DOC PREVIEW
UB PSC 101 - Exam 1 Study Guide

This preview shows page 1-2-3-4-5 out of 16 pages.

Save
View full document
View full document
Premium Document
Do you want full access? Go Premium and unlock all 16 pages.
Access to all documents
Download any document
Ad free experience
View full document
Premium Document
Do you want full access? Go Premium and unlock all 16 pages.
Access to all documents
Download any document
Ad free experience
View full document
Premium Document
Do you want full access? Go Premium and unlock all 16 pages.
Access to all documents
Download any document
Ad free experience
View full document
Premium Document
Do you want full access? Go Premium and unlock all 16 pages.
Access to all documents
Download any document
Ad free experience
View full document
Premium Document
Do you want full access? Go Premium and unlock all 16 pages.
Access to all documents
Download any document
Ad free experience
Premium Document
Do you want full access? Go Premium and unlock all 16 pages.
Access to all documents
Download any document
Ad free experience

Unformatted text preview:

PSC 101Exam # 1 Study Guide Lectures: 1 - 6Part I IntroductionKey Focus:Three Common Problems1. Social Choice Problems2. Collective Action Problems3. Principal-Agent ProblemsSocial Choice Problems- Majority vote will fail- There is no mandate- (Condorcet procedure) Everything against everything else where something wins every time [fails]- Everyone has a preference but final decision is something that no one wants- Arguing over process is arguing over preferenceCollective Action Problems- Everyone is worse of- Individuals better of not contributing - Groups of people better of contributing as a wholeSolving Collective Action Problems- The power to prevent More interaction but with possible punishment at hand- Force Appoint someone to punish those who don’t follow the rules Ex. Mafia (pay taxes or go to jail)Principal-Agent Problems- Agent works for principal- Problem comes from asymmetric information (misinformation and imbalance of power)- Higher person in charge of person below them- Main goal is to get the agent to work in the interests of the principal for the lowest cost possibleSolving Principal-Agent Problems (Controlling Agents)- Monitoring Make sure the agent is doing what the principal wants  Expensive in terms of time Can lead to false fidelity where the agent does what principal demands instead of their actual interest- Incentive Structures Agent gets a portion of the principal’s earnings More equality between agent and principal This method does not work in politics- Find a Compatible Agent Agent and principal have same interests People lie and may not actually have the same interestsPart II ConstitutionSocial Contract Theory- Belief that the government was formed by the opinions of the people- Social contract: universal agreement that avoids anarchy and into a normal government- No more divine right- It would be unpleasant and inconvenient if people ruled themselves- Hobbes vs. Locke Hobbes Human nature is dark without control from the government We need strong laws We the people are a problem We have the right to protect ourselves Locke We will be ok if we leave each other alone Right to investigate and have trial Hire people to do our jobs Principal-agent relationshipArticles of Confederation- First try for a “national” government for the United States as a whole- Result of the early-Revolutionary Continental Congress- Similar to the UN- Problem: national government was too weakWeak Government Under the Articles- No direct control over states- Can’t tax- Each states had one vote Problems With the Articles- Debt- Problems with trade- Economic downturn- Shay’s Rebellion (farmer want inflation to make debt go away)- People want new contractConstitutional Convention- Took place in 1787- Met in PA to discuss amending the Articles- No authority given to propose a new constitution- Federalists vs. Anti-federalists Federalists Favored stronger central government Thought the system was broken Anti-federalists Just wanted to tweak the Articles Favored stronger state governmentsThe Big Problem- Disagreement between large and small states- VA (large) vs. NJ (small)- CT Compromise VA, NJ, and CT PlansVA:- Apportioned by population- Senate chosen by House- Executive selected by House- Judiciary chosen by legislature- Council of RevisionNJ:- Equal representation- No Senate- Executive selected by legislature- Judiciary appointed by executive- No clear vetoCT:- One house each- Senate selected by state legislature- Executive selected by electors- Judiciary appointed by executive and confirmed by Senate- Presidential vetoProblem for FramersWanted to create a strong, newer, and more active government that wasn’t too strong or too active. They also didn’t trust a majority of the people to have good judgment. FactionGroup of people with an interest for something bad, which “trample on people’s rights”Preventing Factions- Give everyone the same thing (impossible)- Abolish liberties- We can’t prevent factions we can only try to limit them by: A large republic  Representation Diferent length terms Checks and balancesFear of Unstable Preferences- Bicameral Congress with indirectly elected Senate- Difficult amendment process 2/3 of each House of Congress Ratification by ¾ of state legislature 2/3 of state legislatures can call a convention to propose amendmentsPart III Public OpinionPublic Opinion- Citizens’ views on politics and government actions- A person’s attitude, view, and opinion- Opinions based of of attitude- Only opinions can be seen- The average statement given in a pollAttitude- Valence cognition towards something- An internal mental picture something can be bad, good, or indiferent- The root of many political activities- Can’t measure attitudes directlyOpinion- A basic question and answer exchange- Your response is your opinion- Can be based of of many attitudes- “Latent opinion” is a building opinionKey Focus:Qualities of Public Opinion1. Direction2. Intensity3. SalienceDirection- Positive or negative - Agree or disagree- Pay attention to large scale shiftsIntensity- Low intensity means that they wouldn’t give up much for it- High intensity means that they would give up much- Intensity matters- Intense minority can defeat less-intense majoritySaliency- Politically relevant- Matters to people- Matters to journalists- Matters to government- Not the same as intensityMeasuring Public Opinion- Done by polling- Done randomly- Small sample sizes (compared to entire population of US)- 1,000 good sample for 10,000 as well as 10,000,0000 if done right- Population size doesn’t matterUser’s Guide to Polls- When looking at TV poll results pay attention to Sample size or margin or error Sampling technique Population of interest Question wording Question orderSample Size- Sample size and margin error say the same thing- Margin of error is usually 3% out of a sample size of 1,000- The less respondents the larger the margin of error- Subgroups have a large margin of errorSampling Technique- Random phone polling Any valid number can be dialed Cheap- Internet polls Bad because can be clicked multiple times- Phone-in polls- Write-in


View Full Document

UB PSC 101 - Exam 1 Study Guide

Download Exam 1 Study Guide
Our administrator received your request to download this document. We will send you the file to your email shortly.
Loading Unlocking...
Login

Join to view Exam 1 Study Guide and access 3M+ class-specific study document.

or
We will never post anything without your permission.
Don't have an account?
Sign Up

Join to view Exam 1 Study Guide 2 2 and access 3M+ class-specific study document.

or

By creating an account you agree to our Privacy Policy and Terms Of Use

Already a member?