Introducing Formal Methods CIS 376 Bruce R Maxim UM Dearborn Adding Formal Methods to a Project Remember using formal methods is not an all or nothing process The level of rigor used should be tailored to fit the specific project with respect to system criticality level budget schedule technical environments Best Use of Formal Methods New system components adaptive or corrective maintenance Poorly understood requirements perfective maintenance Highly critical system components preventative maintenance Management Considerations part 1 Project staff expertise Formal Methods Expert seeks to match applications with appropriate methods tools and techniques Project Domain Expert evaluates candidate application and identifies the best to experiment with Project scale best to only try applying formal methods on 1 or 2 components the first time out can be viewed as a training exercise demonstrate value of formal methods with low risk Management Considerations part 2 Project training use existing staff with formal methods expertise provide in house hands on training with formal methods languages and support tools outside experts provide training and advice in early project stages Process integration strategy few changes needed if requirements analysis procedure are well defined formal methods can complement existing process steps Management Considerations part 3 Project guidelines and standards writing formal specifications requires guidelines similar to those found in existing configuration management procedures coding style guidelines documentation standards Guidelines will have the greatest impact on the project if they are in place before the project or training begins Technical Considerations part 1 Type of application applications with greater complexity will benefit more from formal methods use than simple applications logic and discrete math applications benefit more than numerical applications Size of application optimal code size is between 4K LOC and 25 KLOC Type of formal methods used project objectives better documentation or early defect detection Types of Analysis Formal Methods The preferred type of analysis and method is strongly influenced by the project objectives Modest Project Objectives for the Use of Formal Methods e g formal specifications for documentation Moderate e g early defect detection Ambitious e g assure correctness of critical properties or algorithms L4 Low Level of Rigor Moderate Level of Rigor High Level of Rigor Technical Considerations part 2 Level of rigor for formal methods usually determined by the methods dependence on automate tool support higher rigor more dependent Scope of formal methods use affected by number of system components degree of system functionality number of life cycle phases Level of Rigor for Formal Methods Increasing rigor is usually associated with increasing dependence on automated support tools require formal methods tools Levels of Rigor high informal manual reviews inspections L4 low modeling using logic and discrete mathematics medium formal specification language with type and syntax checking fully formal specification language with rigorous semantics and proof checking Scope of Formal Methods Use Three dimensions of scope of formal method use Number of System Components all components all functions most important selected function s component s single phase Degree of System Functionality L4 all phases Number of Phases in Life Cycle Technical Considerations part 3 Type of formal methods tools used must take project objectives level or rigor and scope into account when selecting a formal methods tool other important factors available training history of use ease of learning and ease of use effective support match with problem domain Plan for Introducing Formal Methods on a Project part 1 Identify formal methods and domain expertise expertise in both needed Define scale of formal methods involvement trial partial or full project Choose an application Select suitable formal methods to be use Plan for Introducing Formal Methods on a Project part 2 Select formal methods tools to use consider application and available resources Implement formal methods training Develop project guidelines analogous to those for conventional software engineering processes Track and document process changes update and revise process using measurement based project feedback Cost Considerations The act of formalizing specifications can be considered to be cost effective if you consider the cost associated with fixing defects later in the software life cycle Proof checking may be less cost effective so choose the problem domain wisely The highest level of rigor should be reserved for mission critical and highly complex system components Limitations of Formal Methods Formal methods are not a magic solution to all software development problems Need to use formal methods in suitable project environments if benefits are to exceed their costs Formal methods and domain expertise must be fully integrated to achieve positive results Benefits of Formal Methods Formal methods can help detect defects earlier in the software life cycle Formal methods can be applied with various levels of resource investment They can be integrated into existing process models with minimal disruption They can improve software quality Prerequisites to Using Formal Methods Need a reasonably mature disciplined development environment Environment should emphasize quality in fact quality ceilings may have been reached using traditional methods Project staff must have adequate expertise training and support