DOC PREVIEW
UT BIO 311D - Study Notes
Type Miscellaneous
Pages 3

This preview shows page 1 out of 3 pages.

Save
View full document
View full document
Premium Document
Do you want full access? Go Premium and unlock all 3 pages.
Access to all documents
Download any document
Ad free experience
Premium Document
Do you want full access? Go Premium and unlock all 3 pages.
Access to all documents
Download any document
Ad free experience

Unformatted text preview:

Study Says Eldest Children Have Higher I.Q.s - New York Times http://www.nytimes.com/2007/06/21/science/21cnd-sibling.html?ei=50...1 of 3 6/26/2007 1:40 PMJune 21, 2007Study Says Eldest Children Have Higher I.Q.sBy BENEDICT CAREYThe eldest children in families tend to develop higher I.Q.’s than their siblings, researchers are reportingtoday, in a large study that could settle more than a half-century of scientific debate about the relationshipbetween I.Q. and birth order.The average difference in I.Q. was slight — three points higher in the eldest child than in the closest sibling— but significant, the researchers said. And they said the results made it clear that it was due to familydynamics, not to biological factors like prenatal environment.Researchers have long had evidence that firstborns tended to be more dutiful and cautious than their siblings, and some previous studies found significant I.Q. differences. But critics said those reports were not conclusive, because they did not take into account the vast differences in upbringing among families.Three points on an I.Q. test may not sound like much. But experts say it can be a tipping point for somepeople — the difference between a high B average and a low A, for instance. That, in turn, can have acumulative effect that could mean the difference between admission to an elite private liberal-arts collegeand a less exclusive public one.Moreover, researchers said yesterday that the results — being published today in separate papers in twojournals, Science and Intelligence — would lead to more intensive study into the family dynamics behindsuch differences. Though the study was done in men, the scientists said the results would almost certainlyapply to women as well.“I consider these two papers the most important publications to come out in this field in 70 years; it’s adream come true,” said Frank J. Sulloway, a psychologist at the Institute of Personality and Social Researchat the University of California, Berkeley. Dr. Sulloway, who was not involved in the study but wrote an editorial accompanying it, added that “therewas some room for doubt about this effect before, but that room has now been eliminated.”Effects of birth order are notoriously difficult to study, and some critics are still dubious. Joseph Lee Rodgers, a psychologist at the University of Oklahoma and a longtime skeptic of such effects, said the new analysis was not conclusive.“Past research included hundreds of reported birth order effects” that were not legitimate, Dr. Rodgerswrote in an e-mail message. “I’m not sure whether the patterns in the Science article are real or not; moredescription of methodology is required.”In the study, Norwegian epidemiologists analyzed data on birth order, health status and I.Q. scores ofStudy Says Eldest Children Have Higher I.Q.s - New York Times http://www.nytimes.com/2007/06/21/science/21cnd-sibling.html?ei=50...2 of 3 6/26/2007 1:40 PM241,310 18- and 19-year-old men born from 1967 to 1976, using military records. After correcting for factorsthat may affect scores, including parents’ education level, maternal age at birth and family size, theresearchers found that eldest children scored an average of 103.2, about 3 percent higher than secondchildren (100.3) and 4 percent higher than thirdborns (99.0).The difference was an average, meaning that it varied by family and showed up in most families but not all. The scientists then looked at I.Q. scores in 63,951 pairs of brothers, and found the same results. Differencesin household environments did not explain elder siblings’ higher scores.Because sex has little effect on I.Q. scores, the results almost certainly apply to females as well, said Dr. Petter Kristensen, an epidemiologist at the University of Oslo and the lead author of the Science study. His co-author was Dr. Tor Bjerkedal, an epidemiologist at the Norwegian Armed Forces Medical Services.To test whether the difference could be due to biological factors, the researchers examined the scores of young men who became the eldest in the household after an older sibling had died. Their scores came out the same, on average, as those of biological firstborns.“This is quite firm evidence that the biological explanation is not true,” Dr. Kristensen said in a telephoneinterview.Social scientists have proposed several theories to explain how birth order might affect intelligence scores.Firstborns have their parents’ undivided attention as infants, and even if that attention is later dividedevenly with a sibling or more, it means that over time they will have more cumulative adult attention, intheory enriching their vocabulary and reasoning abilities.But this argument does not explain a consistent finding in children under 12: among these youngsters,later-born siblings actually tend to outscore the eldest on I.Q. tests. Researchers theorize that thisprecociousness may reflect how new children alter the family’s overall intellectual resource pool.Adding a young child may, in a sense, diminish the family’s overall intellectual environment, as far as anolder sibling is concerned; yet the younger sibling benefits from the maturity of both the parents and theolder brother or sister. This dynamic may quickly cancel and reverse the head start the older child receivedfrom his parents.Still, the question remains: How do the elders sneak back to the head of the class?One possibility, proposed by the psychologist Robert Zajonc, is that older siblings consolidate and organize their knowledge in their natural roles as tutors to junior. These lessons, in short, benefit the teacher more than the student. Another potential explanation concerns how siblings find a niche in the family. Some studies find that boththe older and younger siblings tend to describe the firstborn as more disciplined, responsible,high-achieving. Studies suggest — and parents know from experience — that to distinguish themselves,younger siblings often develop other skills, like social charm, a good curveball, mastery of the electric bass,acting skills.Study Says Eldest Children Have Higher I.Q.s - New York Times http://www.nytimes.com/2007/06/21/science/21cnd-sibling.html?ei=50...3 of 3 6/26/2007 1:40 PM“Like Darwin’s finches, they are eking out alternative ways of deriving the maximum benefit out of theenvironment, and not directly competing for the same resources as the eldest,” Dr. Sulloway said. “They


View Full Document

UT BIO 311D - Study Notes

Type: Miscellaneous
Pages: 3
Documents in this Course
Load more
Download Study Notes
Our administrator received your request to download this document. We will send you the file to your email shortly.
Loading Unlocking...
Login

Join to view Study Notes and access 3M+ class-specific study document.

or
We will never post anything without your permission.
Don't have an account?
Sign Up

Join to view Study Notes 2 2 and access 3M+ class-specific study document.

or

By creating an account you agree to our Privacy Policy and Terms Of Use

Already a member?