Computer Integrated Surgery II 600.446/646/452Spring 2004Russell H. TaylorTh-Fri 1:00-2:15Course concept• Combination: – Lectures on computer-integrated surgery and related subjects by instructor, guests– Projects– Seminar on current research• Similar material to 600.445, but with greater depth & implementation focus• Prerequisite: 600.445 or my consentCourse Numbers and Credits• 600.446 (3 credits)– Full course (lecture/seminar + project)– Advanced undergrads or grad students• 600.646 (3 credits)– Same as 600.446 but intended for grad students doing more advanced projects • 600.452 (1 credit)– Seminar onlyContact Information• TA = Xiaofeng Liu ([email protected])• Office Hours = Thursday 2:30/4:00• My office hours – By appointment (see Jen in NEB 315)– Will usually try to be in office 12-1 on class days• My lab meeting is Wed. 1:30-2:45• ERC Seminars Wed. 12-1:30 (lunch provided)Grades• 600.446/646– 25 % seminar presentation/writeup– 15 % project plan– 10 % project checkpoint presentation– 10 % project final presentation (poster presentation)– 40 % project implementation & final report• 600.452– Letter grade or Pass/Fail– Grade based on seminar presentation & critical summary of pertinent research papersDate conflicts• I will be out of town– 3/25-26; 4/22– Possibly 3/19, but plan to travel from meeting to be here– Possibly other dates later in year• We need to find make-up dates– Pick an evening (e.g., 5-7pm) or dawn (7-8am)– Evenings preferredSeminar Presentations• Select a single important paper or series of papers (2-5) relevant to your project or other interest• Give short (typically, 20 minutes) talk– Critical summary of what paper says & its significance• Bring hard copy of presentation materials to class to be put in your notebook•Also, write a short (3-5 page) critical review– Due day before talk ( give to my secretary for copying and distribution)– Will be flexible on due date for the first talks• Copy of paper will go into your notebook & one to me• Will be critiqued in class (in a friendly way)Typical Outline (modify as appropriate)• 1 slide statement of your project• Paper selection and why• Summary of problem & key result• Significance of key result• Necessary background• Description of what the author(s) actually did– Theory, experiment, etc.• Your assessment – Importance, relevance to you, good & bad points, etc.– Possible next steps for this work• ConclusionsRough Calendar• 1/31; 2/5-6: Discuss projects in class• Pick project & seminar topics by 2/15• Approved project proposals by 2/22• Project plan presentations 2/22 through mid march• Paper seminars March through April• Project checkpoints mid-March through April• Project poster session early May• Project final reports by 5/11(subject to confirmation)Projects• Typically will involve some substantial implementation/experimentation component• Require a “mentor” – Me, colleague, or an end user• Require funding/equipment support– Can come from me or end user• Require a defined plan and budget• Team projects encouragedProject Notebooks• Maintain a loose-leaf notebook with dividers• One copy for me (keep in my secretary’s office); at least one copy for you• Divide into sections• Sections for project proposal, all presentations, copies of background material, final report, etc.• A place for me to keep grade recordProject Proposals• Topic by 2/15; “Closed” plan by 2/22 or before• Approximately 3 page summary containing– Stated topic– Team members, mentor– Short statement of relevance/importance– List of “deliverables” (min, expected, max)– Short technical summary of approach– Key dates & assigned responsibilities– List of dependencies– Reading listProject Checkpoint Presentation• Approximately 20 minutes talk• Given in late March, early April• Summarize/update plan material• Present work to date• Present problems, exposures, dependencies• Bring hard copy of presentation materials to class to be put in your notebook• Will be critiqued in class (in a friendly way)Project Final Presentation (Poster)• Near end of semester• Standard format• Project should be done or nearly so• Present/demo results• Discuss work remaining to be done• Discuss significance of work• Discuss lessons learned• Prizes awarded in various categoriesProject Final Report• Technical summary– Similar to a short conference paper– Explain background, problem, approach, results, significance, etc.• Management summary (1 page)– Who did what– Discuss what was accomplished vs planned– Discuss what might be next• Technical appendices– Code, user’s manual, etc.Possible projects (examples)• Construction and extension of statistical atlases of bony anatomy (RHT)• Measure EM tracker distortion in different environments (RHT)• Evaluation of tool motion in DaVinci using EM tracker (RHT)• Calibrating (stereo)endoscopes for DaVinci (Hager)• Stereo vision algorithm implementation & benchmarking (Hager)• Interactive environment for surgical robots (RHT/kazanzides)• Cooperative manipulation for robotically-assisted ultrasonography (RHT)• Stereo visualization & performance tests with DaVinci (Marohn, Hanly)• Smart sensors for surgical retractors (Talamini)• iTK-based cartilage segmentation from CT(Armand, RHT)• iTK-based liver tumor segmentation from CT (Cleary)• Liver motion analysis under MRI (Cleary)• RF ablation treatment planning (Cleary, strong possible Choti tie-in)• Fluoroscopy calibration