DOC PREVIEW
UT Dallas CS 6390 - DatacenterTransport

This preview shows page 1-2-3-4-29-30-31-32-59-60-61-62 out of 62 pages.

Save
View full document
View full document
Premium Document
Do you want full access? Go Premium and unlock all 62 pages.
Access to all documents
Download any document
Ad free experience
View full document
Premium Document
Do you want full access? Go Premium and unlock all 62 pages.
Access to all documents
Download any document
Ad free experience
View full document
Premium Document
Do you want full access? Go Premium and unlock all 62 pages.
Access to all documents
Download any document
Ad free experience
View full document
Premium Document
Do you want full access? Go Premium and unlock all 62 pages.
Access to all documents
Download any document
Ad free experience
View full document
Premium Document
Do you want full access? Go Premium and unlock all 62 pages.
Access to all documents
Download any document
Ad free experience
View full document
Premium Document
Do you want full access? Go Premium and unlock all 62 pages.
Access to all documents
Download any document
Ad free experience
View full document
Premium Document
Do you want full access? Go Premium and unlock all 62 pages.
Access to all documents
Download any document
Ad free experience
View full document
Premium Document
Do you want full access? Go Premium and unlock all 62 pages.
Access to all documents
Download any document
Ad free experience
View full document
Premium Document
Do you want full access? Go Premium and unlock all 62 pages.
Access to all documents
Download any document
Ad free experience
View full document
Premium Document
Do you want full access? Go Premium and unlock all 62 pages.
Access to all documents
Download any document
Ad free experience
View full document
Premium Document
Do you want full access? Go Premium and unlock all 62 pages.
Access to all documents
Download any document
Ad free experience
View full document
Premium Document
Do you want full access? Go Premium and unlock all 62 pages.
Access to all documents
Download any document
Ad free experience
Premium Document
Do you want full access? Go Premium and unlock all 62 pages.
Access to all documents
Download any document
Ad free experience

Unformatted text preview:

