DOC PREVIEW
UI LAW 8006 - Gordon v. Steele

This preview shows page 1 out of 2 pages.

Save
View full document
Premium Document
Do you want full access? Go Premium and unlock all 2 pages.
Access to all documents
Download any document
Ad free experience

Unformatted text preview:

Case Brief Civ Pro unit B1b 1 17 15 Identity of Case Gordon v Steele 376 F Supp 575 W D Pa 1974 Page 42 of the casebook Summary of Facts Procedural History Gordon whose parents live in Pennsylvania but who is also a college student living in Ohio sues her doctors based in Pennsylvania for medical malpractice in Federal court Defendant motions for dismissal due to lack of jurisdiction claiming Gordon is a Pennsylvania resident no diversity jurisdiction TC rules that Gordon is a citizen of Ohio for the purposes of diversity jurisdiction Statement of the Issue Whether a college student who does not intend to return to her parent s house has acquired a new domicile for the purposes of diversity jurisdiction Holding Under the domicile test a person acquires a new domicile when they leave their old one establish a place of residence where they intend to live indefinitely and have no intention of returning to the old domicile to live note some jurisdictions indefinitely is replaced with permanently Reasoning Court listened to arguments on both sides but the intent is what makes it a domicile Plaintiff has a very easy argument Evaluation Low standard for getting into court


View Full Document
Loading Unlocking...
Login

Join to view Gordon v. Steele and access 3M+ class-specific study document.

or
We will never post anything without your permission.
Don't have an account?
Sign Up

Join to view Gordon v. Steele and access 3M+ class-specific study document.

or

By creating an account you agree to our Privacy Policy and Terms Of Use

Already a member?