DOC PREVIEW
UK MA 111 - The Mathematics of Sharing

This preview shows page 1-2-3 out of 8 pages.

Save
View full document
View full document
Premium Document
Do you want full access? Go Premium and unlock all 8 pages.
Access to all documents
Download any document
Ad free experience
View full document
Premium Document
Do you want full access? Go Premium and unlock all 8 pages.
Access to all documents
Download any document
Ad free experience
View full document
Premium Document
Do you want full access? Go Premium and unlock all 8 pages.
Access to all documents
Download any document
Ad free experience
Premium Document
Do you want full access? Go Premium and unlock all 8 pages.
Access to all documents
Download any document
Ad free experience

Unformatted text preview:

Excursions in Modern Mathematics, 7e: 3.2 - 1 Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. 3 The Mathematics of Sharing 3.1 Fair-Division Games 3.2 Two Players: The Divider-Chooser Method 3.3 The Lone-Divider Method 3.4 The Lone-Chooser Method 3.5 The Last-Diminsher Method 3.6 The Method of Sealed Bids 3.7 The Method of MarkersExcursions in Modern Mathematics, 7e: 3.2 - 2 Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. The divider-chooser method (also called the you cut–I choose method) can be used when the fair-division game involves two players and a continuous set S As this name suggests, one player, called the divider, divides S into two shares, and the second player, called the chooser, picks the share he or she wants, leaving the other share to the divider.!Divider-Chooser MethodExcursions in Modern Mathematics, 7e: 3.2 - 3 Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. This method guarantees that divider and chooser will each get a fair share (with two players, this means a share worth 50% or more of the total value of S). !Not knowing the chooser’s likes and dislikes (privacy assumption), the divider can only guarantee himself a 50% share by dividing S into two halves of equal value (rationality assumption); the chooser is guaranteed a 50% or better share by choosing the piece he or she likes best. !Divider-Chooser MethodExcursions in Modern Mathematics, 7e: 3.2 - 4 Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. On their first date, Damian and Cleo go to the county fair. They buy jointly a raffle ticket and win a half chocolate–half strawberry cheesecake. Damian likes chocolate and strawberry equally well, so in his eyes the chocolate and strawberry halves are equal in value. Damian and Cleo Divide a CheesecakeExcursions in Modern Mathematics, 7e: 3.2 - 5 Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. However, Cleo hates chocolate so the chocolate part of the cake is worth 0% of the whole cake, and the strawberry part is worth 100% of the whole cake (as far as Cleo is concerned.!Damian and Cleo Divide a Cheesecake To ensure a fair division, we assume neither of them knows anything about the other’s likes and dislikes.Excursions in Modern Mathematics, 7e: 3.2 - 6 Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Damian volunteers to go first (the divider). According to Damien’s value system, any physical half of the cake is a fair share, so he cuts the cake into two halves, ignoring the amount of strawberry / chocolate in either half. It is now Cleo’s turn to choose, and her choice is obvious: she will pick the piece having the Damian and Cleo Divide a Cheesecake larger strawberry part.Excursions in Modern Mathematics, 7e: 3.2 - 7 Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Final outcome: Damian gets a piece that is worth exactly half of the cake (According to Damian’s value system) Cleo ends up with a much sweeter deal–a piece that in her own eyes is worth about two-thirds of the cake. (According to Cleo’s value system) This is a fair division of the cake–both players get pieces worth 50% or more (according to their respective value systems)!Damian and Cleo Divide a CheesecakeExcursions in Modern Mathematics, 7e: 3.2 - 8 Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. This example illustrates that it is better to be the chooser than the divider. The divider is guaranteed a share worth exactly 50% of the total value of S, The chooser could end up with a share worth more than 50%. (If the players each had the same value system they would each end up with exactly 50%. The differences between their value systems is what allows the chooser to (potentially) end up with more than 50%) Better to be the


View Full Document
Download The Mathematics of Sharing
Our administrator received your request to download this document. We will send you the file to your email shortly.
Loading Unlocking...
Login

Join to view The Mathematics of Sharing and access 3M+ class-specific study document.

or
We will never post anything without your permission.
Don't have an account?
Sign Up

Join to view The Mathematics of Sharing 2 2 and access 3M+ class-specific study document.

or

By creating an account you agree to our Privacy Policy and Terms Of Use

Already a member?