More from Chapters 1-3 Marginal analysisToday: Four “mini-lectures”Size of governmentSlide 4(Table and figures)Summary: Size of governmentMarginal analysisSlide 8Example: Marginal utilityExample: Diminishing marginal utilityDiminishing marginal utilityThe rational spending ruleSlide 13Slide 14Slide 15MRS and utility maximizationMarginal cost, using calculusSummary: Marginal analysisEmpirical toolsCausationSlide 21Slide 22Randomized studySome pitfalls of randomized studiesSlide 25Observational studyConducting an observational studyRegression analysisInterpreting the parametersTypes of dataPitfalls of observational studiesData collected in non-experimental settingSpecification issuesQuasi-experimental studiesExample of quasi-experimental studyConducting a quasi-experimental studyDifference-in-difference methodInstrumental variables (IV) methodRegression-discontinuity methodPitfalls of quasi-experimental studiesSummary: Empirical toolsEdgeworth boxesSlide 43Pareto efficiencyPareto improvementContract curvePareto Efficiency in ConsumptionSummary: Edgeworth boxesWhat have we learned today?More from Chapters 1-3Marginal analysisToday: Government size; Marginal analysis; Empirical tools; Edgeworth boxesToday: Four “mini-lectures”Finish Chapter 1Introduction to government sizeMarginal analysisA review of what marginal meansChapter 2Causation versus correlationStatistical tools and studiesBegin Chapter 3Edgeworth boxesSize of governmentThe constitution gives the federal government the right to collect taxes, in order to fund projectsState and local governments can do a broad range of activities, subject to provisions in the Constitution10th Amendment: Limited power in the federal governmentLocal governments derive power to tax and spend from the statesSize of governmentHow to measure the size of governmentNumber of workersAnnual expendituresTypes of government expenditurePurchases of goods and servicesTransfers of incomeInterest payments (on national debt)Budget documentsUnified budget (itemizes government’s expenditures and revenues)Regulatory budget (includes costs due to regulations)(Table and figures)Table 1.1, p. 9Figure 1.1, p. 10Figures 1.2 and 1.3, p. 11Figures 1.4 and 1.5, p. 13Summary: Size of governmentGovernment spending in the US, as a percentage of GDP, has increased in the last 50 yearsOther industrialized countries spend more than the US (as a percentage of GDP)Composition of taxing and spending has changed in the last 50 yearsMarginal analysisQuick look at marginal analysisImportant in many tools we will use this quarterWe look at “typical” casesMarginal means “for one more unit” or “for a small change”Mathematically, marginal analysis uses derivativesMarginal analysisWe will look at four topics related to marginal analysisMarginal utility and diminishing marginal utilityThe rational spending ruleMarginal rate of substitution and utility maximizationMarginal cost, using calculusExample: Marginal utilityMarginal utility (MU) tells us how much additional utility gained when we consume one more unit of the goodFor this class, typically assume that marginal benefit of a good is always positiveExample: Diminishing marginal utilityBanana quantity (bananas)Total utility (utils) Marginal utility (utils/banana)0 0701 70502 120303 150104 16055 165Diminishing marginal utilityNotice that marginal utility is decreasing as the number of bananas increasesEconomists typically assume diminishing marginal utility, since this is consistent with actual behaviorThe rational spending ruleIf diminishing marginal utility is true, we can derive a rational spending ruleThe rational spending rule: The marginal utility of the last dollar spent for each good is equalGoods A and B: MUA / pA = MUB / pB Exceptions exist when goods are indivisible or when no money is spent on some goods (we will usually ignore this)The rational spending ruleWhy is the rational spending rule true with diminishing marginal utility?Suppose that the rational spending rule is not trueWe will show that utility can be increased when the rational spending rule does not hold trueThe rational spending ruleSuppose the MU per dollar spent was higher for good A than for good BI can spend one more dollar on good A and one less dollar on good BSince MU per dollar spent is higher for good A than for good B, total utility must increaseThus, with diminishing MU, any total purchases that are not consistent with the rational spending rule cannot maximize utilityThe rational spending ruleThe rational spending rule helps us derive an individual’s demand for a goodExample: ApplesSuppose the price of apples goes upWithout changing spending, this person’s MU per dollar spent for apples goes downTo re-optimize, the number of apples purchased must go downThus, as price goes up, quantity demanded decreasesMRS and utility maximizationUtility maximizationNecessary condition is that marginal rate of substitution of two goods is equal to the slope of the indifference curve (at the same point)At point E1, the necessary condition holdsUtility is maximized hereMarginal cost, using calculusSuppose that a firm has a cost function denoted by TC = x2 + 3x + 500, with x denoting quantity producedNote fixed costs are 500Marginal cost is the derivative of TC with respect to quantityMC = dTC / dx = 2x + 3Notice MC is increasing in x in this exampleSummary: Marginal analysisMarginal means “for one more unit” or “for a small change”We can use derivatives for smooth functionsMarginal analysis is important in many economic toolsUtilityRational spending ruleMRSCost functionsEmpirical toolsEconomic models are as good as their assumptionsEmpirical tests are needed to show consistency with good theoriesEmpirical tests can also show that real life is unlike the theoryCausationEconomists use mathematical and statistical tools to try to find the effect of causation between two eventsFor example, eating unsafe food leads you to get sickHow many days of work are lost by sickness due to unsafe food?The causation is not the other directionCausationSometimes, causation is unclearStock prices in the United States and temperature in AntarcticaNo clear causationNumber of police
View Full Document