probability of E2 knowing E1 happened (correlation) if independent: P(E2) model prior Pposterior(θ,σ|Ydata) = P(Ydata|θ,σ)P(θ,σ) ∫∫dθ dσ P(Y|θ,σ)P(θ,σ) ≈ P(Ydata) normalize P(Ydata|θ,σ): probability of observing Ydata we really observed if θ, σ are true values. We do not know θ and σ


View Full Document

MIT 10 34 - Lecture Notes

Documents in this Course
Load more
Download Lecture Notes
Our administrator received your request to download this document. We will send you the file to your email shortly.
Loading Unlocking...
Login

Join to view Lecture Notes and access 3M+ class-specific study document.

or
We will never post anything without your permission.
Don't have an account?
Sign Up

Join to view Lecture Notes 2 2 and access 3M+ class-specific study document.

or

By creating an account you agree to our Privacy Policy and Terms Of Use

Already a member?