PowerPoint PresentationTHE PM’S ROLESFacilitatorCommunicatorVirtual Project ManagerTHE PM’S RESPONSIBILITIES TO THE PROJECTThree Overriding ResponsibilitiesNegotiation, Conflict Resolution, and PersuasionSELECTION OF A PROJECT MANAGERKey CriteriaFITTING PROJECTS IN THE PARENT ORGANIZATIONMore on “Why Projects?”Project Organization ContinuumFigure 2-2 The Pure Project OrganizationThe Pure Project OrganizationFigure 2-3 Functional Project OrganizationFunctional Project OrganizationFigure 2-4 Matrix Project OrganizationMatrix Project OrganizationFigure 2-5 Mixed Project OrganizationTHE PROJECT TEAMCharacteristics of Effective Project Team Members2-1The Manager, the Organization, and the Team2-2THE PM’S ROLES2-3FacilitatorManager-As-Supervisor Versus Manager-As-FacilitatorSystems Approach Versus Analytical Approach–suboptimizationMust ensure project team members have appropriate knowledge and resourcesMicromanagement2-4CommunicatorFigure 2-1 Communication Paths Between a Project’s Parties-At-Interest2-5Virtual Project ManagerGeographically Dispersed ProjectsCommunication Via–email–Web–telephone–video conferencing“Never let the boss be surprised!”2-6THE PM’S RESPONSIBILITIES TO THE PROJECT2-7Three Overriding ResponsibilitiesAcquiring Resources–getting necessary quantity and quality can be key challenge–“irrational optimism”Fighting Fires and ObstaclesLeadership and Making Trade-Offs2-8Negotiation, Conflict Resolution, and PersuasionNecessary to meet three overriding responsibilities2-9SELECTION OF A PROJECT MANAGER2-10Key CriteriaCredibility - The PM is believable–technical credibility–administrative credibilitySensitivity - Politically Astute and Aware of Interpersonal ConflictLeadership, Style, Ethics - Ability to Direct Project in Ethical Manner2-11FITTING PROJECTS IN THE PARENT ORGANIZATION2-12More on “Why Projects?”Emphasis on Time-to-MarketNeed for Specialized Knowledge from a Variety of AreasExplosive Rate of Technological ChangeAccountability and Control2-13Project Organization ContinuumFunctionalOrg.Functional MatrixMatrixBalancedProjectMatrixProjectOrg.Functional Mgrs. have most if not all authorityProject Mgrs. havemost if not all authority2-14Figure 2-2 The Pure Project Organization2-15The Pure Project OrganizationAdvantages–Effective and efficient for large projects–Resources available as needed–Broad range of specialists–short lines of communicationDrawbacks–Expensive for small projects–Specialists may have limited technological depth–May require high levels of duplication for certain specialties2-16Figure 2-3 Functional Project Organization2-17Functional Project OrganizationAdvantages–technological depth–Fractional resource issue is minimizedDrawbacks–lines of communication outside functional department slow–technological breadth–project rarely given high priority2-18Figure 2-4 Matrix Project Organization2-19Matrix Project OrganizationAdvantages–flexibility in way it can interface with parent organization–strong focus on the project itself–contact with functional groups minimizes projectitis–ability to manage fundamental trade-offs across several projectsDrawbacks–violation of the Unity of Command principle–complexity of managing full set of projects–conflict2-20Figure 2-5 Mixed Project Organization2-21THE PROJECT TEAM2-22Characteristics of Effective Project Team MembersTechnically CompetentPolitically SensitiveProblem OrientationGoal OrientationHigh
View Full Document