Introduction to Semantic Web Service Architecture The vision of the Semantic Web Ontologies as the basic building block Semantic Web Service Architecture Phases of Semantic Web Services The Vision 500 million users more than 3 billion pages Static WWW URI HTML HTTP The Vision Serious Problems in Static information finding information extracting information representing information interpreting and and information maintaining WWW Semantic Web URI HTML HTTP RDF RDF S OWL The Vision Dynamic Static Web Services UDDI WSDL SOAP Bringing the computer back as a device for computation WWW Semantic Web URI HTML HTTP RDF RDF S OWL The Vision Bringing the web to its full potential Dynamic Static UDDI WSDL SOAP Semantic Web Services WWW Semantic Web URI HTML HTTP RDF RDF S OWL Web Services Deficiencies of WS Technology current technologies allow usage of Web Services but only syntactical information descriptions syntactic support for discovery composition and execution Web Service usability usage and integration needs to be inspected manually no semantically marked up content services no support for the Semantic Web current Web Service Technology Stack failed to realize the promise of Web Services Semantic Web Services Semantic Web Technology allow machine supported data interpretation ontologies as data model Web Service Technology automated discovery selection composition and web based execution of services Semantic Web Services as integrated solution for realizing the vision of the next generation of the Web SWSA What is it about SWSA Semantic Web Services Initiative Architecture has created a set of architectural and protocol abstractions that serve as a foundation for Semantic Web service technologies This paper describes the protocols exchanged between the interacting entities or agents that interpret and reason with semantic descriptions in the deployment of Semantic Web services Terminologies Used Web Service software system designed to support interoperable machine to machine interaction over a network Semantic Web Service layer on top of the web service infrastructure to supply semantic meaning for web services Agent software SWSA Architectural Framework Addresses five classes of Semantic Web agent requirements 1 Dynamic Service Discovery 2 Service Engagement 3 Service process enactment 4 Community support services 5 Quality of service Assumptions Agents can access interpret and communicate using ontologies Service providers publish semantic descriptions of service capabilities and interaction protocols Requesting agents delegate internal objectives as requests to service providers Phases of Semantic Web Service Interaction Candidate service discovery Service engagement Service enactment Service interaction process Service Discovery Process of identifying candidate services by clients to achieve their objectives Stakeholders Service providers use published protocol Service requestors use query protocol Matchmakers Service discovery requirements Language requirements Functional requirements Architectural requirements Language requirements For expressing capabilities and goals Services characteristics and constraints Message semantics protocol during interaction Requester requirements goal quality security and privacy Functional Requirements What are the task for each entity Providers must describe the capabilities and constraints on offered services Requestors must create abstract characterizations of required services to facilitate matching with published capabilities Requestors must locate and interact with peers or matchmakers that can respond to queries for advertised service descriptions Matchmakers must compare descriptions of queries and capabilities Requestors must decide if they can satisfy the preconditions specified in a prospective service s selfdescription in order to use it Architectural requirement advertising protocols used by service providers candidate service discovery protocols used by requestors Why needed Identify the various classes of agents for final result Service Engagement Initial phase of interaction between requestor and potential provider Results in an agreement Service engagement requirements Functional requirements o Service request Formulation o Contract preliminaries o Contract Negotiation o Agreement Architectural requirements o o o Negotiation protocols Negotiation services Auditing services Engagement message semantics Negotiation Protocols FIPA query reply protocol equivalent to Agree with no acknowledgement and No negotiation FIPA request protocol equivalent to Agree or refuse No negotiation But commitment to provide a service negotiate commitment A formal negotiations No party left hanging Shared acknowledgement of a contract or commitment between them Negotiate Commitment Protocol Service Enactment Service is ready to be initiated Requestor determines the information necessary to request performance of service and appropriate reaction to service success or failure Service enactment requirements Functional requirements o o o o Response interpretation Response translation Process mediation and delegation etc Architectural requirements o o o o Process mediation services Process scheduling and composition services Process execution and status logging services Policy monitoring services Enactment Protocols Three types enactment protocols One assume synchronous communication Other two assume asynchronous communication Community support services Another class of infrastructure services needed to support communally maintained semantic web service activities Need Services for Authenticated definitions and mappings among concepts ontology and their derivatives information and access security privacy and confidentiality management community based preference and reliability reporting based on collected feedback from service clients policy and protocol management as well as validation and dispute resolution lifecycle management Quality of Service Enforcement of QoS metrics Can be topic of negotiation processes must be monitored during enactment Enforcement of QoS level agreements deadlines accuracy and cost Currently under study Not addressed in detail by SWSA committee References Mark Burstein Christoph Bussler Michal Zaremba Tim Finin Michael N Huhns Massimo Paolucci Amit P Sheth Stuart Williams A Semantic Web Services Architecture IEEE Internet Computing September October 2005