DOC PREVIEW
UI LAW 8006 - Guaranty Trust Co. of New York v. York

This preview shows page 1 out of 2 pages.

Save
View full document
Premium Document
Do you want full access? Go Premium and unlock all 2 pages.
Access to all documents
Download any document
Ad free experience

Unformatted text preview:

Case Brief Civ Pro Bauer State law in federal courts procedural questions 2 7 15 Identity of Case Guaranty Trust Co of New York v York 326 U S 99 1945 Page 921 of the casebook Summary of Facts Procedural History York is a representative of a class action that brings civil suit against Guaranty Trust co Diversity jurisdiction federal court etc Guaranty s defense was basedon the fact that the statute of limitations had passed on York s claim state based statute of limitations state based claim Federal court hears it anyways Second Cir Affirms SCOTUS affirms Statement of the Issue Are the statute of limitations laws of a state a substantive right which the federal gov t is entitled to follow or a procedural right which they do not Holding Statute of limitations represent a substantive right not to be sued after a certain amount of time protect from surprise attacks etc Although they have some procedural effects they are mostly substantive Federal courts therefore must follow them Reasoning Not doing so would conflict with the goal of horizontal uniformity that Erie stands for The operation of a double system of conflicting laws in the same State is plainly hostile to the reign of law Evaluation


View Full Document
Loading Unlocking...
Login

Join to view Guaranty Trust Co. of New York v. York and access 3M+ class-specific study document.

or
We will never post anything without your permission.
Don't have an account?
Sign Up

Join to view Guaranty Trust Co. of New York v. York and access 3M+ class-specific study document.

or

By creating an account you agree to our Privacy Policy and Terms Of Use

Already a member?