Radial Basis Networks:Brief Description of RBF NetworksProject OverviewAdaptation FormulasProgrammingTesting & ComparisonSinusoidal Function TestingPiecewise Linear Function TestingPolynomial Function TestingConclusionRadial Basis Networks:An Implementation of Adaptive CentersNivas DurairajECE539 Final ProjectBrief Description of RBF Networks•Consists of 3 layers (input, hidden, output)•Input layer made up of nodes that connect network to environment•At input of each neuron (hidden layer), distance between neuron center & input vector is calculated•Apply RBF (Gaussian bell function) to form output of the neurons. •Output layer is linear and supplies response of network to activation function.Project OverviewPurpose: Develop a Radial Basis Network with a supervised selection of centersQuestion: Are there any disadvantages or advantages between a fixed center RBF network and an adaptive RBF network? A RBF network with multiple outputsAdaptation FormulasRBF with supervised selection of centers require the following formulas: )()()()1(1nwnEnwnwiii1. Linear Weights (output layer)2. Positions of centers (hidden layer))()()()1(2ntnEntntiii3. Spreads of centers (hidden layer))()()()1(1311nnEnniiiW: 1x1T: 1xm vector : mxm matrixM is the feature dimension1iProgramming•Used Matlab to implement RBF Network with Adaptive Centers•Sample code for calculation of linear weights given below: %Calculation of linear weights weightdiff=0; for j=1:n g=exp(-0.5((x(j,:)-t(i,:)))*covinv(:,:,i)*((x(j,:)-t(i,:))')); weightdiff = weightdiff + e(j)*g; end w(i)=w(i) - (eta1*weightdiff); )()()()1(1nwnEnwnwiiiTesting & Comparison•Tested Adaptive Center RBF against Fixed Center RBF. •Used data for three functions, namely sinusoidal, piecewise-linear, and polynomial functions.•Made use of the cost function given below analyze differences between two networksNjjeE1221MiCijijjjjitxGwdxFde1)()(*Cost FunctionwhereSinusoidal Function Testing-0.8 -0.6 -0.4 -0.2 0 0.2 0.4 0.6-1.5-1-0.500.51RBF with Adaptive Centerstest samplesapproximated curvetrain samplesradial basisFor fewer radial basis functions, adaptive center RBF network seems to perform a bit better. However, after number of RBFs increase, results in cost function are negligible.Piecewise Linear Function Testing-0.5 -0.4 -0.3 -0.2 -0.1 0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5-2.5-2-1.5-1-0.500.511.5RBF with Adaptive Centerstest samplesapproximated curvetrain samplesradial basisAdaptive center RBF network performed better till the number of radial basis functions reached 6. I found that at higher numbers of radial basis functions (9 and above), both RBF networks were providing similar approximations of piecewise-linear function.Polynomial Function TestingThe adaptive center RBF network was clearly the winner in the approximation of the polynomial function. Differences in cost function for higher numbers of RBFs were too small for Excel to plot. -0.5 -0.4 -0.3 -0.2 -0.1 0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5-0.08-0.06-0.04-0.0200.020.040.060.080.1RBF with Adaptive Centerstest samplesapproximated curvetrain samplesradial basisConclusion•Results show RBF network with adaptive centers performs slightly better than fixed-center RBF.•Advantage of Adaptive RBF: Performs better with fewer RBFs•Disadvantage of Adaptive RBF: Takes longer to run. •Unless situation is known, one cannot say with certainty that one model is better than
View Full Document
Unlocking...