Unformatted text preview:

AIR QUALITY- Common themes between laws:o Nationally uniform standards sets by the EPAo Implemented by the EPA in cooperation with the Stateso Effect business and industry as well as the lives of citizens- Differences between lawso Controls for a different problemo Goalso Means- Causes of Air Pollution (by the EPA)o Stationary Sources  Combustion of fossil fuels Industrial and other processeso Mobil Sourceso Natural Sources Windblown dust Volcanic Eruptionso Area Sources Combination of small stationary sources- Effects of Air Pollutiono Human Health Premature deaths Respiratory, nervous system, cardiovascular, cancer Pg 146 of krafto Impact on Welfare Damage to trees and crops Reduced visibility Acid precipitation- damage to lakes, forestHistory of Air Pollution1800’s: cities regulate local emissions1900’s: Common Law Nuisance Action- Needed to prove causation and that it caused significant Harm- Remedy was money1963: Clean Air Act- Federal support for research- Assisted states for developing their own form of control- Considered inadequate1970: Clean Air Act Amendment- Found that:o The pollution crosses states lineso Dangers to public health and welfare from air pollutiono Prevention is the responsibility of the stateso Federal financial assistance and leadership is essential- Definition of welfare: effect on soils, water, crops, vegetation, animals, wildlife, weather, climate, visibility- Purpose: o Initiate a national research programo Provide financial and technical assistance to programsNational Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQSs) - Established by the CAA- Set criteria for Air Pollutantso Carbon monoxideo Particulateso Ozoneo Sulfur oxideso Nitrogen oxideso Lead- Set the max level of human exposures for the pollutanto Primary: to protect public healtho Secondary: protect welfare (forest, water, crops)o Most primary and secondary are the same- Uniform across the country- Implementation and enforcement are shared by state and federal governmento State Implementation Plan (SIP)o Federal Implementation Plan (FIP)- Set standards without considering costsSetting Environmental Standards- Science, values, economics all come into playOther Provisions of the CAA- Nonattainment Areaso Non attainment areas must have and implement a plan to meet the standard, or risk losing some forms of federal financial assistance- New Source Performance Standardso For new stationary sources or those that undergo major modifications- Emissions Trading for Acid Rain (SO2)o Cap and trade program- Limited Emissions for Hazardous Air Pollutants- New Permit Program for Major Stationary SourcesAir Quality Status- Has improved significantlyo Even as GDP and Population has increased- 2 Trillion in benefits vs. 65 billion in costs- Problemso Nonattainment Areas for ozone and particulateso Hazardous Air PollutantsIndoor Air Quality- Radon, second0hand smoke, mold- Synthetic materialsTrading Programs- Acid Rain- Nox Budget Trading Program- Clean Air Interstate Rule for SO2 and NOX\- Many success programsTransport of Air Pollutants- Clean Air Interstate Ruleo Goal is to reduce interstate pollutiono Required to consider local pollution as wells as impacts on other areaso Proposed for 2011Mercury- Clean Air Mercury Ruleo Regulated using the maximum achievable control technology_____________________________________________________________________________________________CLIMATE CHANGE DOMESTICGreenhouse gases- CO2- Methane (CH4)- Nitrous Oxide (N20)- Industrial gases (Anthropocentric-created by humans and added) o Hydrofluorocarbons (HFC’s)o Perfluorocarbons (PFC’s)o Sulfur Hexaflouride (SF6)- Ozone is not considered in GHG estimatedIPCC (Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change)- Established by the United Nations- Peer-reviewed literature and researchKey Findings of the US Global Climate Change Research Project- 13 federal agencies involved- Primary human induced- The changes are only going to grow- Climate change will stress water resources- Crop and livestock production will be challenged- Coastal areas are at risk- Risk to human health- Large changes in climate and ecosystems- Future climate change depends on choices made todayThe Debate over Climate Change- Polarizing political issues- Skeptics:o Errors in reportso Climategate (release of emails critical of dissenting viewpoints) (used as proof that they manipulated data)o Try to make science appear to be more confusing- Independent reviews:o Has proved at all conclusions are still valid- Public opinion is changing- No catastrophic event yetEffects of Climate Change- Sea level Riseo Changes in sea ice and habitso Coastal inhabitants- Heavy Rainso Sewage in drinking water supply- diseaseso Crops losses from flooding- Rising Temperatureso Tainted seafood – toxic algae, warmingo Death from heat wavesClimate Changes effect on Industries- Fisherieso Ocean acidificationo Changing predator/prey structures- Agricultureo Growing seasonso Crop yields (both + and -)- Forestry, Health, Tourism, Energy Production, City Planning, Agriculture, commerce, culture- Water Resourceso Earlier snow melto Alterations in river flowso Reduced precipitation in some areasEffects of Reducing Greenhouse Gas Emissions- Higher Energy Coasts- Impacts on Jobs and the Economy- Costs of New TechnologyState Policy Responses- Regional Greenhouse Gas Initiative (RGGI)- Other regional partnerships- Clean Air act waiverExecutive Branch Actions- The Clinton Administration determined that the CO2 is a pollutant- The Bush administration said that CO2 is not pollutant. And that the CAA was not designed to regulate greenhouse gases- Massachusetts v. EPA pushed EPA to acto CAA authorizes EPA to regulate GHGs if it fits the requirementso Found that “welfare” unambiguouso GHG’s are air pollutants and EPA must Make Endangerment finding- December 2009- GHG are anticipated to be a danger to public health- Found that motor vehicles contribute to air pollution Or Provide Reasoned explanation for why notContinuing Conflict- The severity of the problem- The extend of government intervention needed- Whether federal or state or local government should take eth lead role- Which policy approaches are effective, efficient, and fair______________________________________________________________________________________________________INTERNATIONAL CLIMATE CHANGEChallenges- Incentives- Different contributions to the problems- Different impact of climate change-


View Full Document

UMD ENSP 102 - Lecture notes

Documents in this Course
Load more
Download Lecture notes
Our administrator received your request to download this document. We will send you the file to your email shortly.
Loading Unlocking...
Login

Join to view Lecture notes and access 3M+ class-specific study document.

or
We will never post anything without your permission.
Don't have an account?
Sign Up

Join to view Lecture notes 2 2 and access 3M+ class-specific study document.

or

By creating an account you agree to our Privacy Policy and Terms Of Use

Already a member?