DOC PREVIEW
SC PHIL 110 - Powerpoint for lesson 31

This preview shows page 1 out of 3 pages.

Save
View full document
View full document
Premium Document
Do you want full access? Go Premium and unlock all 3 pages.
Access to all documents
Download any document
Ad free experience
Premium Document
Do you want full access? Go Premium and unlock all 3 pages.
Access to all documents
Download any document
Ad free experience

Unformatted text preview:

Slide 1Slide 2Slide 3DeMorgan’s Laws:¬(P ᴧ Q)  (¬P ᴠ ¬Q)¬(P ᴠ Q)  (¬P ᴧ ¬Q)Notice that the DeMorgan Laws capture an important relationship between the way negation interacts with conjunction and disjunction.But there are also underlying similarities between the universal quantifier and conjunction:∀x Cube(x)ifCube(a) ᴧ Cube(b) ᴧ Cube(c) ᴧ Cube(d) . . ."And also similarity between the existential quantifier and disjunction:"Ǝx Cube(x)ifCube(a) ᴠ Cube(b) ᴠ Cube(c) ᴠ Cube(d) . . .Because of these similarities, we have …DeMorgan Laws for Quantifiers:"¬∀x P(x)  Ǝx ¬P(x)¬Ǝx P(x)  ∀x ¬P(x)Just as with regular DeMorgan Laws, where you push the negation in (or out) of the phrase and ‘flip’ the connective, so with DeMorgans for Quantifiers you push the negation past the quantifier and ‘flip’ the quantifier


View Full Document

SC PHIL 110 - Powerpoint for lesson 31

Documents in this Course
Load more
Download Powerpoint for lesson 31
Our administrator received your request to download this document. We will send you the file to your email shortly.
Loading Unlocking...
Login

Join to view Powerpoint for lesson 31 and access 3M+ class-specific study document.

or
We will never post anything without your permission.
Don't have an account?
Sign Up

Join to view Powerpoint for lesson 31 2 2 and access 3M+ class-specific study document.

or

By creating an account you agree to our Privacy Policy and Terms Of Use

Already a member?