DOC PREVIEW
MIT 15 414 - Recitation II

This preview shows page 1-2-3-4 out of 12 pages.

Save
View full document
View full document
Premium Document
Do you want full access? Go Premium and unlock all 12 pages.
Access to all documents
Download any document
Ad free experience
View full document
Premium Document
Do you want full access? Go Premium and unlock all 12 pages.
Access to all documents
Download any document
Ad free experience
View full document
Premium Document
Do you want full access? Go Premium and unlock all 12 pages.
Access to all documents
Download any document
Ad free experience
View full document
Premium Document
Do you want full access? Go Premium and unlock all 12 pages.
Access to all documents
Download any document
Ad free experience
Premium Document
Do you want full access? Go Premium and unlock all 12 pages.
Access to all documents
Download any document
Ad free experience

Unformatted text preview:

15.414 - Recitation II Jiro E. Kondo Summer 2003Topics in Today’s Recitation: I. From Accounting Data to PV Analysis: Guide-lines and Reasoning. II. Turbo Widgets: An Example. III. Practice Problem Requests. 1I. From Accounting Data to PV Analysis. • PV Analysis: Only interested in cashflows and discounting. We’ll focus on the cashflows for now.  Problem: Getting these cashflows is a chal-lenge... 1. Requires information to be gathered at many levels of the firm and several divisions. 2. Gathered information is usually presented in the format of accounting data. Accounting profits are not the same as cashflows!  Why are they different? Main reason is that accountants recognize profits when they are promised which usually is before they are ac-tually realized.  Need to make adjustments to get cashflows. 2I. Continued... • Obtaining Cashflows: Methodology (with some details left out)... → Start with accounting data, namely the in-come statement and the balance sheet.  STEP ONE: From the income statement, get a measure of earnings before taxes and de-preciation (EBTD), also called operating prof-its. → EBTD: Simplification of EBITDA (I’ve left out some details)... → We choose not to include depreciation in this figure (i.e. use EBTD instead of EBT) only out of convenience, though one could also argue that it is intuitive because depreciation isn’t a cashflow. In any case, we could per-form this step by computing EBT here while using depreciation (instead of the depreciation tax shield) in step two (same answer obtains). 3I. Continued...  STEP TWO: Compute the depreciation tax shield (DTS). → DTS: Amount of depreciation booked dur-ing the year times the tax rate. DT S = Depreciation × (1 − tax). (1) → Why? Though not a cashflow, depreciation represents the accounting treatment of capi-tal expenditures on profits. As a result, since accounting profits are used to compute tax lia-bility, depreciation reduces this tax burden (i.e. increases cashflows). 4I. Continued...  STEP THREE: Find the capital expen-diture, maintenance, and asset sales (CAPX) figures from investment data (e.g. can back this out from the balance sheet). → We include this because CAPX is a cash-flow, but it wasn’t accounted for in steps one and two.  STEP FOUR: Calculate net working cap-ital (NWC) and keep track of changes in this measure. → More on this starting next slide...  STEP FIVE: Now we put it all together. You can think of steps two to four as be-ing adjustments that change accounting prof-its (roughly computed in step one) into actual cashflows via the formula: CF = EBT D×(1−tax)+DT S+CAP X−∆NW C. (2) 5I. Continued... • Let’s describe the discrepancies (between ac-counting profits and cashflows) addressed by the use of the NWC in steps 4 and 5.  Discrepancy # 1: Sales and COGS are rec-ognized even if revenue from the sale hasn’t been received yet or some costs of production haven’t been paid. → Recognizing these cashflows early (as in the case of unreceived revenues) or late (unpaid bills) is misleading given that there is a time value of money. All else equal, we all prefer paying late and receiving early, right?  Discrepancy # 2: Expenses incurred to-wards gathering inventory are not recognized until the items are actually sold. → Again, the expense inevitably occurs before the sale. Not recognizing this cost at the right time overstates profits because it neglects the time-value of money. 6I. Continued... ◦ Extreme Example: Future sales and COGS may be booked by a supplier once long-term contracts between it and another downstream firm are signed even if much of the ensuing production hasn’t begun. • Discrepancies #1 and #2 are addressed via the Net Working Capital adjustment...  Net Working Capital: Defined as... NW C = CA − CL (3) = AR + IN V − AP (4) where INV is entered at cost (not at value).  Why do we enter inventory at cost? Why does this adjustment address discrepancies #1 and #2? Reducing operating income by the change in NWC yields cashflows that correctly account for timing of payments. 7I. Continued... • Other Issues:... 1. Sunk costs: Not relevant. Don’t mistake sunk costs with fixed costs, they’re very differ-ent. 2. Opportunity costs: Take into account not only cash costs, but also value creation that is forgone when undertaking the project. 3. Inflation: Treat consistently. 4. Average vs. Marginal cost: ... 5. Project interaction and Real options: ... 8II. Turbo Widgets. • See Lewellen handout.  Some Comments: Regarding the treatment of warehouse space for inventory in cashflow calculations. Different assumptions could be made... 1. You rent the space: This is a cost and as a result it reduces your a cashflow (through EBTD). 2. You own the space, but could rent it to someone else: This is an opportunity cost and it should be considered in your PV analy-sis. 3. You own the space, but cannot rent it to someone else: There is direct cost or opportunity cost. This shouldn’t affect your cashflows. → This is the assumption made in Lewellen’s lecture notes. 9III. Practice Problem Requests.  Chapter 6, Question 8: An example of a make or buy decision... 10III. Continued...  Chapter 6, Question 11: Manufacture high- protein hog feed? • Summarize on blackboard.


View Full Document

MIT 15 414 - Recitation II

Download Recitation II
Our administrator received your request to download this document. We will send you the file to your email shortly.
Loading Unlocking...
Login

Join to view Recitation II and access 3M+ class-specific study document.

or
We will never post anything without your permission.
Don't have an account?
Sign Up

Join to view Recitation II 2 2 and access 3M+ class-specific study document.

or

By creating an account you agree to our Privacy Policy and Terms Of Use

Already a member?