DOC PREVIEW
TAMU PHYS 218 - phys218_Portfolio_050504c

This preview shows page 1-2-3-4 out of 12 pages.

Save
View full document
View full document
Premium Document
Do you want full access? Go Premium and unlock all 12 pages.
Access to all documents
Download any document
Ad free experience
View full document
Premium Document
Do you want full access? Go Premium and unlock all 12 pages.
Access to all documents
Download any document
Ad free experience
View full document
Premium Document
Do you want full access? Go Premium and unlock all 12 pages.
Access to all documents
Download any document
Ad free experience
View full document
Premium Document
Do you want full access? Go Premium and unlock all 12 pages.
Access to all documents
Download any document
Ad free experience
Premium Document
Do you want full access? Go Premium and unlock all 12 pages.
Access to all documents
Download any document
Ad free experience

Unformatted text preview:

Page 1 of 12 Physics 218 Course Portfolio Course Portfolio for PHYS 218 - Introductory Mechanics - 2004-2005 Peer Review Project T. Kamon Department of Physics, Texas A&M University Last Update: May 4, 2005Page 2 of 12 Physics 218 Course PortfolioInteraction One Overview of PHYS 218 PHYS 218 is the first-year, calculus-based physics course for non-physics majors at Texas A&M University (TAMU). The course covers classical mechanics, where most of students are engineering majors and freshmen, followed by PHYS 208 (‘electricity and magnetism’ course). Annual enrollment is about 2000 (1200 in fall semester, 800 in spring semester). A typical class size is 100 students. The lecture is led by faculty, while lab and recitation are led by graduate teaching assistants (TAs) with little faculty supervision and without any clear connection to the lectures. There was no rigorous grading of students’ lab reports (the score of each lab report was usually better than 90!), and TAs offered no feedback to students on how well they communicated what they were learning during the semester. Goals for the Course It is a challenge to train freshmen, so they can (i) read the problem and turn into a set of equations, (ii) solve the equations and (iii) evaluate the solution. This is a multi-step problem-solving skill that will be useful for any science and engineering courses. The best impact to students will be achieved if we provide a coherent effort for this goal in lecture, recitation and lab. At Department of Physics, we have been carrying out a pilot program (Visual Physics) to improve recitation and lab. In the recitation, we use interactive engagement (IE) between TA and students along with context-rich recitation quizzes. During the lab, all experiments are designed to use a video-based data acquisition followed by an analysis by Microsoft Excel and a short lab report, called Technical Memo. On the lecture side, it is up to each instructor so far. In the past years, my effort has been focused on providing elegant presentations (visual impacts) using PowerPoint, and providing a regular lecture style. Namely it starts with an introduction of principle, followed by a simplest example and solving a complex example problem. However, I found the presentations less impact on students’ exam performance. This can naturally be explained by a fact that my exams have been given in a traditional way (nothing to do visual presentation). They also often said “I cannot take note.” Therefore, I am quite interested in trying a Problem-Based Learning method. Unfortunately I haven’t had a chance to search articles on this before writing this portfolio. So, let me give you what I would like to do. Main change in my lecture will be: (a) Choose 4-5 problems each chapter of the textbook and convert them to context-rich problems. The context-rich problems may also come from their experiments in the lab. (b) The problems are given to students one week in advance. (c) Lecture will begin with one of context-rich problems, followed by a set of questions, such as “What kind of motion do you see?” and “What kind of forces do you identify?” to train them to teach how they start thinking of the problem. The question should guide them to think about the principle. (d) Show the physics principle(s) and set up the equations. (e) Solve the equations. (f) Evaluate the solution.Page 3 of 12 Physics 218 Course Portfolio(g) Repeat (c) – (f) for the second problem. To assess the impact of this new lecture, I keep the same home work problems from the textbook and maintain the style of exam. I also use Force Inventory Concept (FCI) problems to test students’ conceptual learning.Page 4 of 12 Physics 218 Course PortfolioInteraction Two For Interaction 2, I describe the specific teaching method, compared to my regular style. Regular Course Figures 1 and 2 are common syllabus for all PHYS 218 instructors. Below are some details of my regular PHYS 218 course: (1) Proficiency in mathematics: Students will be asked to take online math quizzes that are developed by Prof. D. Toback. If I identify students who are weakly prepared, provide a review and help. (2) Course Materials a) Textbook: University Physics, 11th ed. Young and Freedman, Addison-Wesley (This is a common textbook for PHYS 218 and 208.) b) Lecture notes (available online): http://faculty.physics.tamu.edu/kamon/phys218/class/class04C.htm c) Web-based (WebCT) home work submission d) Recitation: weekly quiz is given by TA. e) Lab: reports are required. Those reports are graded by TA. (3) Lecture style My lectures in the past provide a complete overview of theories in each chapter and then examples. As a result, I ran out of time to provide enough number of examples. Few numbers in each example seem to frustrate some students by saying they don’t learn anything from lectures.Page 5 of 12 Physics 218 Course Portfolio Figure 1: Common syllabus for PHYS 218 (fall 2004)Page 6 of 12 Physics 218 Course Portfolio Figure 2: Common syllabus for PHYS 218 (cont’d)Page 7 of 12 Physics 218 Course PortfolioProposed Changes As I mentioned earlier, the primary goal of this course portfolio is to test “Problem-based Learning” method in my lecture. Since I want to monitor an effect of the method, I intentionally maintain my course structure, but the lecture part. Adding the message to students in the first class meeting The course is based upon some problem solving skills using basic mathematics that you should have developed before taking this course. The learning experts say that for a course like this, everything must be learned three times. One must learn the material and then forget about it for three days or so. Your knowledge has largely evaporated. At that time you should re-learn everything but this process should be a little easier than the first time. After three days, this knowledge will again be gone and only after the third time learning it, will you be prepared to go into an exam and be able to work the problems without your mind “going blank.” This program of study requires time, so allocate your study time accordingly. Memorization is a valued skill but it is not very important this course. If you find that you must memorize many things, you are missing the point. This course is designed to teach you to THINK. To further de-emphasize memorization, you will be allowed to


View Full Document

TAMU PHYS 218 - phys218_Portfolio_050504c

Download phys218_Portfolio_050504c
Our administrator received your request to download this document. We will send you the file to your email shortly.
Loading Unlocking...
Login

Join to view phys218_Portfolio_050504c and access 3M+ class-specific study document.

or
We will never post anything without your permission.
Don't have an account?
Sign Up

Join to view phys218_Portfolio_050504c 2 2 and access 3M+ class-specific study document.

or

By creating an account you agree to our Privacy Policy and Terms Of Use

Already a member?