DOC PREVIEW
MIT 16 810 - Cross Over Bike: Frogger

This preview shows page 1 out of 3 pages.

Save
View full document
View full document
Premium Document
Do you want full access? Go Premium and unlock all 3 pages.
Access to all documents
Download any document
Ad free experience
Premium Document
Do you want full access? Go Premium and unlock all 3 pages.
Access to all documents
Download any document
Ad free experience

Unformatted text preview:

Team 3 Laura Condon JoHanna Przybylowski Cross Over Bike: Frogger Version 2 A cross over bike is to be designed for the mass consumer market. The expected sales volume is 100,000 per year. Affordability, excellent performance/cost ratio and light weight are most important to be successful in this market. Below is an initial design for manufacturing. The table lists the design requirements and the FEM testing results for a load case of f1 = 50 lbs, f2 = 75 lbs and f3 = 75 lbs. Requirement Required FEM Result: Version 1 FEM Result: Version 2 Manufacturing Cost ≤ 5.2$/part $5.22 $5.05 Performance: d1 ≤ 0.060 mm0.052 mm 0.045mm d2 ≤ 0.009 mm0.0034 mm 0.0055mm First Natural Frequency(Restrained) ≥ 295 Hz 289 Hz 272 Hz First Natural Frequency(Unrestrained) ≥ 505 Hz 476 Hz 487 Hz Mass ≤0.27 lb 0.246 lb 0.27 lb Figure 1 below shows our initial manufactured design. We arrived at this design through two major modifications on an initial sketch. Theses modifications were based on FEM results. The first modification was to move the bar, which had connected the two fixed holes, to a diagonal bar connected the two rightmost holes. The second major modification was to use the design freedom for the location of the leftmost hole. The hole was moved diagonally upward to the limit of the design freedom. Other minor modifications included the redistribution of mass through editing bar thickness. Figure 2 below shows the modified manufactured design. Reducing cost was the driving factor for the modifications made after the initial manufactured part was tested. Fillet radii were increased whenever possible. Straight paths were made tangent to the circles rather then fillets inserted to join the circle and path. The constraining factor for reducing cost was the mass.Figure 1. Initial manufactured frame for the Frogger model.Figure 2. Final manufactured frame for the Frogger


View Full Document

MIT 16 810 - Cross Over Bike: Frogger

Download Cross Over Bike: Frogger
Our administrator received your request to download this document. We will send you the file to your email shortly.
Loading Unlocking...
Login

Join to view Cross Over Bike: Frogger and access 3M+ class-specific study document.

or
We will never post anything without your permission.
Don't have an account?
Sign Up

Join to view Cross Over Bike: Frogger 2 2 and access 3M+ class-specific study document.

or

By creating an account you agree to our Privacy Policy and Terms Of Use

Already a member?