Slide 1Transport in DatacentersData Center Packet TransportTCP in the Data CenterDatacenters and OLDIsPartition/Aggregate Application StructureGenerality of Partition/AggregateWorkloadsImpairmentsIncastQueue BuildupData Center Transport RequirementsTension Between RequirementsData Center TransportSlide 15Review: The TCP/ECN Control LoopTwo Key IdeasData Center TCP AlgorithmDCTCP in ActionWhy it WorksEvaluationCluster Traffic BenchmarkBaselineBaselineBaselineBaselineSlide 27D2TCP’s Main Idea and ContributionsD2TCP Cont’dD2TCP: Congestion AvoidanceD2TCP: Gamma Correction FunctionGamma Correction Function (cont.)Gamma Correction Function (cont.)Gamma Correction Function (cont.)D2TCP: Stability and ConvergenceD2TCP: Deadline-aware SchedulingWorkloadsMissed DeadlinesPerformance of Long-lived FlowsSlide 40Transport in DatacenterspFabric in 1 SlideConceptual modelDC Fabric: Just a Giant SwitchDC Fabric: Just a Giant SwitchDC Fabric: Just a Giant SwitchSlide 47“Ideal” Flow Schedulingpfabric designKey InsightpFabric SwitchpFabric Switch ComplexitypFabric Rate ControlpFabric Rate ControlWhy does this work?Overall Average FCTMice FCT (<100KB)ConclusionConclusion (DCTCP)Conclusion (D2TCP)Conclusion (pFabric)Slide 62Richard AntiabongUniversity of Texas at DallasTransport Layer Protocols for Data Centers1Most of the Slides adapted from the original conference presentationsTransport in Datacenters21000s of server portsDC network interconnect for distributed compute workloadsMsg latency is King traditional “fairness” metrics less relevant webwebappappdbdbmap-reducemap-reduceHPCHPCmonitoringmonitoringcachecacheData Center Packet Transport•Large purpose-built DCs–Huge investment: R&D, business•Transport inside the DC–TCP rules (99.9% of traffic)•How’s TCP doing?3TCP in the Data Center•We’ll see TCP does not meet demands of apps.–Suffers from bursty packet drops, Incast [SIGCOMM ‘09], ... –Builds up large queues:  Adds significant latency. Wastes precious buffers, esp. bad with shallow-buffered switches.•Operators work around TCP problems.‒Ad-hoc, inefficient, often expensive solutions‒No solid understanding of consequences, tradeoffs4Datacenters and OLDIsOLDI = OnLine Data Intensive applicationse.g., Web search, retail, advertisementsAn important class of datacenter applicationsVital to many Internet companiesOLDIs are critical datacenter applicationsTLAMLAMLAWorker Nodes………Partition/Aggregate Application Structure6Picasso“Everything you can imagine is real.” “Bad artists copy. Good artists steal.”“It is your work in life that is the ultimate seduction.““The chief enemy of creativity is good sense.““Inspiration does exist, but it must find you working.”“I'd like to live as a poor man with lots of money.““Art is a lie that makes us realize the truth.“Computers are useless. They can only give you answers.”1.2.3. …..1. Art is a lie…2. The chief… 3. …..1.2. Art is a lie… 3. …..Art is…Picasso• Time is money Strict deadlines (SLAs)• Missed deadline Lower quality resultDeadline = 250msDeadline = 50msDeadline = 10msGenerality of Partition/Aggregate•The foundation for many large-scale web applications.–Web search, Social network composition, Ad selection, etc.•Example: FacebookPartition/Aggregate ~ Multiget–Aggregators: Web Servers–Workers: Memcached Servers7Memcached ServersInternetWebServersMemcached ProtocolWorkloads•Partition/Aggregate (Query)•Short messages [50KB-1MB] (Coordination, Control state)•Large flows [1MB-50MB] (Data update) 8Delay-sensitiveDelay-sensitiveThroughput-sensitiveImpairments•Incast•Queue Buildup•Buffer Pressure9Incast10TCP timeoutWorker 1Worker 2Worker 3Worker 4AggregatorRTOmin = 300 ms• Synchronized mice collide. Caused by Partition/Aggregate.Queue Buildup11Sender 1Sender 2Receiver• Big flows buildup queues.  Increased latency for short flows.• Measurements in Bing cluster For 90% packets: RTT < 1ms For 10% packets: 1ms < RTT < 15msData Center Transport Requirements121. High Burst Tolerance–Incast due to Partition/Aggregate is common.2. Low Latency–Short flows, queries3. High Throughput –Continuous data updates, large file transfersThe challenge is to achieve these three together.Tension Between Requirements13High Burst ToleranceHigh ThroughputLow LatencyDCTCPDeep Buffers: Queuing Delays Increase LatencyShallow Buffers: Bad for Bursts & Throughput Reduced RTOmin (SIGCOMM ‘09) Doesn’t Help LatencyAQM – RED: Avg Queue Not Fast Enough for IncastObjective:Low Queue Occupancy & High ThroughputData Center TransportTwo techniques currently exist for meeting requirements of Data center transport.Traditional TCP approachData Center TCP (DCTCP)-Non-deadline awareDeadline-Aware Data Center TCP (D2TCP)-deadline awareNetwork assisted approachD3 Preemptive Distributed Quick (PDQ)pFabric14The DCTCP Algorithm15Review: The TCP/ECN Control Loop16Sender 1Sender 2ReceiverECN Mark (1 bit)ECN = Explicit Congestion NotificationTwo Key Ideas1. React in proportion to the extent of congestion, not its presence.Reduces variance in sending rates, lowering queuing requirements.2. Mark based on instantaneous queue length.Fast feedback to better deal with bursts.18ECN Marks TCP DCTCP1 0 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 Cut window by 50% Cut window by 40%0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 Cut window by 50% Cut window by 5%Data Center TCP AlgorithmSwitch side:– Mark packets when Queue Length > K.19Sender side:–Maintain running average of fraction of packets marked (α).In each RTT:Adaptive window decreases:–Note: decrease factor between 1 and 2.BKMarkDon’t MarkDCTCP in Action20Setup: Win 7, Broadcom 1Gbps SwitchScenario: 2 long-lived flows, K = 30KB(Kbytes)Why it Works1. High Burst ToleranceLarge buffer headroom → bursts fit.Aggressive marking → sources react before packets are dropped.2. Low LatencySmall buffer occupancies → low queuing delay.3. High Throughput ECN averaging → smooth rate adjustments, low variance.21Evaluation•Implemented in Windows stack. •Real hardware, 1Gbps and 10Gbps experiments–90 server testbed–Broadcom Triumph 48 1G ports – 4MB shared memory–Cisco Cat4948 48 1G ports – 16MB shared memory–Broadcom Scorpion 24 10G ports – 4MB shared memory•Numerous micro-benchmarks– Throughput and Queue


View Full Document

UT Dallas CS 6390 - DatacenterTransport

Documents in this Course
VoIP

VoIP

44 pages

TE-MPLS

TE-MPLS

38 pages

TCP

TCP

28 pages

QoS

QoS

27 pages

P2P

P2P

50 pages

IPv6

IPv6

81 pages

IPv6

IPv6

64 pages

AODV-v2

AODV-v2

19 pages

aodv

aodv

32 pages

19. P2P

19. P2P

50 pages

18. VoIP

18. VoIP

44 pages

17. QoS

17. QoS

27 pages

13. TCP

13. TCP

28 pages

6. IPv6

6. IPv6

81 pages

19. P2P

19. P2P

50 pages

18. VoIP

18. VoIP

44 pages

17. QoS

17. QoS

27 pages

6. IPv6

6. IPv6

81 pages

6. IPv6

6. IPv6

81 pages

19. P2P

19. P2P

50 pages

18. VoIP

18. VoIP

44 pages

17. QoS

17. QoS

27 pages

13. TCP

13. TCP

28 pages

CC

CC

74 pages

19. P2P

19. P2P

50 pages

18. VoIP

18. VoIP

44 pages

17. QoS

17. QoS

27 pages

13. TCP

13. TCP

28 pages

6. IPv6

6. IPv6

81 pages

CC

CC

74 pages

Load more
Download DatacenterTransport
Our administrator received your request to download this document. We will send you the file to your email shortly.
Loading Unlocking...
Login

Join to view DatacenterTransport and access 3M+ class-specific study document.

or
We will never post anything without your permission.
Don't have an account?
Sign Up

Join to view DatacenterTransport 2 2 and access 3M+ class-specific study document.

or

By creating an account you agree to our Privacy Policy and Terms Of Use

Already a member?