DOC PREVIEW
UB PSY 331 - Exam 2 Study Guide

This preview shows page 1-2-3-4 out of 11 pages.

Save
View full document
View full document
Premium Document
Do you want full access? Go Premium and unlock all 11 pages.
Access to all documents
Download any document
Ad free experience
View full document
Premium Document
Do you want full access? Go Premium and unlock all 11 pages.
Access to all documents
Download any document
Ad free experience
View full document
Premium Document
Do you want full access? Go Premium and unlock all 11 pages.
Access to all documents
Download any document
Ad free experience
View full document
Premium Document
Do you want full access? Go Premium and unlock all 11 pages.
Access to all documents
Download any document
Ad free experience
Premium Document
Do you want full access? Go Premium and unlock all 11 pages.
Access to all documents
Download any document
Ad free experience

Unformatted text preview:

PSY 331 1st EditionExam # 2 Study Guide Social Cognition 2 & Person PerceptionWe See what we Want- Remember the self:o We seek positive self view (high SE)o We’ll work for ito Can we go too far?- Positive Illusion: seeing self in (objectively) overly positive lightMental health: classic definition- Positive self-regard- Ability to care for others- Ability to do productive work- Accurate view of reality- Survey of 1 million high school students:o 70% above median in leadership abilityo 60% above median in athletic abilityo 85% above median in ability to get along with othersPositive Illusions - Taylor & Brown (1988)- 3 types of positive illusions:o Unrealistically positive views of selfo Unrealistic optimismo Exaggerated perceptions of control- Unrealistically positive views of self:o We are all better than average Our friends, tooo Give selves credit for success, but not blame for failure E.g.: test grade- Self-serving biaso Rate ourselves higher than observers do Study: group interaction task, personality ratings - Unrealistic optimism:o We tend to be optimisticThese notes represent a detailed interpretation of the professor’s lecture. GradeBuddy is best used as a supplement to your own notes, not as a substitute. We believe present is better than past We expect future to be even better Particularly for us vs. otherso Expect what we want Not what is objectively likely- Exaggerated perceptions of controlo We tend to overestimate our ability to control eventso Gambling E.g.: you vs. other rolls the dice E.g.: langer lottery studyo Illusion of unique invulnerability  Bad things wont happen to me…- Because I control my outcomes- E.g.: flying vs. drivingCosts and benefits- Benefits of positive views/optimism o Task persistence & effort Trying in face of adversity  More likely to push envelope- Ultimately, better outcomes (on whole)o Physical health If optimism makes stress seem less “stressful”… Can have health benefits- E.g.: chronically seeing events as manageable vs. not- Costs of positive views/optimismo Maladaptive persistenceo Narcissism- Controlo Invulnerability illusion Physical health?- Not so goodo Critically ill patients Focus on controlling symptoms, life tasks = good adjustment Focus on impossible cure = not so goodSummary:1) We see what we expect:- Time and effort saver- Maintain inaccurate beliefso Act on them Self-fulfilling prophecy2) We see what we want- Positive illusions can be good…- But only in moderation- E.g.: seeing more control where some exists, not nonePerson Perception- How we form impressions of others & make inferenceso What they sayo What they doo What they look likeNonverbal Behavior- Six universal facial expressions:o Happinesso Sadnesso Surpriseo Fearo Disgusto Anger- How might emotional displays be functionally adaptive?o Immediately communicates infoo E.g., disgust- Gestureso E.g.: ok (symbol)- Personal spaceo (Example – close talker Seinfeld clip)- Body languageo E.g.: power posesAttributions- Inferences about the causes of behavior and events- Important distinction: internal (person) vs. external (situation)o Examples: Laying on the couch all day: lazy or ran a marathon A driver cuts you off: what a jerk or driving to hospital Coworker brought you a cupcake: nice person or wants something Your partner is being short with you: what a jerk or had a bad day- Bad behavior?o External elicits more sympathy- Good behavior?o Internal makes us like them more- Not always straightforwardo E.g., Why did Justin Bieber assault the limo driver? He’s a jerk (internal) vs. he was drunk (external) But aren’t these both internal states?- He isn’t drunk all the time- Consistency is important- Kelley’s (1972) Covariation Modelo How we make attributions- 3 types of info we use:- E.g.: student sleeps in classo 1) Consensus Does everyone act this way toward stimulus?o 2) Consistency Does this person act this way toward the same stimulus at other times/in other situations?o 3) Distinctiveness Does this person act this way only toward this particular stimulus?- Why did the student fall asleep?- 3 types of attributions – beyond int/exto Entity Object toward which behavior is directed- E.g.: my class is boringo Circumstances Conditions under which event occurs- E.g.: the student didn’t sleep well last nighto Person  Personality/ability- E.g.: the student is lazy- What if we have limited info?o E.g.: job interviewo Use general knowledge about others/the world- Discounting principle:o Our confidence in a given cause is reduced if other causes seem plausibleo Everyone would act this way? Decrease confidence it’s the person- Were not always rational- Fundamental attribution error:o We overestimate the impact of dispositional causes and underestimate the impact of situational causes of others’ behavior E.g.: StarbucksFundamental Attribution Error- Jones & Harris (1967)- Read essay written by other student- Manipulations:o Stance: pro vs. anti Castroo Freely chosen vs. assigned- DV:o “Is the writer pro or anti Castro?”- Results:o Participants made conclusions based on stance Regardless of whether topic was freely chosen or assigned- Implicationso Interpersonal relationshipso Perceptions of the advantaged and disadvantaged E.g.: financial/social resources from birth- Causes?o 1) Motivational influences Bad things happen Attributing people’s outcomes to something about them (vs. chance) reduces anxiety Just world belief:- People get what they deserve- “What goes around comes around”- Implications: rape, domestic abuse victimso 2) People are more salient than situations Taylor and Fiske (1975) Watch video of 2 people conversing Manipulation:- Video showed only 1 person or both DV: Ratings of who “set tone” Results: participants who saw only 1 person assigned that person responsibilityAttitudes and PersuasionWhat is an attitude?- Very difficult questiono Disagreement in the field- Technical definition (Eagly & Chaiken 1998):o Psychological tendency that is expressed by evaluating a particular entity with some degree of favor or disfavoro “Psychological tendency?”- Easy definition: positive or negative evaluation of an object- We have attitudes about all kinds of thingso Ourselves, other people, abstract concepts- Why are attitudes interesting…?o Big reason: influence behaviorEffects of attitudes on


View Full Document

UB PSY 331 - Exam 2 Study Guide

Documents in this Course
Load more
Download Exam 2 Study Guide
Our administrator received your request to download this document. We will send you the file to your email shortly.
Loading Unlocking...
Login

Join to view Exam 2 Study Guide and access 3M+ class-specific study document.

or
We will never post anything without your permission.
Don't have an account?
Sign Up

Join to view Exam 2 Study Guide 2 2 and access 3M+ class-specific study document.

or

By creating an account you agree to our Privacy Policy and Terms Of Use

Already a member?