DOC PREVIEW
UGA FANR 3000 - CMR - Capture-Mark-Recapture
Type Lecture Note
Pages 2

This preview shows page 1 out of 2 pages.

Save
View full document
View full document
Premium Document
Do you want full access? Go Premium and unlock all 2 pages.
Access to all documents
Download any document
Ad free experience
Premium Document
Do you want full access? Go Premium and unlock all 2 pages.
Access to all documents
Download any document
Ad free experience

Unformatted text preview:

FANR 3000 1st Edition Lecture 13Outline of Last Lecture I. Imperfect detection II. Binomial distributionIII. Abundance IV. Detectability V. Distance Sampling Outline of Current Lecture I. Capture-Mark-RecaptureII. CMR Assumptions III. Abundance Estimation Current LectureI. Capture-Mark-Recapture- CMR- Most popular way to measure the size of a population- Used by fish and wildlife managers to estimate population sizes before fishing/hunting seasons- Uses the Lincoln-Petersen model to calculate population estimate1. A sample of the population is captured2. Individuals are marked and then returned to the population3. Population is re-sampledo Based on the idea that the proportion of marked animals in the 2nd sample should be the same as the proportion of marked animals of the entire population R/C=M/N  RN=MC N=MC/R  R= number of animals captured on the 1st visit that were then recaptured on the 2nd visitThese notes represent a detailed interpretation of the professor’s lecture. GradeBuddy is best used as a supplement to your own notes, not as a substitute. C= total numbers of animals captured on the 2nd visit (regardless of mark) M= total number of animals captured and marked on the 1st visit N= estimate of the total population size o However, it is biased for small capture samples Fixe bias using bias-adjusted estimate- N= (M+1)(C+1)/(R+1) – 1 II. CMR Assumptions- The accuracy of this capture-mark-recapture methods rests on a number of assumptions being met1. The population is “closed” (N is constant)a. The two visits to the study are are close enough in time so that no individuals dies, are born, move into the study area or move out of the study area between visits2. All individuals have the same chance of getting caught for both capturing periodsa. Marked individuals must not become easier or more difficult to catch 3. Marking individuals does not affect their ability to be caughta. The mark may make the individual more noticeable to predators or may slow them down, so more marked individuals die than unmarked between the sampling periods4. Individuals do not lose their marksa. Animals that shed or molt as they grow or as a response to seasonal factorsIII. Abundance Estimation - Estimating the total number in a population (N)o It’s usually impossible to get a census of a natural population of animals o We rely on an estimate A variety of estimation methods exist  Depends on the type of organism, habitat, time and


View Full Document

UGA FANR 3000 - CMR - Capture-Mark-Recapture

Type: Lecture Note
Pages: 2
Download CMR - Capture-Mark-Recapture
Our administrator received your request to download this document. We will send you the file to your email shortly.
Loading Unlocking...
Login

Join to view CMR - Capture-Mark-Recapture and access 3M+ class-specific study document.

or
We will never post anything without your permission.
Don't have an account?
Sign Up

Join to view CMR - Capture-Mark-Recapture 2 2 and access 3M+ class-specific study document.

or

By creating an account you agree to our Privacy Policy and Terms Of Use

Already a member?